User talk:Jenwin1457

History of the Catholic Church
Your proposed edits need to be discussed on the article's talk page: Talk:History of the Catholic Church. Rmhermen (talk) 07:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at History of the Catholic Church, you may be blocked from editing. Please discuss on the talk page as requested Theroadislong (talk) 00:44, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

April 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:05, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

One of your recent additions has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:34, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * This refers to the plagiarism of this edit from this source . 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:34, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yunshui 雲 水 15:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to History of the Catholic Church. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 16:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Please do not present beliefs as fact. Bennv3771 (talk) 16:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at History of the Catholic Church. Theroadislong (talk) 14:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at History of the Catholic Church shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 14:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for disruptive editing, which includes long running edit warring without engaging in discussion with other editors and adding unsourced contentious material to articles, in both cases despite previous warnings and a block in July 2018. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. WJBscribe (talk) 14:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Unblock request
My apologies if this has created more work for you. It wasn't my intention. I didn't realize the required substantiation, nor did I understand how insert the references. Jenwin1457 (talk) 15:31, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Jenwin1457 (talk) 12:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Jenwin1457, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. AGK &#9632;   10:41, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

FYI
Just wanted to let you know that I just found the notifications that had been sent to me over a year ago. I typically use Wikipedia on my mobile phone and never saw them. I just thought this might help you with your future users. I refuse to edit any longer for Wikipedia. One of the comments I received regarding my edits where I was accused of siding my personal beliefs and yet the editor was doing just that. I have decided for sure that Wikipedia is absolutely biased. there are 45 petabytes of information to prove that Wikipedia is wrong about Catholic church history and it is wrong regarding how to determine what is real and what isn't.

I have decided that my family and my children will never use Wikipedia ever again. I'm going to go back to old fashioned books instead of internet-based references. what you allowed to be written about the Catholic church is the viewpoint of individuals who refused to accept historical and archaeological evidence. It's that simple. I found some of the comments to be so offensive and unnecessary as well as unprofessional.

Perhaps in the future you'll consider how to discover what is true historically. Jenwin1457 (talk) 13:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)