User talk:Jeppiz/Archives/2013/April

POV/Biased edit
Hi. Compare this diff with used sources like Britannica and previous revision(s). Changes to the last accepted lead/intro section and replaced supported theory with something different. The new content does not matches with sources. Zheek (talk) 15:30, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration declined
This is a courtesy notice that a request for arbitration, which named you as a party, has been declined. Feel free to see the Arbitrators' opinions for potential suggestions on moving forward.

For the Arbitration Committee, -- Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 02:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment
Hi. Please comment: Scythians: Consensus for the lead section: Iranian people or Iranian-speaking people. Thanks. Zheek (talk) 10:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

1991
Just wanted to thank you for this contribution. I was so tempted to hit the revert but to have done so would have landed me with a long suspention. I am on 1RR. You know the admins and how they operate, I can revert vandalism only and they would never see that as vandalism. Cheers. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 10:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

And again...
There we go again... and after the Arbcom analysis... History2007 (talk) 20:48, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
I have to second this. Thanks for your input on the administrators board.--Aichik (talk) 13:27, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Iranian protests article
Hello again, unfortunately a not so neutral person have come and deleted most of the information and neutral sources, but i have added it back, the person is not neutral about it, this is what he/she wrote:
 * Quote: "sons of Pahlavi hookers get out of here.:("

And this: :Quote: "Mousavi is one of the most hawkish Iranian politicians (see his involment in founding Hezbollah, reopening nuclear program, etc.):("

If you ask me i think the page should be protected.

Here is the person: User talk:46.239.47.122 --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)