User talk:Jeppiz/Archives/2013/March

Venetian and Gallo-Italic
I provided some sources for my statement about Venetian and Gallo-Italic languages/dialects.--Carnby (talk) 23:37, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Ottimo! Le ho letto e penso che siano buone quindi ho aggiornato l'articolo. Ho anche lasciato un messaggio sulla tua pagina nella wikipedia italiana.Jeppiz (talk) 23:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Grazie!--Carnby (talk) 23:53, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Resurrection of Jesus
There is no good way of handling civil but unhelpful commentary at Talk:Resurrection of Jesus—that's one of Wikipedia's weaknesses. Every explanation is an invitation for more unhelpful comments in reply. There are two ways to proceed, and I outlined my suggestion (say nothing and let others rant for a few days). The alternative is to start reverting repetitive and non-actionable comments, but that creates a huge distraction because when it eventually reaches ANI, misguided passers-by will say "you can't do that". I don't think there is enough to go to ANI now, but in view of the previous block perhaps there is (although I think it would be more effective to go to ANI after ignoring them for at least three days and seeing whether anything useful comes from them in that time). Currently, their repetition is plausibly defended on the basis that all they are doing is replying. Johnuniq (talk) 09:52, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Surena
Yeah, as you know i was blocked because i did something against the rules, and i am very sorry, can you do me a favor? please take a look at all these sources and tell me if they are good enough to be used, i have found some extra sources too, here are all the sources for the picture: http://tonbak.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/surena-the-ancient-persian-general/ and http://www.iran-daily.com/1391/4/8/MainPaper/4267/Page/6/Index.htm and http://books.google.dk/books?id=p7kltwf9yrwC&pg=PA136&lpg=PA136&dq=general+surena&source=bl&ots=1CGspHhxcB&sig=eV5nFa2TIvgC0vpl88lkxLyRni4&hl=en&sa=X&ei=7aA7UbmgE5GLswb7uYGYCg&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBTgK#v=onepage&q=general%20surena&f=false and http://www.persianempire.info/parthia9.htm http://www.livius.org/su-sz/surena/surena.html and http://english.irib.ir/radioculture/iran/history/item/81340-surena-parthian-era-hero-of-iran and http://historyschmistory.tumblr.com/post/3344757787/the-surena-the-surena-a-general-was-born-into and http://iranpoliticsclub.net/photos/U09-Parthian1/index.htm

And here is the picture i want to put on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SurenaImage.jpg --HistoryofIran (talk) 18:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello, I've tried to answer as well as I can, you find the answer here on your talk page. I hope it helps!Jeppiz (talk) 12:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much :).
Great, so i can put the sources that are good on with the picture without having any trouble right? i want to be full sure so i don't do anything wrong again. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I my understanding, yes. However, if someone reverts you, then use the talk page of the article to discuss the matter. People are never blocked for making one "bad" edit, but everyone can be blocked for reverting even if the edit is "good". It's not the quality of an edit that can lead to a block, but repetitive edit-warring. Best of luck!Jeppiz (talk) 13:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Just FYI, see follow-up discussion on History's talkpage. The one source you identified as reliable isn't actually supporting the claim he wants to insert. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comment. I didn't comment on the claims, just on the quality of sources. That's why I took care to stress that any edit needed to be based on what source said.Jeppiz (talk) 14:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment
Hey Jeppiz; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Noclador
I agree that the language I used is in general counterproductive. However, Noclador started it by reverting all my commits (despite not knowing what he's talking about) and calling them "major BS". [] Is this a good example of acceptable language? Doesn't seem too different to what I wrote.

Another example of Noclador's ignorance and lack of respect (describing the native language of Varsei as "some obscure local dialect") here: Gixz (talk) 01:05, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your personal attacks
Your comment on my Talk page is disruptive. A few days ago,, I lost my temper and left an angry comment on an admin's Talk page. A day later, I acknowledged that I blew it, struck my own comments, and apologized. Now you have linked to the original comment calling it a personal attack, with no mention of my self-correction or apology. That is dishonest, lawyering. Please refrain from misrepresenting the truth and taking editor actions out of context in order to "win" games.Strangesad (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, your edit history makes it clear that you tend to lose your temper at a lot of people. You should perhaps work on it. For the record, any further post from you on this talk page will be reported as harassment. I want nothing to do with you, as you have shown yourself to be a user with a bad temper and a disability to work with others.Jeppiz (talk) 15:11, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

arbitration
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Statement_by_.7BParty_1.7D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Humanpublic (talk • contribs) 18:48, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Jeppiz, n your statement on the arb request, you claimed that the topic ban was supported by "a large number of admins", with one neutral. I assume that that last item referred to me, however I am not an administrator, and several other editors who commented were also not administrators. You may want to change your statement to reflect this. -- LWG talk 19:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the information!Jeppiz (talk) 20:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

IP-hopper has returned with a new IP address
Hi. See this: 95.5.25.10. Started again. Zheek (talk) 10:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I saw it, just posted about it at WP:AN. I'll be out for the day but will check back in the evening.Jeppiz (talk) 10:12, 31 March 2013 (UTC)


 * OK. Zheek (talk) 10:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)