User talk:Jeppiz/Archives/2014/September

Talk pages are meant for discussions on the article, not on the editors
I'll ask you to keep in mind Wikipedia's WP:PERSONAL policy: "Comment on content, not on the contributor". --Jaakko Sivonen (talk) 03:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

ANI
Thanks to go at this discussion: Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Sesto Elemento (talk) 21:35, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Paris
Thanks for your heads-up, and glad that you've been keeping an eye on that page. Could you tell me a bit more about your suggestion? Cheers. THE PROMENADER  23:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, I got your message on the Paris talk page; I thought you were suggesting doing something personally, that's what confused me. I'll consider it, though. Thanks! THE PROMENADER  23:17, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

I think I'm going to take you up on your advice. Ten years of repetition is killing me. THE PROMENADER  19:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Done, sir. THE PROMENADER  19:59, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

(after looking a Paris talk page) Yeah, well. I really don't know what to say about the lack of attention the article, and the three pleas for help on admin boards, is getting. In my mind I'm imagining a flurry of behind-the-scenes e-mails sent to battle-fatigued admins who had the bad luck to leave a comment in any of them, and that they get so tired of it that they don't even want to look any more. That would fit with the 'usual' patterns, anyway, and that's the only explanation I can come up with. Do you know of any way to check on this? Paris-article complaints have always been left ignored or to stagnate, and I'd really like to know why. But thanks for your input these past days. THE PROMENADER  18:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=624060171 your edit] to European Conservatives and Reformists may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * After the [European Parliament election, 2009|2009 elections] the group was described in the media as [[

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=627455655 your edit] to Subdivisions of Switzerland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Lucerne]]), Amtsbezirke (Bern), district (in French) or distretto ( [Ticino] and part of Graubünden). The Bezirke generally provide only

Re: Strange edits
Thank you for your lessons. -- . HombreDHojalata .talk 22:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)