User talk:Jeppiz/Archives/2015/April

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Penningby castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viborg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Israeli legislative election, 2015
You deleted a post I made, calling it WP:NotNews, but as I told User:Number_57, this is erroneous. Kahlon saying he would decide "after all the votes are counted" is redundant. Coalition talks have been in play since March 25, and Netanyahu recently got an extension until May 6. The overwhelming reason a government wouldn't be formed by then and hasn't formed yet (disagreements with Kahlon) should also be noted.

Only conceivable violation of WP:NOTNEWS would be point 2, but given that "information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate", more information regarding the coalition as they affect the outcome of the election would fall under that umbrella.

Ferociouslettuce (talk) 17:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Temple
Hi. Please do read the Edit History first and compare versions before undoing lengthy edits. I didn't introduce ANY new thought (shame on me :)), but only rearranged existing material (thus discovered repetitions which I eliminated and you reintroduced; why?), and where others "hinted" that the Temple hasn't been where tradition and scholars place it, i.e. Temple Mount, I added in plain English WHO brought up this "theory": the Waqf, and even them only during or after the 1940s (see Islamic Council brochure edited and repeatedly re-edited during the Mandate since the early 1920s onwards). So, where's the POV? Ooops, none there... I made clear where some EXISTING statements from the article are heading (the Temple was elsewhere), which was NOT clear for a reader unaccustomed to the constant propaganda war surrounding the Temple Mount. I also summed up that terrible paragraph (Josephus, Rabbinic view and scholars differ on dates) which reads like an IQ test; but left the rest as is, to avoid aggressive counters--no such luck though, as it shows.

Beating around the bush and writing in an opaque manner helps no-one. I did expect some discussions, but your "undo the whole thing" reaction with an argument that doesn't match the facts of my edit, took me by surprise. I worked quite a bit to make the article slightly more useful to the common reader, who needs plain explanations in the first 5 sentences, not delicate hints & nuances spread over the whole article, and I don't like being "erased" like that with an explanation that seems to indicate a misreading of my edit, and disregard for unquestionable corrections (see removal of extensive word-by-word repetition about the dating). So, please take it a bit easier and with more regard for other editors' time & effort. Thanks. Arminden (talk) 21:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Arminden


 * Kindly read WP:BRD. When your edit is undone, it's your obligation to discuss it and gain a consensus, not reinserting it.Jeppiz (talk) 21:18, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

JarlAxleArtemis
Hi, Jeppiz. About JarlAxle; perhaps you've found out about him now. Gouncebeatduke actually linked to this page, which tells you all about it. But if you didn't click or hover over it, it'll have just looked like an ordinary userlink. Bishonen &#124; talk 10:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC).
 * Hi Bishonen, thanks for your message. I have come across 'Hagger' several times in the past, and Gwarp. I just hadn't heard the name JarlAxle. Quite surprising given that both you and I apparently are part of his "team" according to Gouncbeatduke ;). Anyhow, thanks for telling me. Best regards!Jeppiz (talk) 11:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)