User talk:Jeppiz/Archives/2015/December

linking to relevant AN/ANI discussions
Hi - when reporting to RFPP or AIV (or any administrative noticeboard), if you're aware of a relevant discussion, you need to link to it in your report. It's insufficient to say 'we talked about this months ago' – we need to see the discussion and read it, and we don't have the time to go digging in the AN or ANI archives to find it ourselves. It's on you, as the reporter, to ensure we have all the information we need to act.

Admins are like the other volunteers here. We come and go, we have deaths in our families, we get sick, we get busy, we have to take time off from the project. We read the noticeboards but digging through the archives, when you've been out for several days, is a Herculean task. We depend on editors to show us why we should do what they want us to do.

I don't care about this RFPP thing today because it was dealt with appropriately by whoever came behind me, but I do want to make sure you know to link to past discussions when you're making reports in the future. If you've got a range for your IP vandal, I'd be willing to consider a rangeblock. If it's been months ago, as you say, then perhaps we can narrow the range a bit if it was too broad or if there was too much collateral damage. All depends, though, on that discussion to which you refer. Leave a message on my talk page if you'd like me to consider the rangeblock. Thanks. :-) Katietalk 21:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Case amendment request
Your amendment request has been archived at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles. For the Arbitration Committee,  Mini  apolis  15:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Correct Historicity of Jesus revert
Hey there, couple of days you reverted some of my edits in the Historicity of Jesus article. First of I would like to say thanks. As a sceptic I was too quick to throw the lead of the article on the bunk pile (how ironic). I've read up on the subject a bit and I know better now. Maybe after some more digging I'll take a look at that lead again. It really must be possible to make it more readable to prevent others like me from doing similar stuff :). In anycase happy editing! AlwaysUnite (talk) 20:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! This dispute case can be found at Dispute_resolution_noticeboard. This notice has been sent to you by Drcrazy102 (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)