User talk:Jeppiz/Archives/2015/July

where are you coming from?
I might be able to edit without running afoul or your sensibilities if I knew where you are coming from on the topic of Jesus. I'm trying to make the historical Jesus and the Christian Jesus both as clear to the reader as possible. What are you trying to do? Jonathan Tweet (talk) 22:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Jonathan Tweet, I'm coming from the perspective of WP:CONSENSUS. If an article is controversial, as many articles connected to religions are, then it is always safest to discuss before making major changes. I have no belief or opinion I defend, one of the reverts I did was for an edit of yours I personally agreed with. However, I'm a stickler for procedure. Making articles clearer for reader is great, but discussing before deleting, adding or changing major aspects is always a good idea.Jeppiz (talk) 22:18, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I admire any editor willing to revert an edit that they agree with personally. I edit partly to find out what people object to. Let's carry on this conversation on the respective talk pages. Jonathan Tweet (talk) 01:05, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Amarjeet Sohi Edits
Fairly new to Wikipedia in terms of editing. You undid some of my edits on July 15th and you have claimed that the work is contentious and potential libelous, which is not true. The changes are all properly sourced from reliable sources. Could point out what issues you have had with the article. The current edits of the article are currently partisan and uses conflation, which can be considered a smear against the individual Solution7 (talk) 21:53, 15 July 2015 (UTC).


 * You removed a lot of sourced material without explaining why and without any consensus for it.Jeppiz (talk) 22:05, 15 July 2015 (UTC)