User talk:Jeppiz/Archives/2016/April

Jewish Apocalyptic
Your edit to the Historicity of Jesus is in error. Not all modern writers you have stated see Jesus as Apocalyptic. Regards John D. Croft (talk) 22:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I believe there were four mentioned. Which of them do not see Jesus as Apocalyptic? Jeppiz (talk) 23:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Solomon's Temple
A few points here. The normal edit cycle is edit, revert, discuss. I reverted, it was your call to use the talk page. Vandalism is a word you should use carefully, it can cause offence. The "good academic source" is a hyped up book by a controversial archaeologist and a collaborator which goes much further than his peer-reviewed academic papers. It's a "nice little earner". In reality, this is an extreme position, and a fad that is far from mainstream recognition. It deserves discussion, but cannot be presented as academic consensus. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 23:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Help me understand
What about Bolter21's edits indicate that they cannot be ever counted upon to improve their editing behavior? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 03:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Help
Hi Jeppiz, can you please give your opinion on the censorship issue on Talk:Yisrael Katz (politician born 1955)? 2A02:C7D:3FDE:D400:34AC:583A:B24A:5AF3 (talk) 15:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Talk page use
Read this. It says - "An editor who may wish to draw a wider range of informed, but uninvolved, editors to a discussion can place a message at any of the following:


 * The talk page of one or more articles....directly related to the topic under discussion.

That is not creating forums. It is doing exactly what wikipedia says is a fine thing to do. 199.102.168.8 (talk) 02:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)