User talk:Jerem43/Archive 15

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Draft:Honest Kids
Hi Jeremy! I was wondering if you'd be interested in doing a collab with me on Draft:Honest Kids, which is a juice brand. Thanks! Bananasoldier (talk) 05:37, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for BK grilled chicken sandwiches
Orlady (talk) 22:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:QSR Restaurants


A tag has been placed on Template:QSR Restaurants, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

''Unused template. No links. Company doesn't even have a WP article.''

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ...William 17:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The template is a template to create other templates. QSR means quick serve restaurants the industry term for fast food restaurant, it isn't a chain or business. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 22:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Contact the administrator who deleted it. Is it being used?...William 00:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Pizza Hut
Care to explain your reversion of my edit? I replaced a dead URL with a working one, and undid an edit that had changed content to contradict the cite (or at least the live one I found...dead one doesn't appear to have content in the wayback machine). DMacks (talk) 18:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I didn't do that, my laptop is at home. I have been at work for the last 12 hours- I am thinking the three year old at home may have been using the computer and randomly clicked a link while trying to get to ABC Mouse. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 07:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Food Wikilove templates
Template:Food Wikilove templates has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiLove Templates. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 20:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of Burger King
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article History of Burger King you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- 19:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=600490194 your edit] to Cricket Lee may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * chicagotribune.com/2007-01-22/business/0701220053_1_fit-technologies-apparel-industry-long-torso)]

Shake Shack
Please give me a few minutes to clean this up, OK? Bearian (talk) 20:12, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I removed all of the unsourced material. The remainder is, arguably, well-sourced. Please be more selective in removing cruft. Thank you anyway for being bold!Bearian (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of Burger King
The article History of Burger King you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:History of Burger King for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- 20:51, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Dunkin' Donuts/Sandbox for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dunkin' Donuts/Sandbox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dunkin' Donuts/Sandbox until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:23, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

You're invited!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kurger Bing.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kurger Bing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Magical Burger King.png.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Magical Burger King.png.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Redirect The Angus burger (Burger King)
Hello. This edit that you did to the redirect was a little... odd. I've restored the redirect for now. If this was done intentionally, please let me know. Thanks.  KJ  &#171;Click Here&#187; 13:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Jem
I must say I was very negatively surprised to see you undid my edit on the Wikipedia page for [Jem]. But I don't want this to be an emotional battle of who is right, and to go back and forth between adding and removing. And I don't intend to question your knowledge in Wikipedia editing, just whether you did the right thing according to this particular topic and other topics of it's kind. Whether it was correct according to Wikipedia's guidelines for external links, or if perhaps it's even possible interpret it differently.

I quote you "The links you added are not official to the subject, are commercial in nature or otherwise not reliable.". I very strongly disagree with that statement.

I don't know how well informed you are about this subject and how well you investigated these sites of which you removed the links to. But I have 27 years of knowledge about the subject this wikipedia page is about, including constant contact with several of the original creators and companies.

The links that you removed are fan sites that have been around for atleast 17 years. These are the sites that dig out all the details that evetually end up on this Wikipedia page. These sites are not offering copyrighted material for download such as episodes and music, but reviews and information about products in a way that is to be considered as informative and fair usage. None of the sites are commercial, although one of them has one constant banner on top, which links to the sales of official merchandise directly from the company that makes it. The others don't even have that.

These are perfectly fine websites, some of which cover every piece of info you could wish for from a website, such as what it's cookies are used for, sources, and FAQs of how the website is built up.

These sites are written by recognized authorities on the subject, and contain a substantial amount of content contributed by people involved in the original cartoon and dolls that this topic is about. The sites are very easy to use, neutral to the subject, do not contain alot of heavy coding or applets.

One of the sites you removed, contains no commercial information at all, unless you count a link to the original company that made the entire product to begin with, on it's link page. These sites are first and foremost reviewing merchandise that is no longer available to buy, and certainly not for sale through these sites.

The fourth site you keep removing, is a site far more official than the movie site that you left in there. Infact it's the official website of the current doll line made by Integrity Toys and Hasbro themselves. Hasbro is alot more involved with the doll line than they are with the movie. You are thereby removing the most official site of them all.

The official site does not simply contain information on how to purchase the product, but alot of text and images, and is very informative. Infact it is completely impossible to buy the products in question through that site. It is only informing about them. This is because this company rarely sells it's products directly, but through toydealers.

I think you are very far from correct when using terms as "spam", as you called them in your edit, about these well respected websites that have existed for over 17 years each. Nor do I understand what you mean by calling them "unreliable" or "commercial". And as for undoing my edits without contacting me first, after you realized there was a dispute about this topic, would seem questionable according to Wikipedia's guidelines.

I think you interpreted Wikipedia's guidelines a little too literally and strictly, and edited out anything you recognized as a fan site, which is not what I believe their guidelines say.

If you disagree with the above statements, I would like to know why you consider another fan site like "The Big Cartoon Database" to be okay to link to from this Wikipedia page. It is not a well known site like IMDb.com. The Big Cartoon Database is a fanbased site that is not to be considered as an authority on the subject and did not exist for as long as the sites you removed. It is infact a very generic site with very little content about this topic. It contains many ads, and banners shaped out to look like error messages. Infact I strongly recommend the link to that site is removed as soon as possible.

Here is a list of Wikipedia pages of similar topics, toys and cartoons, that include external links to fan sites, some of which are alot smaller, care alot less about copyrights and sources, and more about personal opinions and commercials interests. I have nothing against these sites either, but you can clearly see it's common practice to include links such as the ones you removed from this topic, and even sites that are worse compared to Wikipedia's guidelines. I don't think alot of people would agree with you if you started editing out all of those links.

[] Includes links to he-man.org and surprisingly masterscast.com

[] Includes a link to She-Ra: PrincessofPower.co.uk which is a blog, comparably very small

[] Includes a link to http://www.transformerland.com/toysbycategory2.php?genid=1 which appears to be an online store

[] Includes a link to the site http://www.yojoe.com/ with many banners and commercial interests.

This is the case on every Wikipedia page I can find about a cartoon or dolls. How do you explain that the sites you removed from the [Jem] page at Wikipedia are to be considered spam compared to these?

I'm referring to the following page: []

If we were to read it, and follow it strictly, I can assure you there would be no content on Wikipedia at all, because all Wikipedia pages are breaking these rules in many ways. But let's try to figure out the meaning behind these guidelines, and what the desirable outcome is, like lawyers do when interpreting laws. Relevantreflex (talk) 13:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

You've got mail!
Nikkimaria (talk) 17:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:American cuisine/sandbox
Template:American cuisine/sandbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Chicken sandwich
I know it was a while ago, but I'm wondering why you would archive a page that only has 4 sections. --Musdan77 (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 15 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Burger King premium burgers page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=612985445 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F612985445%7CBurger King premium burgers%5D%5D Ask for help])

Carl's Junior
Hi, there just following up about the lead section edits. I just don't think there's a need to include the other nine top fast food joins in the US. Saying Carl's Junior/Hardees is the 10th largest should just be enough.--Prisencolinensinainciusol (talk) 06:24, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 10 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Burger King premium burgers page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=616338974 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F616338974%7CBurger King premium burgers%5D%5D Ask for help])

Credo
Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Burger King premium burgers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lamb. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Quick brown fox
Template:Quick brown fox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. jcgoble3 (talk) 05:13, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Massachusetts Turnpike, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roxbury and Robert Bradford. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Massachusetts Turnpike


A tag has been placed on Template:Massachusetts Turnpike requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Imzadi 1979  →   22:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Good Article Nomination Hold
I have put your GA Nomination on hold as it does not meet all categories please fix this within the next seven days or I will have to fail this article. Please respond on my talk page or ping me. StudiesWorld (talk) 11:04, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Stub templates
Hey, I am in desperate need of your explanation of your last 53 senseless edits in Stub templates. It was the first try since 2011 to bring some new changes to Wiki. Brand new icons from Google library are in common use, stylistically similar and easily recognizable. Absolutely better than jpeg photos

Template:Japan-struct-stub as an example. CAN YOU name that thing? Black spot, no less no more. Im calling to your mind!

--Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 13:05, 19 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Such a large, wholesale change should really be discussed before making the changes. I would suggest that you take this up on the appropriate forum. It was a bold move, but I think you should have talked this out before doing so. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 04:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

History of Burger King
Hey, I see that you are in school (like me, but I'm tons younger) and whenever you're ready, you can create the new review. I'll try and get to the review ASAP, but Saturday/Sunday will be my best bet. From a first look, the article looks pretty good. Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon!  01:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of Burger King
The article History of Burger King you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:History of Burger King for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrWooHoo -- MrWooHoo (talk) 01:41, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of Burger King
The article History of Burger King you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:History of Burger King for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 14:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=633447401 your edit] to History of Burger King may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * | class="wikitable sortable" style="margin:left; text-align: left; width:75%;"

Nobscot station
Hello! Where are you basing this edit on? All the evidence I can find indicates that it was destroyed - it is listed as so on the Lightlink site, and the Roy book does not list it as extant. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * it is still there on the west side of Elm st between saxonville and the hultman aqueduct. I know the family that used to live there. I can get a picture if you'ld like. Also, the Nobscot station is also still around. It was moved across the street when the owner of the property it was on died. He was using it as a garage, it sits on the north side of Water st, next to the Hemenway School. Use street view on Google maps to see them. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 17:37, 14 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I assume this is the first building you are referring to? It does appear to be a former railroad station; however, it doesn't match any of the images I've seen of Nobscot/North Framingham. I cannot find the building next to Hemenway School. Can you provide a picture or a Street View link? Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)


 * yes, that is the old Saxonville station. The Nobscot one is not available on street view, I'll see if if I can gat an image today. While I grew up in the area and still work there, I do live around there anymore and don't get to that side of town anymore. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 18:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.

Note: I didn't start that discussion, an IP user did, I am just letting you know per COIN policy. -- intgr [talk] 23:12, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Whopper bar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Whopper bar.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 17:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for History of Burger King
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:37, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Whopper bar.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Whopper bar.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Whopper bar.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Whopper bar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Re: name
Infobox company documentation says the name field has to be "The full, legal name of the company, correctly reproducing punctuation and abbreviations or lack thereof. The full legal name of the company may be different from the common name used for the article title." WP:COMMONNAME only applies to article titles. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)