User talk:Jeremiahwootendotcom

Welcome!

Hello, Jeremiahwootendotcom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Stephen Sargent/Whistlin Steve, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  role player 01:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Stephen Sargent/Whistlin Steve, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  role player 02:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Stephen Sargent/Whistlin Steve. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  role player 02:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Stephen Sargent/Whistlin Steve has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://facebook.com/StephenHorse. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

A friendly note
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Regarding the Stephen Sargent/Whistlin Steve article, please take a look at WP:Notability and WP:Reliable sources. Not every person justifies a Wikipedia article. You will need more than the self-published sources you have provided so far. If you can find independent news coverage, beyond the routine local type material, that indicates why the subject is notable, you may be able to make a case. If it turns out that the article is not accepted, I encourage you to look for other areas where you can contribute. Good luck. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 02:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi. Tom N suggested that you were trying to improve the article Stephen Sargent/Whistlin Steve at the time it was deleted. If you want to work on it some more, please let me know at my talk page and I will userfy it for you (restore the content to a user subpage for you so you can work on it some more before trying to return it to the mainspace). This way, if you plan to improve the article, you can have some more time to work on it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)