User talk:Jerems45

Your contributed article, Grimm (Season 1)


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Grimm (Season 1). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Grimm (TV series). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Grimm (TV series) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Seduisant (talk) 03:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Secret Circle episodes
Hi Jerems45! I'd like to let you know that I appreciate what you want to do with the List of The Secret Circle episodes page, but that such a huge change can't be made without consensus. Please discuss it on the talk page with the other editors. Thanks! Murmuration (talk) 03:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Splitting episode lists
By now, from the comments above, you should be aware that splitting the various episode lists that you have today has been problematic. Accordingly, could you please stop splitting episode lists until you are familiar with the requirements for splitting articles as your edits have caused some considerable work for other editors. Problems include splitting lists quite prematurely, introducing bad links, not splitting correctly and so on. At List of Castle episodes there is consensus not to split the article, so splitting requires discussion to reach a new consensus. The consensus was reached at this discussion, where there are links that may help you familiarise yourself with the requirements for splitting. Thank you. --AussieLegend (talk) 12:02, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Castle (Season 1)


A tag has been placed on Castle (Season 1) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:33, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Splitting episode lists part 2
Please stop splitting episode lists, especially List of Castle episodes. The issue of splitting the article has previously been discussed and there is agreement NOT to split it, as I've indicated previously. You did this recently and the changes were reverted. Persistently splitting the article against consensus may be seen as disruptive editing. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Castle Season 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Castle Season 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Castle Season 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Castle Season 1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, (List of Scandal Episodes)


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, (List of Scandal Episodes). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Scandal (TV series). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Scandal (TV series) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Scandal episodes


A tag has been placed on List of Scandal episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Thetechexpert (talk) 04:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at List of Scandal episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thetechexpert (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Jerems45 did not remove the speedy deletion notice from the referenced page, I declined the speedy deletion of the article because it did not fit the criteria. GB fan 15:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Scandal episodes


A tag has been placed on List of Scandal episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Thetechexpert (talk) 05:28, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm striking this because the speedy deletion has already been declined (twice now). --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Something to read
Hi Jeremy, you may like to read Guidance for younger editors when you have a little spare time. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited JAG (season 1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CAG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scandal (season 1)


The article Scandal (season 1) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * contains no information beyond Scandal (TV series), this is a purely speculative article which shouldn't be created until more detail is known about the episodes

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mrmatiko (talk) 18:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Melissa & Joey (season 1)


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Melissa & Joey (season 1). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - List of Melissa & Joey episodes. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Melissa & Joey episodes - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Elizium23 (talk) 19:58, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Samantha Who? (season 1)


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Samantha Who? (season 1). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - List of Samantha Who? episodes. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Samantha Who? episodes - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. AussieLegend (talk) 06:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Samantha Who? (season 2)


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Samantha Who? (season 2). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - List of Samantha Who? episodes. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Samantha Who? episodes - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. AussieLegend (talk) 06:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Splitting episode lists - again
Two months ago, on this very page, I explained to you that splitting episode lists was causing an increased workload for other editors. This was elaborated on at my talk page, in a discussion you started. Only three weeks ago, we went over this again. However, you are still splitting pages incorrectly, prematurely and without gaining consensus to do so. A review of your edit history shows there is ongoing opposition to your splitting episode lists so you should stop doing this, and first gain consensus to split lists. If you refuse to take the advice of the several editors who have advised you, and persist in splitting articles incorrectly and inappropriately, creating an unnecessary workload for other editors, you may bvery well find yourself blocked from editing altogether. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

And please, mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Most of your edits do not fall into this category. --AussieLegend (talk) 08:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Jerems, you need to do two things at this point: a) refrain from splitting any further articles before you have consensus to do so; and b) participate in discussion as to how, when and why such splits should be made, here on your talk page.  There are numerous attempts to engage you in discussion both here and on Aussie Legend's talk page, to which there is scant reply.  You seem determined to continue to split articles simply because they're there to be split.  Articles are split into season articles only when there is a good reason to do so, and when the individual season articles will have substantial enough content to stand on their own.  A cast list and a list of episodes does not approach substantial content, and that's a problem over and above the issue raised by WP:SIZERULE.  There are plenty of experienced editors here to help you; AussieLegend is among the best, and has made numerous attempts to reach out to you, which so far, you largely ignore.  That's a shame, because you could learn a lot from him, and not just about the right way to split articles.  Willingness to work with other editors and to engage in discussion are two of the bedrock principle that define a good Wikipedian.  Please slow down; less, but of better quality, is more!  --Drmargi (talk) 16:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok. Just wondering. What is so wrong with "splitting" episode pages. its a little of bit of extra work when the season of a show is on. But when they show is done and the season/ and or series is over you really don't have to monitor the page that much. and it makes everything easier to access and edit. so please explain to me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerems45 (talk • contribs) 20:18, 21 February 2012 (UTC)‎
 * At the discussions that I linked to above, I explained to you in some detail the problems with the splits that you are making. Most notably the following is still happening:
 * Splitting articles prematurely
 * Splits against consensus or where there has been previous opposition to splitting the article
 * Not attributing splits as required by WP:SPLIT
 * Not including a lede
 * Not categorising articles
 * Of course, as I indicated at the other discussions, these are not the only issues. You need to read those discussions again, follow the links provided in the discussions and ensure that you understand the requirements for splitting articles. --AussieLegend (talk) 23:28, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Grey's Anatomy (season 8)
Hi Jerems45. The information you are adding at the season 8 page is not referenced, therefore it should not be in the article. If you can find a reference to back up your query, your work will be appreciated. If you have any questions, please read WP:CITE. TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 23:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

You wiped-out an entire section
Your edits to The Real Housewives of New Jersey wiped-out a huge amount of content and reference material that has been contributed for years. Ratings and episode information that was very useful. I am trying to repair the damage that was done by you, but I really don't know how to put it back since I cannot "undo" the damage that you did. The entire episode guide for all four seasons-GONE! Along-with the old and updated ratings info. Like I said, I am trying to fix this but seeing your arrogant edits "no need-bla bla bla), really burns me up. I suggest that you be banned from further edits to Wikipedia. I see where you have been NICELY told in your past editing adventures to please not damage other people's hard work. I think that the time for polite suggestions to you is over. Please just stop. 68.37.29.229 (talk) 19:19, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)