User talk:Jeremy09

Nomination of Vex collection for deletion
Wikipedia clearly states: "To object to and therefore permanently prevent a proposed deletion, remove the "proposed deletion" tag from the article." My intentions were not to unrightfully delete your proposed deletion; perhaps I misunderstood actions should've been taken.

There's no reason to delete an article that provides information with proper references. Please add references to improve the article.

The Vex collection article is not intended for advertisement. Articles like Parasuco on the other hand, are purely for advertisement.

Welcome!

Hello, Jeremy09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vex collection, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:27, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Vex collection


The article Vex collection has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I can find no independent sources indicating notability for this ladies' wear collection (note that there is an unrelated home furnishing line of the same name).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:27, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Vex collection for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vex collection is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vex collection until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:49, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Shawn in Montreal, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. As I have indicated in my edit summary, I have read your message and chosen to delete it to restore the ordering on my Talk page (new messages should always be placed at the end.  Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I think you really need to take a moment and read WP:E=N and WP:ORG. It'll help you to understand why your article is likely on the way to be deleted, unless someone can find some bona fide reliable sources. Read them, okay? thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:25, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

PROD
Don't be a bully. Foolishness with deletions will get you blocked. Calabe1992 22:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * He was making a WP:POINT based on my deletion nomination of his article, for the same reason. But he's quite right that Parasuco is completely unreferenced, and a bona fide COI and advert case, as well. I've tagged them accordingly. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Good call, Jeremy! Parasuco was speedily deleted as blatant advertising. Good luck with your article, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't understand Calabe1992's comment. Please let me know who and what you're referring to. Thanks. Jeremy09 (talk) 1:20, 30 December 2011 (EST)
 * It was not a very helpful or informative comment. I wouldn't concern yourself with it. I'd recommend you focus on trying to find more news items about Vex Collection. They're based in Montreal: have you tried the French media? I have, for both company and the founder, but still found zero news hits, unfortunately. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't think of looking for french sources. Great idea.

Conflict of Interest mistake
Hey there,

Apologies for tagging this article as having a COI issue. I misread something you had said while contesting the speedy delete. Lesson learnt! Samuel Tarling (talk) 22:12, 29 December 2011 (UTC)