User talk:JeremyNumberOneFan

Image Copyright
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

If you continue to upload and add a copyrighted image without permission that is obviously disparaging to the subject, you will be blocked from editing. You must own the copyright to the image or have explicit permission for its reuse (verified via WP:OTRS) in order to use the image. Even if these requirements are met, you need to have consensus to include such a negative image if there is an objection to it (which there is). You probably think it's really funny to continue to add the image, however Wikipedia takes its copyright and biographies of living persons polices very seriously. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:30, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * As a response to the message you left on my talk page, the reason you cannot upload the image is explained in the multiple messages left above, you don't own the copyright for the image. If Jeremy Taggert does not like his current Wikipedia image, then either he or his representatives can submit a replacement image via email verifying copyright status and permission. The image you are attempting to add is of extremely poor quality and would likely not be used even if the appropriate permissions and licensing was in place; Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social networking website, and the content (including images) should reflect as such. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)