User talk:JeremyWittet



A tag has been placed on Jeremy Wittet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. -- RHaworth 18:01, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Jeremy Wittet
You have recently re-created the article Jeremy Wittet, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. A ecis  I'm too busy acting like I'm not naive. 18:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The articles Jeremy Wittet, Jeremy George Wittet and Jeremy G Wittet have been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the articles seem to be about a subject but they do not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the articles, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles.   A  ecis  I'm too busy acting like I'm not naive. 19:01, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I repeat: do not recreate deleted articles. If you disagree with an article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. A  ecis  I'm too busy acting like I'm not naive. 19:04, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Regarding your message on my talk page: every person with a wikipedia article must meet the notability guidelines set by WP:BIO. Jeremy Wittet didn't meet these guidelines. A  ecis  I'm too busy acting like I'm not naive. 19:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Another note: The Articles for deletion process is a way to nominate existing articles for deletion. That part of wikipedia is therefore reserved for nominations and explanations as to why existing articles should be deleted. It's not a place to repost already deleted articles, like you did at Articles for deletion/Jeremy G Wittet. You're very welcome on wikipedia, and we're more than willing to guide you through your first steps here (everyone was a newbie once), but I hope you understand that we have to maintain the policies and guidelines that apply to this project. A ecis  I'm too busy acting like I'm not naive. 19:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

User impersonating Jeremy Wittet
This user is _not_ Jeremy Wittet. Distrubingly, I recently discovered that someone registered my name as an account, and wrote a (somewhat negative) article about me, which included several incorrect facts, writing under my name. This article, while deleted, is still avaliable on this user's userpage. I am disturbed that someone is impersonating me and attempting to tarnish my name on Wikipedia. I am the real Jeremy Wittet, and am willing to confirm my identity if it becomes an issue. --JeremyGWittet 23:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I have blocked this account, User:JeremyWittet. The user's only contribution was an attack article, so no further investigation is necessary. —Centrx→talk &bull; 23:50, 13 October 2006 (UTC)