User talk:Jeremyb949

Your submission at AfC Amada Senior Care was accepted
 Amada Senior Care, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Proposed deletion of Candice Hall
Hello, Jeremyb949. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Candice Hall, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Candice Hall to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, DivaNtrainin (talk) 04:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Osmond Marketing
Hello Jeremyb949,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Osmond Marketing for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 00:53, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sourced Media Books
Hello Jeremyb949,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sourced Media Books for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 00:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  DGG ( talk ) 04:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Amada Senior Care for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amada Senior Care is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amada Senior Care until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ryan Westwood for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Westwood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ryan Westwood until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:59, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Amy Osmond Cook for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amy Osmond Cook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amy Osmond Cook until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 05:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

COI Alert
Because the subjects of many of your articles are connected, it is possible that you may have some conflict of interest If the COI is unpaid, it still needs to be delcared, according to our rules on WP:COI. If it is paid, fuller disclosure is required, as provided for by our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure. This is not optional.  DGG ( talk ) 05:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
for (talk)  08:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

On Article Flags, Warnings, and the recent "Sock-Puppetry" Investigation
So, I'm definitely not violating any policies that I'm aware of and I'm certainly not engaging in "sock puppetry." I've been a contributor here on Wikipedia for some time, and have been careful to make sure that all my articles are objective, notable, and properly cited. What the community is doing to me and my account, at this point, is foreign to me but it feels drastic, targeted, baseless and unwarranted. I'm not really sure what to do but I would like to get my account and reputation back. It's a shame to see this level of an attack on my account occurring even though I have contributed valuable content to the platform. I wasn't aware that Wikipedia and the user community operated in this manner but at this point, I'm glad I am aware. If there is a user (especially a more reputable user) that has advice for me as to how I can get all of these flags and warnings removed from my account and disassociated with my user name, I would greatly appreciate it. I've worked hard to contribute the content that I have contributed and it's pretty ridiculous, frankly, to see it all go to waste. Reasons have not been clearly disclosed and it seems like the user community frequently has a censorship-prone mob mentality - with no clearly communicated reasoning behind their actions.

Jeremyb949 (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Candice Hall


The article Candice Hall has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable person. Sources do not provide substantial coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 23:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Guy (Help!) 17:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)