User talk:Jeremytmiller

August 2011
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Scott Bourne. Thank you. Blueboy96 23:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Scott Bourne. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Blueboy96 23:59, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * An additional note--the sources you listed do not indicate that they refer to this Scott Bourne, so therefore the information doesn't belong in a BLP. Blueboy96 00:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

The information is accurate, verifiable and refers to this Scoot Bourne

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Scott Bourne, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Blueboy96 00:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

I think this is a really subjective standard, but ok.......

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Phildorocke for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Blueboy96 20:22, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello: This is the only wikipedia account I have ever had. I opened it on August 11 and made the first edits. I noticed soon after they were gone and re-added. Only then did I see the note from Blueboy. Yes it is coincidental that twopeople have edited Me. Bornes page. However that does not mean we are the same people. Surely, you log IP adresses. As far as "this" Scott Bourne, I believe taht you are setting the bar impossibly high as to the level of proof required to prove "this" was "the" Scott Bourne. I am absolutely certain they are one and the same.I am also absolutely certain the info regarding his prison record is 100% verifiable by the Idaho Department of Corrections as this is where I got it. Furthermore Mr. Bourne has pretty much verified it himself. See http://photofocus.com/2011/05/24/moving-ahead/. You should also see the link [http://books.google.com/books?id=Gy8EAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA11&ots=hlOs_9Avjv&dq=scott%20bourne%20con%20man&pg=PA11#v=onepage&q=scott%20bourne%20con%20man&f=false that some one elso posted on wikipedia. Compare the picture of Alfred Scott Bourne with his current photo at http://photofocus.com/staff/. you can also google him to find more info and other intermidiate photos.

I do appreciate why you are careful to have users post potentially defamatory material. However, what I posted is 100% true and verifiable as is the other two reference that were deleted.

I wouldalso like to add that your accusation of sock puppetry by me is based upon far less evidence than that for which you are judging my posts on.

Thanks and most respectfully,

Jeremy Miller