User talk:Jerimee

Leave a message

3RR
No offense, but don't be warning me about three revert rule violations when you violate it yourself. You reverted the Mackinac Center page three times, too, so if I'm up for a banning then you are, too. MKil 14:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)MKil


 * No, it works like this:

So if you continue to delete work that doesn't support your POV, you are in violation of a rule that is designed to prevent non-constructive back and forth. It's silly for us to spend our time reverting, when there are much better ways to improve this article and others. Jerimee 19:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I add a paragraph
 * You revert it (1M)
 * I restore it (1J)
 * You revert it (2M)
 * I restore it (2J)

No, if you continue to add inaccurate information, then I'd say that's a case of you violating the 3RR. However, as you say, there are better ways to improve this article. MKil 19:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)MKil



Query on your minimum wage contributions and Debatepedia.com
Noticed your good contributions on the "minimum wage article". A number of wiki users have been working on a similar article on Debatepedia.com - Minimum Wage in the United States Debate. Just thought you might be interested. Loudsirens 21:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

ACORN
I don't know if your most recent edits are POV or not. They are substantive deletions/additions of information that has been debated, but you have provided no reason. Rkevins82 18:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Huh??? You have gall!!!!! 3RR on me??? When you have 18RR????
Dear Jerimee: You left this note in the most recent edit history:  (cur) (last)  17:50, 22 February 2007 Jerimee (Talk | contribs) (see what wikipedia is not, or discussion, or 3R rule, or general decency)  All I can say is:  What gall!!! You violated 3RR first. Now, if you want I will contact an admin right now and I will agree to be blocked for my edits, but of course this will mean that you will get blocked also. Keep in mind that 3RR applies to both you and me. It is not a one-way street where it applies to everyone on Wikipedia, except Jerimee. Look, I know that you want to censor info from the Sam Brownback. But you have to compromise. I have left in a series of your edits, but you have been unwilling to compromise--especially on the Brownback quote as it concerns his work as a broadcaster. We both know why you want that quote out of the article. Once it is out then you will remove Brownback's claim that he was once a broadcaster all together. In the edit history and on the talk for the article there are several comments by you where you have stated that believe that Brownback pads his resume. That is your opinion and you are attempting to push that opinion onto the article, POV pushing. Please stop.--Getaway 18:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not leave Uncivil comments on my talk page
Jerimee: The following is a comment that you left on my talk page today: '''== please try to follow some of the rules == The 3R rules and the What Wikipedia Is Not rules are pretty good. I know you are aware of them, but maybe you can read them over again. It can't hurt. . . Jerimee 18:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC).''' Let me begin by stating that I have been very, very civil to you. I have compromised with and agreed with you on edits that I did not agree with, including removal of the adoption information about Sam Brownback's children. I agreed to leave in the criticism of Brownback by the ACSU, even though the criticism only applies to one month, January 2007, and it probably does NOT meet notability. These are just two examples of where I have compromised. Now, as I have stated before and I will repeat here, you have stated on the Brownback talk page repeatedly that you personally believe that Brownback pads his resume and you have taken it upon yourself to rid the Brownback article of any reference to Brownback comment that he was once a broadcaster. You have taken out that quote several times (way over the 3RR, which also applies to you, not just me) and we all know why you want to do that so you then remove the broadcaster reference from the article entirely. That is called imposing your own personal POV on the article and that violates Wikipedia. Also, refer to "What Wikipedia is Not". That is good point of instruction for you also. One particular statement there applies your situation: Wikipedia is NOT Censored:  WP:NOT. You cannot remove information just because you simply personally do not like it. You have not provided an independent third-party reliable source for your personal opinion that Brownback pads his resume. Please see WP:RS. Now, the last Wikipedia rule that I would direct you to is the rule about being civil to your fellow editors. Please see WP:CIVIL. The comment above was not written in a civil tone and I am now asking that you keep your comments toward me in the realm of civility as Wikipedia requires. Have a good day!--Getaway 18:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Heimstern Läufer 23:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Mackinac Center
After a six month absence, you return to the Mackinac Center page and start changing it to reflect your views? I've had something on its Talk page since December explaining why I think your revisions are biased. Why haven't you attempted to find consensus on this? MKil 20:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)MKil

Image:Berverly perdue nc politician.jpg
Hi did you take this photo?Genisock2 16:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

yes Jerimee 03:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou for letting me know.Genisock2 18:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Brian Lunde
Hi there. I have moved some material that referenced Zoominfo to the talk page. This isn't a reliable source. Please feel free to replace this material once you have found a better citation. All the best Tim Vickers 01:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Berverly_perdue_nc_politician.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Berverly_perdue_nc_politician.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 23:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Salted article
Yep, I sure will. :) Good luck, PeterSymonds (talk)  15:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Publication history of Whole Earth Catalog (September 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Publication history of Whole Earth Catalog and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Publication history of Whole Earth Catalog, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Publication_history_of_Whole_Earth_Catalog Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Publication_history_of_Whole_Earth_Catalog reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Publication history of Whole Earth Catalog has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, Merge this back into the main article !. Thanks!  DGG ( talk ) 01:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Publication history of Whole Earth Catalog has been accepted
 Publication history of Whole Earth Catalog, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Publication_history_of_Whole_Earth_Catalog help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! StarryGrandma (talk) 02:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)