User talk:Jerkmonkee

Third opinion process
Hi. To resolve the dispute regarding Dallas Green I have requested a third party opinion, which should hopefully settle this debate in a civilised manner.

--Seraphim Whipp 00:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright then, cool; jerkmonkee 04:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Machina II cover
Hey there. You uploaded Image:SmashingPumpkins-MachinaII.jpg a long while back. The other day, someone came along and uploaded a new version, and is now using it on the Maachina II article. Do you think it is a good replacement? If so, I would ask that you list your image at WP:IFD as it is obsolete. Thanks. -- Reaper  X  04:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Rude edit summaries and unthoughtful comments
"Same shit" and "if you remove it, i will jump you."

I think it would be a good idea for you to think through your comments before you make them. Threatening any sort of violence is a reasonable ground for an instant block. If you make any offensive comments again, I shall report you to an adminstrator.--Seraphim Whipp 21:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry I hurt your feelings; i understand you are upset that I challenge your perceived authority. First off, Wikipedia is not sensored (see What Wikipedia is not), and second I obviously have no intentions to jump anyone, I meant it in good fun and jokingly so you can stop hiding under your desk now and stop your crying if you really feel threatened.
 * love jerkmonkee 04:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * 1.) I did not state that I had any authority. Everyone on wikipedia is equal. Adminstrators have access to tools which are used to improve wikipedia at a more sufficient rate, but they are still equal to every other user on wikipedia.
 * 2.) I have no objection to swearing. I believe you missed my point entirely. The intention of informing that your edit summary was rude was not because the use of a swear word being offensive, it was the fact that you had insulted the editors who had worked on the article so far.
 * 3.) Ironic remarks do not translate well across the internet. Clearly you aren't going to attack anyone (then again, I cannot be entirely sure), but to threaten someone/anyone with violence is unacceptable.
 * --Seraphim Whipp 23:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not censored, it is however civil and I agree with the comments about certain edits and edit summaries of yours. Please be nice. Thanks. -- zzuuzz(talk) 20:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Civility
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Metros232 20:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Haha.. I havn't seen that stay cool page, thanks.. I'll try to remember the cucumber next time i decide to post..
 * jerkmonkee 04:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Dual Cover Album infobox
I've noticed that you created the Dual Cover Album infobox. The issue of handling multiple album covers in one infobox was recently discussed at WikiProject Albums (see the discussion). I think we figured out a more elegant and flexible way of dealing with it using Extra album cover template. Here are some examples. What do you think? Jogers (talk) 23:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * So, what about converting the infoboxes using the Dual Cover Album infobox template and then redirecting it to the Album infobox? Jogers (talk) 10:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Why have you reverted my conversions to standard album infobox template? I thought you said you would be satisfied conforming to a standard. The template you created seems to be obsolete now. Jogers (talk) 21:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * You also reverted some of my other edits at Alexisonfire (album). See WikiProject Albums for a guideline on album articles formatting. Jogers (talk) 21:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I am satisfied conforming to a standard, but there has been no satisfactory consensus for such a standard. I do not consider my template obsolete for the reason that i would like it to become a candidate for a new standard. If there is to be a standard i think that it should be decided by more than just you, and for that reason i started the new subject to get more input from the community; well there hasn't been too much discussion and for that reason i don't consider album_infobox to be the standard in this area, or mine either for that matter. I have for the most part halted the modification of albums using my info_box, but for those i have i do like, and until there has been a true consensus, i would like to maintain these articles the way they are..

with respect, jerkmonkee 01:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Aiden - Kerrang Cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Aiden - Kerrang Cover.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 23:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello. I noticed that you re-added Image:Aiden - Kerrang Cover.jpg to the article Aiden with the summary "reinserted kerrang magazine cover - it is relavent as it depicts the band's growing popularity, and it is perfectly acceptable as it is backed with a fair use rationelle.". No specific fair use rationale has been provided on the image description page, however.  Please note that the magazinecover only covers the fair use of imagesused in critical commentary about the magazine itself.  As it is used in the article runs afoul of fair use counterexample #7.  If you have any questions about this policy or its application in this case, please do not hesitate to poste a question to Media copyright questions.  Regards. ×Meegs 14:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dicovering_the_waterfront_cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dicovering_the_waterfront_cover.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.


 * For some reason i forgot to add that information.. added it now though.. jerkmonkee 19:30, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Evel Knievel - Profile.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Evel Knievel - Profile.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. feydey 23:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Replaced Picture with one with valid tag and source.. jerkmonkee 23:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Please add a detailed fair use rationale as described on Image description page, as well as the source of the image, the photographer, and copyright information. Do not simply upload a new photo with no source info and destroy the nsd -tag. feydey 23:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I added source information, along with copyright information. I admit i do not have thephotographer but that is not deemed necissairy by the fair use rationale as described o Image description page. To satisfy you though, I will comply with the Fair use rationale procedures and make a statement on the image's page. jerkmonkee 00:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Smile in Your Sleep
I see that you worked on Smile in Your Sleep. Wikipedia cannot accept many forms of copyrighted contents - this includes most song lyrics (except portions, per Fair use). In the future mark these as copyvio or remove them from the article. Thanks! Dan, the CowMan 07:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Joel Carriere
Joel Carriere has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 05:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Pop Punk Revival Merge Discussion
Saw you on the Punk WikiProject list... Your input is valued! - Sir, please check out whats going on there Talk:Pop_punk_revival and add you opinion to the "Merge Discussion" Xsxex 22:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Billy Corgan - Tribune Ad.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Billy Corgan - Tribune Ad.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 17:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I have not been around for a while, but thanks for clearing up issues with this image for me, jerkmonkee 00:19, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Punk music
Whats up? Hi, I'm trying to gather some more interest and support for the WikiProject Punk music. Please check out the topics and lets get our WikiProject to function better. I've taken an interest in the WikiProject hip hop and I consider that WikiProject to be better developed. Hopefully we can all work together to improve articles relating to punk. Also, I am trying to gather support and opinions concerning the punk house article and specifically the Theta Beta Potata article which is currently in AfD (x2) at Articles for deletion/Theta Beta Potata (second nomination). Please check it out and voice your opinion. Xsxex 06:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:White Stripes - Early Career.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:White Stripes - Early Career.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok  ☠  20:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:MTV_Downtown.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MTV_Downtown.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Talex.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Talex.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Tchaka.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tchaka.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Tfruity.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tfruity.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:42, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Tgoat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tgoat.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Switcheroo_-_Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Switcheroo_-_Cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 08:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Evel_Knievel_-_Pinball_Machine.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Evel_Knievel_-_Pinball_Machine.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:22, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:City and Colour - Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:City and Colour - Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Missing - Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Missing - Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sometimes - Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sometimes - Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fall of troy-st.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fall of troy-st.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matrix Reloaded Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix Reloaded Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matrix Revolutions Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix Revolutions Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pisces_Iscariot_-_cover.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pisces_Iscariot_-_cover.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 14:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Crimson - Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Crimson - Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Crimson Deluxe - Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Crimson Deluxe - Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hawthorne Heights - If only you where lonely - 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hawthorne Heights - If only you where lonely - 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hawthorne Heights - If only you where lonely - 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hawthorne Heights - If only you where lonely - 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rivet Screenshot.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Rivet Screenshot.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:49, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rivet-Banner.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Rivet-Banner.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Message from WikiProject Punk music
Hello!

You may be interested to know that WikiProject Punk music has recently undergone a major revitalization. Please visit the project page to see our new look and check out some of our helpful new features, such as the Assessment Department and the Collaboration of the week. There are also a number of tasks on our Things to do page that you may be interested in helping with.

We are currently holding a roll call to help gauge how many active project members we have. Please visit the project's talk page and add your signature to the roll sheet to express your continued interest in the project. Also, if you have not already done so, please take a minute to add your name to the Participants page along with a brief summary of your punk-related interests, so that other project members will be better able to collaborate with you. If you do not add your signature to the roll sheet by November 30, 2008 your name will be moved to our list of inactive members. We may also take the liberty of removing the project userbox from your userpage if it appears there, to prevent you from automatically appearing in Category:WikiProject Punk music members. Of course you are free to rejoin the project and re-add the userbox at any time if you would like to become active in the project again.

Thank you and we hope you will continue to support WikiProject Punk music!

--IllaZilla (talk) 00:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

File:Crimson Deluxe - Cover.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Crimson Deluxe - Cover.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Peripitus (Talk) 11:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jimmy Chamberlin Complex - Profile.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jimmy Chamberlin Complex - Profile.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:54, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jordan Hastings


The article Jordan Hastings has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 03:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Rivet (software) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rivet (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rivet (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm  (talk)  20:00, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rivet-Banner.png
Thanks for uploading File:Rivet-Banner.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:When the Shadows Beam - Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:When the Shadows Beam - Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alexis Fire


The article Alexis Fire has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet the WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let&#39;srun (talk) 22:26, 21 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, and hello@Let'srun,
 * As it was maybe her main claim to notability here, I redirected the page to the band, in a section where she is mentioned (added 2 sources). Best, - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  07:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC)