User talk:Jerodlycett/2016/December

Please comment on Talk:Issues of the Evolution v.s. Creation Debate
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Issues of the Evolution v.s. Creation Debate. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Tony Rodi (talk) 21:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC) Tony Rodi (talk) 00:47, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

"On the origin of species by means of natural selection"
is a catchy title. The theory of evolution lends absolutely no clues as to the origins of life. That leaves an unbridgeable gap in any debate about "evolution". "Natural Selection" is self evident and needs no further explanation. It is not in contradiction to the existence of a creator, in fact, it is an affirmation of continual creation. The "big bang theory' lends absolutely no clues as to " when did the dirt take its first breath?" The only thing that remains, until such time as alternative proof is provided, is "creationism". Existence derived from "nothing" is nonsensical. i.e. "A creation exists, and therefore a creator existed".

"Existence", therefore, is the nature of the creator. Without "existence" there is no debate.

It is my opinion, that the presumption of a chemical origin for the 1st living organism, from which all living organisms have supposedly evolved, is unfounded, extremely arrogant and shallow.

"Creationism" in this context has nothing to to with Biblical beliefs or interpretations. It is simply the concept of "creation" having the need of a "creator", however that "creator" is labelled or identified. Tony Rodi (talk) 20:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Tony Rodi (talk) 20:20, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

THE MISSING LINK
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_Link N.B. It should be noted that reference to the "Missing Link" in Wikipedia, assumes without reason, the evolutionary unrelated appearance of a first human, ( having necessarily to mate with a non-human), from which human evolution commenced and continued to produce the existing human race. This is not only presumptuous, but lacks any vestige of common sense or intellect. However, some would see that it does provide circumstantial evidence that some humans may have evolved from apes, although this does not explain why apes still exist and have not evolved into humans. This conclusion however, could only be taken seriously, if it was commonly decided that apes lack either intellect or common sense. This is highly unlikely since apes still exist, and have managed to survive the evolutionary ravages of natural selection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony Rodi (talk • contribs) 20:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:KIC 8462852
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:KIC 8462852. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Traian Vuia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Traian Vuia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Milky Way
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Milky Way. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Edit on the Wikipedia Article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith
Hi Jerod Lycett I've just provided some comments on the Wikipedia Article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith. More of a criticism on the critics. Please feel free to delete my comments if you disagree with them or feel that they may be inappropriate or inappropriately located on your talk page. Thank You Tony Rodi (talk) 01:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of earthquakes in 2016
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of earthquakes in 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 December 2016 (UTC)