User talk:JeroenvanRensen

October 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, I don't get your point. For my edit I took inspiration from the Rational root theorem page, which also includes some examples. Can you please tell me the difference concerning "original research" between that examples section and the one I've added? JeroenvanRensen (talk) 19:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * There is no difference - those examples are also unsourced and should probably be removed. Wikipedia is a work in progress, not everything you find will comply with policy. MrOllie (talk) 20:01, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * But don't you think those examples will make it a lot easier for anyone trying to understand the quadratic formula? Besides, I'm convinced every mathematician will admit that these examples are correct, and don't contain any "original research", because they are just true. JeroenvanRensen (talk) 08:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)