User talk:JeromeOBrien

Your submission at Articles for creation: SS Regulus (Steamer) (April 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:JeromeOBrien/sandbox/SS Regulus (Steamer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:JeromeOBrien/sandbox/SS Regulus (Steamer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:JeromeOBrien/sandbox/SS_Regulus_(Steamer) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RoySmith&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:JeromeOBrien/sandbox/SS_Regulus_(Steamer) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 17:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SS Regulus has been accepted
 SS Regulus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:42, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=SS_Regulus help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Earlshall has been accepted
 Earlshall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! ToThAc (talk) 18:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Earlshall help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

About your edits
Hi, nice job on the Earlshall article. A thing I've noticed is that you tend to make smaller edits which clog page histories; that's not really a bad thing, it's just inconvenient for most users. In the future, please try to make your changes in one large edit, or use the "This is a minor edit" checkbox above the "Save page" button if you can't avoid it. Thanks! ToThAc (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your advice and help I am new to this but I am absolutely loving it. I will not edit so often in the future and will use minor edit if I must. I have a question. If a location is now known by another name how would I reference that? For example in 1910 it was 'Leeward Cove' but today it's known as 'Lower Cove'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeromeOBrien (talk • contribs)

You could try expressing it as "Leeward Cove (now known as Lower Cove)". ToThAc (talk) 21:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)