User talk:Jesal.bhatt

March 2024
Hello, I'm MrOllie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello Mr. Ollie. Thank you for your valuable input. I genuinely think that this has been a mistake because all my significant edits on Wikipedia are being removed by you. These edits are based off published journals, articles and personal research conducted from an esteemed university. I insist you to reconsider reverting all of my edits. Thank you. Jesal.bhatt (talk) 15:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It is not a mistake, your edits were reverted on purpose, since they do not comply with Wikipedia's content policy. We do not add opinionated essays to articles, and your personal research cannot be used as a source here. See No original research for details. MrOllie (talk) 16:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * But it also consisted of content which was cited from published articles and journals. Jesal.bhatt (talk) 16:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your first edit was "sourced" to this, "Excerpt from Charles Eames’ answers in Design Q&A, 1972 (5 minute colour film by Charles and Ray Eames)". This edit has sources but the language itself is not neutral, and seems to describe a reality in Wikipedia's voice, when it's the opinions of the authors you cite that are represented. Plus, the content is really excessive. Same with this, which concludes with the very unencyclopedic "A well-designed logo can convey professionalism, reliability, and authenticity, which are all key factors in building trust with consumers." Plus, that came after the citation, so I assume it's your opinion. So please don't write like that anymore. Drmies (talk) 16:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logo, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Your edit to "logo" was unconstructive as it was written like a manual. '' JustAnAmateurEditor1 (talk) 21:16, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 23:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Jesal.bhatt! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues. It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 22:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

March 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 23:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Jesal.bhatt (talk) 00:10, 22 March 2024 (UTC)