User talk:Jespah

Speedy deletion nomination of File:US Commission on Religious Freedom Hearing on Sudan, 24 September 2008.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:US Commission on Religious Freedom Hearing on Sudan, 24 September 2008.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. nn123645 (talk) 07:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:John religious.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:John religious.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. nn123645 (talk) 07:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Photo Enlargement
Thank you very much!

Nell

Nell 00:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Re:John Prendergast
Hi, large amounts of external links that serve to promote the subject of the article is considered spam and should be removed. WP:EL is a guideline for links outside of wikipedia. I don't know much about your subject, but well-referenced text serves much better to inform a reader than long lists of links. The Interior (talk) 07:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Just a heads up, I have removed the extraneous external links in John Prendergast as they constitute spam. See WP:NOTSOAPBOX for specific policy info. The Interior (talk) 17:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, this was done in an effort to bring the article up to the standards of WP, please don't take it personally. Wikipedia is an encycolpedia, not a collection of links.  Linking all of Mr.Prendergast's online writing and all of his YouTube videos would be appropriate for his own website, but not here.  A quick read through the links on the subject of external links I supplied above would help.  As to the photographs, that was inadvertent.  A gallery might help with large numbers of photographs.  And as to the "resume" tag, it refers to the tone of the article, which, like a resume, promotes its subject.  Barrages of publications, public appearances, and honourary degrees don't really inform the reader.  Please read no ill will into my edits. The Interior (talk) 03:39, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

From what I can see in Ms.Powers' page, the articles linked to are in the Bibliography, which means they (hopefully) support and expand on the main body. As for the actions of other editors, I have no idea. There are literally millions of editors on here. I'm trying to apply the guidelines of WP. These have evolved over time, so perhaps the edits you speak of were some time ago. But they are quite clear about links at this time.
 * From WP:Spam - Articles considered advertisements include those that are solicitations for a business, product or service, or are public relations pieces designed to promote a company or individual. Wikispam articles are usually noted for sales-oriented language and external links to a commercial website. However, a differentiation should be made between spam articles and legitimate articles about commercial entities. Blatant examples of advertising masquerading as articles can be speedily deleted by tagging the articles with. Other advertisements posted on Wikipedia can be dealt with by either proposed deletion or listing them on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. On some occasions, the content can be removed temporarily on the basis of a suspected copyright violation, since the text is often copied from another website and posted anonymously. Before trying to get an advertisement masquerading as an article deleted, please check the article's history to see if an acceptable article exists there. If so, please revert to the latest acceptable version of the article. When an article on an otherwise encyclopedic topic has the tone of an advertisement, the article can often be salvaged by rewriting it in a neutral point of view. Elements of articles about products or services with brand names can also be combined under a common topic or category to facilitate unbiased and collaborative information by including information about the competition and about different alternatives.

As you can see, one has to be careful with external linking.The Interior (talk) 04:36, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Jespah, I am an editor with the same status as yourself, not an admin. You do not need my permission to do anything to John Prendergast, nor do you need to ask me to do things.  I feel the "resume" tag is justified, and will stand by it.  After changes are made, I will re-evaluate.  You can remove that tag at any time, you only need to justify your actions with regard to WP policy.  If you feel that the tone is not promotional in nature, go forward from there.  Would I be presumptuous in assuming that your account is directly related to Mr. Prendergast?  i.e. his company or someone employed by it?  If so, some food for thought - Conflict of Interest is a problem on Wikipedia, in the interests of being objective as possible, editors should be very careful working on articles that they have close association with.  Please read WP:COI, specifically the section on Promotional article production on behalf of clients.  Hopefully I've helped you with some WP groundrules, good day. The Interior (talk) 22:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

If you feel my edits are biased or unfair, Wikipedia has processes for dispute resolution. You can request editor assistance or request a third party to moderate. The Interior (talk) 01:03, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

John Prendergast
Yes, I do think you are being unfair and unreasonable. I told you we would edit the biography as soon as possible. Nell 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Relationship to John Prendergast?
In going over your dialogue with User:Theinterior concerning edits to the John Prendergast page, I was struck by two things you said - the first was your use of the first-person pronoun "we", rather than "I", to describe your Wikipedia editing efforts. Shared accounts are not permitted - just ones for individuals; see NOSHARE. I also was curious about your comment that you couldn't make edits to the article right now because Predergast was travelling. Are you affiliated with him in some fashion? JohnInDC (talk) 12:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reassurance. You might stop saying "we" when you mean "I".  It will confuse other editors.  As to contacting Prendergrast - by and large, the subject of a Wikipedia biography is not a good source of information for the article.  Subjects have conflicts of interest, and are - except in rare cases - not deemed to be reliable sources for themselves.  If you need to shore up the article (or better really, pare it down) then the way to do it is via existing reliable and verifiable third party sources.  By all means, contact him if you know him, but be forewarned that really he can't serve as anything but a pointer to sound Wikipedia sources.  Thanks.  JohnInDC (talk) 12:45, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, can you clarify something else? You told Theinterior here that you didn't work for The Enough project, but here (for example - there are others) you have uploaded photos that seem to say that they are both the property of The Enough Project and that you took them yourself.  If you *do* work for The Enough Project then you probably have a WP:Conflict of interest; and if you don't, then you can't be uploading their material.  Are the photo sources misstated somehow?  Thanks.  JohnInDC (talk) 13:48, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

John Prendergast photo credits
see CAPTION - Their credit is in the image file page, not on the article. Active Banana   ( bananaphone  16:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Citeing a book
Books are far better references than web-sites, in many ways. (Of course books that are also on-line are even better.) Go for it! Rich Farmbrough, 09:21, 5 October 2010 (UTC).

RE: This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; suggestions are available. (September 2010)
Hi, sorry, seem to be brain dead about above note from wiki. would greatly appreciate help with how to do what is being asked. thanks so much! Nell 16:56, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, The Enough Moment: Fighting to End Africa's Worst Human Rights Crimes
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The Enough Moment: Fighting to End Africa's Worst Human Rights Crimes. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Not On Our Watch. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Not On Our Watch - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Acather96 (talk) 19:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Response to Duplicate article
Hi, Actually, not a duplicate. I mis-labeled it Not On Our Watch but has been corrected to The Enough Moment... Thank you! Nell 19:54, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Lisa J. Shannon
hi, could really use help with this tag to Lisa Shannon's profile page.:

This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; suggestions are available. (September 2010)

thank you! Nell 19:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * If it has incoming links you can remove the tag yourself, that's fine. Rich Farmbrough, 01:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC).

thanks! Nell 01:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Duplicate Article (The Enough Moment: Fighting to End Africa's Worst Human Rights Crimes)
I apologize. You are right! Can we pls. delete. Thanks so much! Nell 14:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ShannonLisa.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ShannonLisa.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 06:13, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

?
I don't know what you are referring to re my signature.

You did not answer my questions.

When two editors have different opionions about what is allowed and what isn't....

As I stated previously, some of the links posted were placed there by a Wiki editor.

I was not being nasty; I was being incredibly frustrated and disgusted with your editing, which I find problematic!!!!!

I have notified the mediation committee about your editing.

Your critique of my behavior is subjective and of no value to me!

Are you threatening me! Nell 22:07, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * First, no threats. I'm sorry if it came off that way - I was just pointing out some problem areas.
 * Second, the signature thing. I think the problem is this: In your "Preferences" page, you have to include a link in your customized signature.  Find the tab called "user profile".  In the box labeled "Signature", paste this text:     Nell (Talk)      Click the box below labeled "Treat the above as Wiki markup".  Then Save your changes, and it should be fixed.  You can add all sorts of things to it you want.
 * Third, the mediation thing. The Mediation Committee handles large cases involving many editors.  I don't know if you'll get a response there.  You probably want  a third opinion or editor assistance, there is also the external links noticeboard.  But honestly, this is something that could be solved by us having a discussion about the relevant guideline, WP:EL.  A good article doesn't need many external links.  The section is there for content that can't be put into the article for various reasons. It's not a place to list all of the links to a public person's many media appearances.  But we've talked on this before, I'm not sure if this is productive.  It's a free encyclopedia, so do as you wish.  The Interior  (Talk) 02:41, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Nell - your messages at User talk:The Interior are borderline personal attacks and need to stop. From everything I have read here, on The Interior's talk page, and at Talk:John Prendergast, reveals a user who is trying to point out various guidelines and policies to you in a calm and sincere manner and you are responding with accusations and anger. You need to take a step back and read the advice you have been given. I see that a discussion regarding the External Links has been started on the talk page, yet you have not even edited there since 2009. You do not own the article, and you cannot control what does and does not appear on the page; what you can do is provide your input and rationale on the article talk page so consensus can be determined with regard to what should and should not be included. Please do so, and do not continue to simply revert to your preferred version until consensus regarding the appropriateness of the links is determined. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:John Prendergast October 2010.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:John Prendergast October 2010.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

John Prendergast October 2010.jpg
Hi, this photo is not being used at this time. Considered using it then decided to go with another so did not pursue required permission process. Nell 19:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Unlikely Brothers.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Unlikely Brothers.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:17, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Unlikely Brothers.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Unlikely Brothers.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:25, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Unlikely Brothers
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Unlikely Brothers, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl/9780307464866.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Unlikely Brothers and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Unlikely Brothers, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Unlikely Brothers with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Unlikely Brothers. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Unlikely Brothers saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! The Interior (Talk) 06:03, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Articles for creation/. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Interior (Talk) 06:09, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

your recent deletio
u seem to have deleted entirely unlikely brothers temporary page. please explain why u did that. will you also please explain why u are following me. Nell 16:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Unlikely Brothers.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Unlikely Brothers.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. mechamind 9  0  16:41, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

THANKS!
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR DELETING VANALISM ON THE ENOUGH PROJECT PAGE!! Nell 23:27, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ENOUGH LOGO.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:ENOUGH LOGO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:57, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo-enough.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo-enough.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:49, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:SatelliteSetinel.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SatelliteSetinel.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Unlikely Brothers


A tag has been placed on Unlikely Brothers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nima1024 (talk) 18:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

James Downey (comedian)
Did you read this reference? NBC.com It is from his employer, and seems to be pretty clear. Are you sure your personal info is correct? The Interior  (Talk) 22:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

James Downey and NBC quote
Believe it or not, NBC IS WRONG!!! The Jim Downey I know did, indeed, appear on SNL. He, however, is not the James Downey credited for writing much of SNL's political humor, not a long-time staff writer, not a writer for the Letterman show, etc.

I have known the Robert Downey family and Jim Downey for many years.

From NBC: James Downey is the brother of film director Robert Downey Sr. and the uncle of actor Robert Downey Jr., but is famous in his own right. Although Downey was a featured played for only one season, and has shown up as a performer on SNL over the years in mainly small roles, he is a long-time staff writer and is often credited for writing much of SNL's political humor.
 * Interesting. Let's discuss this at the Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard where I have started a discussion. Thanks.  The Interior  (Talk) 22:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Satellite Sentinel Project
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Satellite Sentinel Project, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://satsentinel.org/about.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:59, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Edting Issue
hi,

i have added some words to a sentence, which appear in the edit section yet do not appear upon saving new text.

also, on another page, some categories listed, which are wikipedia topics, appear as red instead of blue.

thank you Nell 01:30, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Satellite image of the burning of Tajalei, March 6, 2011, Credit- DigitalGlobe.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Satellite image of the burning of Tajalei, March 6, 2011, Credit- DigitalGlobe.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:35, 21 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:35, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Satellite image of the burning of Tajalei, March 6, 2011, Credit- DigitalGlobe.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Satellite image of the burning of Tajalei, March 6, 2011, Credit- DigitalGlobe.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 01:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Satellite Sentinel Project
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Satellite Sentinel Project, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.satsentinel.org/about and http://www.satsentinel.org/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Satellite Sentinel Project and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Satellite Sentinel Project, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Satellite Sentinel Project with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Satellite Sentinel Project. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Satellite Sentinel Project saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 13:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I have blanked the article pending receipt and verification of a permission from the copyright holder. It should remained blank until someone from the email response team confirms permission. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

hello, i posted on satellite sentinel talk page that flickr license for http://www.flickr.com/photos/enoughproject/5552344814/in/set-721576262055 53879 has been changed to suggested license.

have permission from wiki to reinstate.

will you do that, or should I? or, do i have to upload it again?

thank you Nell 22:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ENOUGH LOGO.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:ENOUGH LOGO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:10, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Enough Logo
Hi, I am not using that logo. You can delete that page if you like. Thank you. Nell 21:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Prendergast headshot.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Prendergast headshot.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:18, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

PERMISSION
i emailed wiki permission from the enough project. Nell 17:59, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RaiseHopeforCongologo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:RaiseHopeforCongologo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

RAISE Hope for Congo logo
I am not using that logo. Please delete if you like. I do not know how to do that. Thank you, Nell 20:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Discussion at Conflict of Interest Noticeboard
There is a discussion involving you at Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard. The Interior (Talk) 18:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Signature
Hi Jespah, please fix your signature so that it links to your talk page. You can easily do this by going to your Wikipedia preferences and using the default signature option or changing your signature to include a link to you talk page. Let me know if you need any help doing this. -- Daniel 06:32, 24 April 2011 (UTC)


 * testing here. yay!  thank you, Daniel!

Jespah (talk) 16:07, 24 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Jespah: Thanks for fixing your signature. There is just one more point. The correct way to sign a comment is to add a space then four tildes to the end of the last line of your comment. Do not put the signature on a line of its own. Johnuniq (talk) 08:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Also. when you are indenting your own responses on a Talk page, you should indent them one level more (i.e., one more colon) than the one above you so that your entry is visually distinct from the prior one.  JohnInDC (talk) 10:45, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Jespah (talk) 14:51, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SatelliteSetinel.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:SatelliteSetinel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:53, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I am not using that logo. Thank you. --Jespah (talk) 15:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:John Prendergast G. Clooney Pres. Carter K Annan S. Sudan 2011.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:John Prendergast G. Clooney Pres. Carter K Annan S. Sudan 2011.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The first photo I uploaded under this name was uploaded in error (photo of man with elephant). I don't know how to delete it and would very much like to learn.  Thank you! --Jespah (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Heh, and here I was wondering which of the two beings in the picture was supposed to be George Clooney :-) I've deleted it for you. Deletions can only be carried out by an administrator – just ask one if the situation should ever arise again. Thanks for sending the permission mail for the other photo; people at the WP:OTRS system will take care of the rest. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Happy to bring a smile! Thank you very much for your help!  :-) --Jespah (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:John Prendergast G. Clooney Pres. Carter Kofi Annan 2011 S. Sudan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:John Prendergast G. Clooney Pres. Carter Kofi Annan 2011 S. Sudan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I have emailed permissions-en‐at‐wikimedia.org with permission for use of photo. --Jespah (talk) 18:05, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:SUDANNOW.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SUDANNOW.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 02:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

SUDAN NOW
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of SUDAN NOW, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.sudanactionnow.com/about.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, i have and submitted permission to wikipedia for use of the material on Sudan Now. --Jespah (talk) 16:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SUDAN NOW


A tag has been placed on SUDAN NOW requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. UtherSRG (talk) 17:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Your talk page note seems to be saying that the article should be kept to help your campaign influence the US administration. Your use of "we" suggests a WP:Conflict of interest; I see that policy has been drawn to your attention before, but please also read:
 * Wikipedia is not a soap-box or means of promotion
 * Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
 * WP:Notability (organizations and companies)
 * WP:FAQ/Organizations
 * JohnCD (talk) 20:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)--Jespah (talk) 22:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * No, that is not the intent of my talk page note. Are you the person who deleted SUDAN NOW page?  --Jespah (talk) 22:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of your own images
In the future, instead of creating files for deletion discussions about your own images that you'd like deleted, simply add db-author to the top of the image files. This will allow an administrator to come along and speedily delete the images without having to deal with the discussion page. Thank you. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 05:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Was advised by wiki to do as I did. Thanks for your tip! --Jespah (talk) 05:26, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Deleting Talk page comments
While not prohibited, it's not the best practice to wholly remove your comments from a Talk page after others have commented on them, as you did with this edit. These and other Talk page guidelines may be found at Talk_page_guidelines. JohnInDC (talk) 12:48, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

SUDAN NOW
Doubting this will meet with Wikipedia's criteria but thought I would ask, just in case. Sudan Now has had a behind-the-scenes impact.

Would the following meet Wiki standards?

Endorsement and embracement by major groups as justification for notability - AJWS announcement of joining, SDC, GI-NET, SGN/i-ACT, IAG, HU, plus occasionally joined by HRW or Crisis Action.

There is no official documentation saying that Sudan Now moved the administration to act on Sudan. There is anecdotal evidence and one could claim cause and effect.


 * Sudan advocacy organizations, Inside Dateline

Below are a few Sudan advocacy organizations, to learn more and get involved:
 * Sudan Now
 * Not On Our Watch
 * Enough Project
 * Valentino Achak Deng Foundation

___________________________________________________________________________

Citation of press received through George Clooney?
 * Sudan Action Now video archive. Thank you. --Jespah (talk) 17:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You can probably answer your own questions if you take a look at WP:reliable and WP:verifiable and consider whether anecdotal evidence, or endorsements by like-minded advocacy groups, can be shoehorned into those general sourcing requirements. Also, a question like this is going to draw next to no attention from other editors if posted here - perhaps four or five, max, watch your Talk page.  Try at WP:EAR (for instance), which will have a much larger audience.  JohnInDC (talk) 18:45, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. --Jespah (talk) 19:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

3RR notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Satellite Sentinel Project. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JohnInDC (talk) 20:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Doesn't this apply to you? --Jespah (talk) 21:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It would have, if I'd kept it up. Even if you had stuck with the GlobalPost reprint of the press release, I was not going to revert you again and subject myself to the rule as well.  Instead I'd probably have returned to WP:EAR, noted your actions, and urged someone else to weigh in.  JohnInDC (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:0.png
Thanks for uploading File:0.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sir Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  11:53, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi. An editor objected to my including this video on the Wikipedia page for Unlikely Brothers, so it can be deleted, unless you feel it is acceptable to use.  Thank you.  --Jespah 19:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Your addition to Ryan Gosling has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The Interior (Talk) 21:11, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Is it acceptable to use the material as a quote? --Jespah 23:11, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia really isn't the place to be reproducing PR of advocacy organizations. As I've noted before, just because you can reproduce copyrighted material doesn't mean that you should.  I think too that in this case, so much attention to this one thing would run afoul of WP:UNDUE.  JohnInDC (talk) 01:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Your admitted conflict of interest is being discussed
You will want to participate in this discussion. See Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:03, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I admitted to no such thing, nor am I involved in a conflict of interest. I introduced myself to a page. --Jespah 20:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * To someone who is unfamiliar with your background, "I was asked by The Enough Project to add the information about George and SSP. I edit Enough's wiki pages" (diff here) sounds like you are in the employ of Enough Project and edit Wikipedia pages on its behalf.  I've explained at the COI Noticeboard that the association is in fact likely only an informal one and thus technically not a conflict of interest under Wikipedia guidelines.  JohnInDC (talk) 20:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Administrator's Noticeboard case involving you
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Proposed topic ban of Jespah". Thank you.  Ol Yeller Talktome 17:57, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Jespah, there's a possibility that a comment from you at this discussion may help other better understand your point of view. Also, reading my report posted there and the comments in the discussion may help you better understand why other editors act the way they do.  No matter what happens, I hope you continue to edit Wikipedia as I feel that you can be a valuable member of the editing community.  Ol Yeller  Talktome 20:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. --Jespah 01:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Jespah. The outcome of this discussion is that you are indefinitely prohibited from editing or discussing the articles John Prendergast, Unlikely Brothers, Satellite Sentinel Project, Enough Project, Not On Our Watch, and The Enough Moment. You are also prohibited from editing or discussing articles insofar as the edits or discussions concern John Prendergast, Unlikely Brothers, Satellite Sentinel Project, Enough Project, Not On Our Watch or The Enough Moment.  You are of course more than welcome to edit articles unrelated to these topics.  Doing so in a collaborative manner and in accordance with site policies would be the best way of having your prohibition lifted in the future. --Mkativerata (talk) 07:26, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SudanNow 2.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:SudanNow 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (t) Josve05a  (c) 05:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:John Prendergat and George Clooney S.Sudan 2010.jpg


The file File:John Prendergat and George Clooney S.Sudan 2010.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Unlikely Brothers.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Unlikely Brothers.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)