User talk:JesseHogan

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

[[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]]

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type &#126;&#126;&#126; (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (4 tildes).

The Humungous Image Tagging Project
Hi. You've helped with the WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

South Park Republicans & Democrats
Thanks for the backup in there. It's been a battle since November. Any support would be helpful. googuse 04:07, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)

Don't forget the South Park Democrats!...Uh, if there ARE anyone, that is! 'Prolly in Canada, that is ;) --OleMurder 18:12, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Autodidact Category
Jesse, this is a great category. But when you are adding the autodidact category to pages, be sure to make sure you include the "surname, first name" format after the "|" character within the brackets. (If you need to see an example to understand what I am talking about, look at the edits on James Merrill or David Geffen, which are now repaired.) This is to ensure that the entries appear in autobiographical order by last name on the Category page itself. Sandover 07:12, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I noticed that was the standard but doing that for 180 pages would have taken more time than I had. I was counting on each page's primary editors to correct that.JesseHogan 16:37, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi Jesse, thanks for starting up the category for autodidacts; it's a good idea.--Nectarflowed 19:23, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks for the recognition. JesseHogan 20:21, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hey, don't worry about it, I had the time to do it and you didn't. Everyking 00:16, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

categories
Please understand the category system. There are categories within categories. Yes, humans are primates, but there are a few subcategories in category:primates. One of those is a better fit for the category:human, and that is category:apes. Humans are apes, apes are primates. There is no categorical reason to stick category:human in the broader category:primates. Even the description on category:human mentions hominid, which is even more narrow division within the apes (specifically, it's all the great apes). I'm restoring the category to its rightful place, and making mention of this note on category talk:human. - UtherSRG 14:35, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

Image:AnonFTPSession.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:AnonFTPSession.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cburnett 21:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Lam Yil Kwai.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Lam Yil Kwai.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:17, 1 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:17, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Rockford Lhotka for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rockford Lhotka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rockford Lhotka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Msnicki (talk) 22:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of DBG


The article DBG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. There is no third-party coverage at all, just a Sourceforge page. Product is defunct since 2013, making it unlikely to accumulate any more coverage."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anton.bersh (talk) 17:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Component-based Scalable Logical Architecture


The article Component-based Scalable Logical Architecture has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable. There are no independent sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)