User talk:Jesse Thompas-Wadlington

List of set classes
Correction: Note [c] on set [0111224151617182T2], (9-8B), incorrectly lists exactly the same array. According to Forte’s rules, it should be:

[0­111213142628191T2]

—as is immediately obvious by scanning through the adjacency intervals cyclically.

Everything would be a lot clearer if subscripts, as shown, were used for adjacency intervals between each “note” (PC) in all sets (including the last note on the RHS).

Boppennoppy (talk) 18:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


 * That checks out to me for sure! I just didn't notice the error when I went through last year to make corrections since my focus was on the values found within the table, for some reason my brain just figured the notes were already correct. Jesse Thompas-Wadlington (talk) 05:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for making that correction so promptly. Boppennoppy (talk) 12:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)