User talk:Jessejames1

Welcome!
Hello, Jessejames1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Genius inside, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JDDJS (talk) 21:52, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Genius inside


A tag has been placed on Genius inside, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 21:52, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Genius inside


A tag has been placed on Genius inside, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 21:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Genius inside
The article was userfied for a reason. It was determined to not be notable. Furthermore, another editor recently tried to get the article restored at Deletion_review/Log/2013_January_15, and it was still determined to be not notable. JDDJS (talk) 22:01, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

But is this article similar to the one I published ? How can it be ?

I do not know the previous story but I guess they didn't give sufficient valid sources. My article is reliable and impartial, and I do not understand why I am involved and "punished" for something not related to me. What can I do about it? Could you at least read it and give your opinion? Thanks jessejames1 (talk) 23:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * First of all, do not lie and pretend that you made this article all on your own. It is obvious that you copy and pasted it from User:Vklimko/Genius_Inside (the userfied template is a dead give away). You might have changed it, but you obviously used it as a starting point. Second of all, it has been established more than once (the most recent one was less than a week ago) that this company is currently not notable. There is nothing that you can do that can change that. JDDJS (talk) 22:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Status and Advice
The article has the same problems: there is insufficient sources for notability. The IBM award was considered insufficient for notability ., and there are no additional reliable sources. Even more to the point, the article is thoroughly promotion; the articles is focussed not on what the software does, but how well it is claimed to do it and how specifically it is tailored for particular markets. Even were the article entirely different, I would still delete it as G11. I don't particularly care how it got here; I do care that it is thoroughly unacceptable for several reasons. Please do not resubmit it unless you first of all have some substantial additional references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases, and second, learn to write it in a non-promotional manner. DGG ( talk ) 04:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Persistant Genius Inside Software Inc. Promotion
http://.geniusinside.com
 * Accounts


 * Commons Special:Contributions/Rbernard84
 * fr:Special:Contributions/Rbernard84
 * en:Special:Contributions/Rbernard84


 * Commons Special:Contributions/Vklimko
 * fr:Special:Contributions/Vklimko
 * de:Special:Contributions/Vklimko
 * en:Special:Contributions/Vklimko


 * fr:Special:Contributions/Salamat78

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for spamming inappropriate external links or self-promotion, so it has been blocked indefinitely. Wikipedia is NOT a "repository of links" or a "vehicle for advertising" and persistent spammers will also have their websites blacklisted. --Hu12 (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)