User talk:Jesselikesnaps

Speedy deletion of Chris Auten
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Chris Auten, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Tom Summers
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Tom Summers, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Tom Summers seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Tom Summers, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Regina Spektor photo you uploaded and put in the infobox
Just a head's up that this won't stand, it will get reverted. You uploaded a copyrighted album cover if the tag on the image page is to be believed, and replaced a free license photo with that. We can't do that, if free license stuff is already available. If you made a mistake in labeling the picture, please fix that. Also, if you upload stuff to Wikimedia Commons instead to English Wikipedia, every project can use it, including Wikipedias in other langauges.

An album cover can only be used on the album's own article, and it needs a special description jusifying the non-free use rationale. All that of course only applis to copyrighted album covers. Free image ones are just regular images, but there are very few of those.

P.s. Writing idiotic messages as replacements for entire articles, like you vandalized Tibet (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tibet&diff=prev&oldid=112974103) is not inspiring confidence in your edits.

Best Wishes, --Mareklug talk 17:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ReginaSpektorGlamourShot.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ReginaSpektorGlamourShot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 18:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ReginaSpektorGlamourShot.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:ReginaSpektorGlamourShot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC)