User talk:Jessemonroy650


 * /archive (001) June, 2006 - July 27, 2006
 * /archive (002) July 28, 2006 - August 15, 2006
 * /archive (003) August 16, 2006 - April 27, 2009
 * /archive (004) April 28, 2009 - May 4, 2014

Articles marked for deleted
All dates and time are Pacific time.

How I review Orphaned articles

generally there are other editors trying to resolve the article, but can't.
 * 1) Pick the old section of articles in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Orphaned_articles
 * 2) Indentifiy - Next I review the article in alphabetic order.
 * 3) Really Orphan - Check the articles linked to it - making sure it is truely orphan. Right side "What links here".
 * 1) Speedy Delete - See if it's been nominated for Speedy Deletion - check history
 * 2) Proposed for Delete - See if it was proposed for Deletion - check history
 * 3) Reduce to Citation - Reduce article to citations, if other processes exhausted

Access Television Network
As I wrote in one of my edit summaries, the company is more of a telecommunications carrier which transports video programming than a traditional network, but it's big enough to be notable. The Hoover's page is not trivial. The Lyngsat one appears to be, but it provides the key information about the satellite used by Access Television Network, and that satellite name is linked to a page providing comprehensive information about the satellite. The article isn't a vanity article. It has been edited by several different editors since it was created, and I think it represents a neutral point of view. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 00:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike Boich
Hello Jessemonroy650,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mike Boich for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  Fylbecatulous  talk  21:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Redirects
Hello. I see that you've blanked the redirects China Basin Landing building]], China Basin building]], and China Basin Building]], with the edit summary that they were not needed. I've restored the redirects for now, but if the blanking was done intentionally, could you let me know? Thanks.  KJ  &#171;Click Here&#187; 00:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Removed links so redirects can die. meatclerk (talk) 00:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Archive 001


A tag has been placed on Archive 001 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Carriearchdale (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Mike Boich for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Boich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mike Boich until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mabalu (talk) 02:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 13 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Barometer page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=612819320 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F612819320%7CBarometer%5D%5D Ask for help])

Edit summaries
Please don't use edit summaries to insult other editors as you did here. Edit summaries are for letting other editors know what your edit was about.  Spinning Spark  10:23, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Your posts to my talk page...
...have nothing substantive or useful to say. Do it once more and I will consider it deliberate harrasement.  Spinning Spark  23:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Notice of cut-paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Mems a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Mems (disambiguation). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 14:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CDC National AIDS Hotline


The article CDC National AIDS Hotline has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability. No significant incoming wikilinks. Tagged for notability since June 2009.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~Kvng (talk) 04:58, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Notice of discretionary sanctions
Jytdog (talk) 04:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Jytdog (talk) 04:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user subpage at Talk:Mark Dice may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively, you may add  to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 14:41, 13 May 2019 (UTC)