User talk:Jesserealfan

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 21:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Jesse Jane, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Your edit summaries are not okay  Garchy (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. A couple of things:
 * First, when others remove an edit you have made, the next step is to discuss it on the article talkpage. Do not just reinsert your edit over and over - that's called edit-warring and is a short route to being blocked from editing.
 * Second, please read this policy regarding calling other people names. Note also the warning above from.
 * Third, on your specific edit - it's appropriate to include a properly referenced sentence that Jesse Jane is retiring from the adult industry (and thank you for originally finding this fact and adding it in); but please do not keep re-adding a promotional reference to the teeth-whitening company. It's a breach of this policy because the link serves no encyclopedic purpose and is to a page whose only real function is to sell commercial products. It's also borderline spam - Wikipedia is nota place for commercial promotions.
 * In my view the article as it stands at this moment includes an appropriate reference to Jesse Jane's retirement. Hopefully that resolve the issue, but if not, pelase do feel free to discuss it at Talk:Jesse Jane and see if a consensus can be reached for further changes. And as above, you really are welcome to edit Wikipedia; the above is just necessary advice on how editing works. -- Euryalus (talk) 22:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Further to the above, I've noticed the obvious link to User:Jessesfan; an account that spammed the same promotional links into this article back in November. To prevent this ongoing disruption I've blocked this account. Appeal options are in the template below: an appeal would need to address both the promotional edits and the personal attacks. -- Euryalus (talk) 22:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Euryalus (talk) 22:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)