User talk:JessicaRRandazza

WP:NOT
Please note that wikipedia is not an advocacy site and adding information and links not in keeping with our policy on a neutral point of view is not acceptable. Also note that wikipedia is a world-wide encyclopedia, so adding information specific to a single country on a page about a world-wide phenomenon is not appropriate. Thanks, WLU (talk) 18:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:5P
Please review the five pillars of wikipedia. Note that we are an encyclopedia, not an advocacy site, and we are required to adhere to a neutral point of view. Pages must be notable to avoid deletion, and must not be written like an advertisement. Information must be verifiable in reliable sources and should provide a world-wide context. The Court Appointed Special Advocate page even as is after a substantial cull, still needs substantial work. WLU (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Blanket revert
Please do not blanket revert. Review the policies I have pointed to, then decide on an edit-by-edit basis if things need to be replaced. The 'volunteers' section of CASA read like an advocacy piece attempting to establish that CASA is really important. It's also written from the first person plural ('we') which is inappropriate. It's unsourced. It's unencyclopedic. It reads like a how-to manual or an advertisement. I am removing the information per policy, please do me the courtesy of engaging in discussion or at least reading the policies in question.

The external links section is far too large, WP:EL states that links should be kept to a minimum. Linking ot every single state CASA site is unnecesary when there is a national one, and your revert replaced a second link to the national one, immediately below. When I trimmed the EL section, I deliberately left the link in because that one is appropriate.

Thanks, WLU (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)