User talk:Jessicamoire/sandbox

This draft has great sources. Very impressive to see the outline of sources that had been found already to back up, so there seems to be a lot o information to filter through for a comprehensive page. I would suggest beginning to create a lead so that the page is easier to follow for all users and they have a good reference point in the sandbox instead of clicking on the link constantly to read what it entails so far. Because this topic can also be heard, an audio clip representation embedded into the page would be great!

The most important thing could be to have it structured as to what each person is doing so there is no overlap and the sources are all unique or reference back effectively.

However, I think one of the factors that can be included in our own sandbox is more book sources. We have a lot of pdf documents, but finding full volumes specific to this would improve our page a lot. (DGranados0809 (talk) 00:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC))

I notice this as well from DGranado0809. There are a good amount of sources that would really solidify the the article itself, and I think the organization is very good and put-together! I think from my perspective that even though the rough draft is well organized, there seem to be some information missing from each header. What I mean by that is there isn't really a starting point for any headers, just what should be found. However, I don't think this will be a problem with the amount of sources you guys have, and the fact that this is only a rough draft, so I'm sure you will fill up those topics quickly. I really like your table on contents and I think my group should take that into account for organization as well! I really helps outline everything. Jellybean745 (talk) 18:42, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

I love that your group set up the draft page to mirror what a finished Wikipage may look like. It's a smart decision to help the transfer process be easier. I also see you all have come up with a vast number of sources which I think is a good, a small tip that might help is if you mark the sources with which "related topic" you may think it'd be most helpful for. This could aid so that you know exactly where to look for what when you go back to create the final page. DGranado0809 mentioned that an audio clip would be a great addition based on your topic and I agree with that as well, if it's easily possible. Great page otherwise!Naija824 (talk) 21:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

I think it would be good if you develop an intro with more details so it’s easier to understand the topic. The article published on the Wikipedia page has a brief description and does not have as many details. It would be interesting if more evidence of this phenomenon was added. It would also be great to add more examples of children's utterances as a reference. I think it's great that you have a table of contents, the structure looks better organized. You already have a great variety of sources to obtain information, which is great! Definitely, my group needs to include more sources. Good job! Debbie RT (talk) 23:45, 23 March 2020 (UTC)