User talk:Jetfighterace212

Hey guys,

Just doing a comparison of the T-50 PAK FA versus the F-22 Raptor.

The PAK FA is faster than the F-22 by .05 Mach. Its supercruise, however, is substantially lower, as the Raptor's is 1.82M and the PAK FA's 1.6M.

The PAK FA has a greater range, however. The PAK FA also has a greater ferry range (that is, with one in-flight refuelling). The service ceiling is about the same, at approximately 65,000 feet. The wing loading is also a close, as the PAK FA's is variable and envelops the F-22's, so we'll give it to the PAK FA. The thrust-to-weight ratio is better on the F-22. The maximum design g-load: F-22, hands down.

So who won? Which aircraft would win in a dogfight? Well, I'll tell you. It's the PAK FA.

Jetfighterace212 (talk) 17:12, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Free flight simulators
Hello Jetfighterace212,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Free flight simulators for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Itsalleasy (talk) 15:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Jetfighterace212, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Thanks Itsslleasy, but I would like to contest the deletion of the page.

Airfighters Rortos
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Airfighters Rortos, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://appshopper.com/games/airfighters-pro-rortos.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Airfighters Rortos


A tag has been placed on Airfighters Rortos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://appshopper.com/games/airfighters-pro-rortos. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Westroopnerd (talk) 21:58, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of RC Plane 2


The article RC Plane 2 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced; insufficient reviews in vetted vg reliable sources to write a full article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 14:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of RC Plane 2 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RC Plane 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/RC Plane 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 21:56, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fighter Wing 2


The article Fighter Wing 2 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not appear to meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  KJ  Discuss? 23:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)