User talk:JethroHiggins

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:JethroHiggins/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:JethroHiggins/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Whispering&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:JethroHiggins/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Whispe ring  00:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TheSocialCatholic
Hello JethroHiggins,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged TheSocialCatholic for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The reason given does not seem to apply here. I'm not required by this criterian to indicate notoriety but simply importance. The importance is the response to the politicization of Catholic social teaching. I intend to flesh out this page with additional context, but judging the reason for this pages existence as important seems rather subjective. Is the position wikipedia supports here that Catholic Apostolates are unimportant? EWTN has a page. They have greater notoriety, but the reason for importance is the same. JethroHiggins (talk) 09:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)