User talk:Jetman

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- S iva1979 Talk to me  13:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Summaries
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature. When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis  ( Μελ Ετητης ) 19:28, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Ok, I just forget it sometimes. --Jetman 20:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Meksiko
Tämä jäi kirjoittamatta keskustelusivulleni (, koska minut on heivattu viikoksi ulos...):
 * Ei se mitään uutta tutkimusta ole, jos johdonmukaisesti laittaa esp. México-nimisen valtion México-nimisen pääkaupungin olemaan suomeksi Meksikon pääkaupunki Meksiko. Samoin on laita myös Brasilian valtion ja Brasilian kaupungin!
 * Yst. terv.--PKo 15:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Ehdotan, että jatketaan keskustelua sitten, kun Tbonen langettama viikon esto fi.wikissä päättyy. --Jetman 15:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Tekijänoikeusrikkomus?
Mitä tarkoittaa keskustelusivullani Itä-Uudenmaan kohdalla:


 * Tekijänoikeusrikkomus. --Jannex 18. syyskuuta 2006 kello 18.28 (UTC)

En ole yhden ainuttakaan kuvaa laittanut koskaan Wikipediaan, joten syytös esim. Itä-Uudenmaan vaakunan tekijänoikeuden rikkomisesta on aiheeton. Sen sijaan olen keskustellut vaakunasta ja tuntuupa se nyt olevankin oikea.

Jos siis tuollaisesta on kysymys, ottanet ystävällisesti yhteyttä Jannexiin, itse kun en viikkoon pääse...

Terv. --85.157.87.76 14:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * No kysyin asiaa Jannexin keskustelusivulla: fi:Keskustelu käyttäjästä:Jannex. Ja vastauskin tuli parissa minuutissa :). --Jetman 15:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Kiitos vaivannäöstä: ":Kyse oli jostain ikivanhasta artikkelista, joka paljastui kopioksi vasta eilen. Taisi olla kyseessä Pirkanmaan osuuskauppa, teksti kopioitu suoraan yrityksen www-sivuilta. --Jannex 19. syyskuuta 2006 kello 15.18 (UTC)"
 * Varmaan näin on tapahtunut, mutta olen huomannut "pilvin pimein" monia muitakin, muiden kopioimia artikkeleita.
 * Ei kai minua sentään oikeuteen haasteta, vaan korkeintaan artikkeli poistetaan?
 * Terv. --85.157.87.76 17:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Frank's recent action
Now that I am blocked in fi.wiki I must approach you this way. Frank, for personal hatred towards me, has decided to take advantage of my block and vandalize my user discussion page with a phony Sock puppet charge: http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keskustelu_k%C3%A4ytt%C3%A4j%C3%A4st%C3%A4:Jaakko_Sivonen Everyone knows this is not true, I have wrtitten with my own name for long in Suomi24 for example. So, since I cannot currently delete that vandalism, could you please do it for me? Thank you. --Jaakko Sivonen 16:33, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Minusta sock puppet -epäily on melko kaukaa haettu, mutta eipä taida kyltin yksipuolinen poistaminen ilman keskustelua ihan sallittua sekään olla. Suosittelen jättämään täällä en.wikissä viestin vaikka Jniemenmaan keskustelusivulle. Kun IP:t on tarkistettu, epäily ainakin voidaan lopullisesti poistaa mahdottomana varmentaa. --Jetman 16:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Tein noin. Minulle on kuitenkin täysin mahdotonta puolustautua fi.wikissa muokkauseston vuoksi ja tämän Frank tietääkin (ja siksi toimi). Olen kirjoittanut mm. Suomi24:ssa, Karelia Forumilla ja Ezboardilla omalla nimelläni kauemmin kuin olen muokannut Wikipediaa nimelläni tai aktiivisesti IP:na. Mielestäni tuossa on tarpeeksi todisteita. Lisäksi olen muokannut runsaasti muitakin aiheita kuin kielipolitiikkaa Wikipediassa ja aloittanut kuusi aiheeseen liittymätöntä artikkelia. --Jaakko Sivonen 17:23, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * ML poisti sen nyt. --Jaakko Sivonen 17:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Lapsi - CMX
Hi I've checked the lyrics sites, but cannot find an English translation, so assume you are right! Are you sure about the album title though. Internet sites I've looked at don't seem to agree with you! regards Tony 21:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)Tony


 * "Lapsi" is Finnish for a child, and it does really tell about a father raping his own son. I am too sleepy to translate the lyrics now, but you can ask anyone at the Finnish Wikipedia... ;) --Jetman 22:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Toru Takemitsu
Please explain the reason for your recent edit to this page. You deleted well-sourced material with no edit summary.Matt.kaner 14:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


 * There has been some mistake... I just added the cause of death. --Jetman 14:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Ah ok no sweat - will fix - sorry to bother you like this. Matt.kaner 15:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Jeffrey Dahmer / Konerak Sinthasomphone

 * After Dahmer and Sinthasomphone were left alone, the boy was strangled, sexually abused and then dismembered. Dahmer ate some of the parts, while others were kept as trophies.


 * Dahmer had abused Konerak's brother in 1988.

It says JD ate KS. Isnt that speculation? JD only admitted to eating #8 Ern Miller. _Lilkunta 23:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC).


 * This may be a factual error, I'll remove it. Sorry for that. His brother had really been a victim of abuse, according to http://www.carpenoctem.tv/killers/dahmer.html. --Jetman 04:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Constantine Andreou
Hi! I'm waiting for the press announcement to add the reference. The news of his death came from a statement from his family. As the reference is not readily available, I have not re-edited the article after I was reverted. Andreou died yesterday at 11:30 local time. I'll make sure to post here to let you know when I get the press release. -- Kimon talk 17:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I updated the article with a reference. Here's the URL (in Greek): -- Kimon talk 19:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Year Articles
I have noticed you have been changing the format in the articles of the different years. You have been creating subbullets when a specific day is repeated rather than adding the date in again. It doesn't say it in all the year articles but from the 1990 article.
 * Link dates even if repeated, for date-format preferences. Preferred style is to repeat dates, shorter than sub-bullets, and helps search-engines to display related dates.

If you think it is better the way you are doing please discuss the changes, but right now the preferred style is to enter the date multiple times. Thanks. Jons63 (talk) 20:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC)


 * That's allright. I may have been just absent-minded... --Jetman (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikimania 2010 could be coming to Stockholm!
I'm leaving you a note as you may be interested in this opportunity.

People from all six Nordic Wiki-communities (sv, no, nn, fi, da and is) are coordinating a bid for Wikimania 2010 in Stockholm. I'm sending you a message to let you know that this is occurring, and over the next few months we're looking for community support to make sure this happens! See the bid page on meta and if you like such an idea, please sign the "supporters" list at the bottom. Tack (or takk), and have a wonderful day! Mike H. Fierce! 10:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Charles Louis Joseph Vandame
A tag has been placed on Charles Louis Joseph Vandame requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fatal!ty (T☠LK) 09:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Then, what makes an archbishop notable enough? --Jetman (talk) 09:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Poistin mallineen, naurettava ajatus ettei arkkipiispa olisi merkittävä. Miten satuinkin fi.wikistä huomaamaan vilkaista tänne. --Ufinne (talk) 10:08, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * As one of the reviewing administrators, I regret that the above absurd speedy nomination had ever been placed -- it was among a large group nominated for deletion contrary to policy by a user who has now been blocked for doing so, by consensus at WP:AN/I. Deletion has been prevented, and please feel free to remove the notice. However, it would nonetheless be helpful to add some additional information and references.DGG (talk) 18:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

fi.wikipedia
Lopettaisitko vainoamiseni siellä, kiitos --Juhko (talk | contribs) 16:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Jetman! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:24, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Charles Louis Joseph Vandame -
 * 2) Taiska -
 * 3) Tuula Kallioniemi -
 * 4) Ingrid Luterkort -
 * 5) Henry Bauchau -
 * 6) Vicky Rosti -
 * 7) Reijo Mäki -
 * 8) Matti Yrjänä Joensuu -

äpäivää
haluann eston pois tai ikuisen eston. sinäsnsä tunnukseni kohtalolla suomenkielisessä wikiepdiassa ei ole väliä koska muokkaan enemmän englanninkielisessä wikipediassa,jossa minulla on rollback-oikeudet.jos positatte eston niin lupaan olla kommentoimatta tätä paskaa yhelläkään asnalla jos te teette samoin.jos annatete ikueston juhkotunnukselle niin lupaan olla soktematta.josj ette anna niin keirrän estoa ja teen välillä järkevii muokakuseki ja vittukohtasuekn iskiessä sotken.äsekinn vittukohtaus johtuio vittunttumisestani otrfaninjj käytämn tekos yhnyn palautsoiekeushakemuskeni hylkäämiseen mutta siktli ei viitseinyt sanoa PÄN NAAMAA oikeaa syytä sinä oot paska käyttäj.vittutaa se että tullan käjlkeejnpäin vasta antamaan niin vitusit kiiotoseta "hyvästä tysötä" joka vaikeutettiin mahdollisimman paljon kokj aika kun olin juhkotunnusekl täl.ja annetaa esto ja tullaan sit pyytämällä pyytämään takas muokkaa.nJOS saan pyytää ninn päättäkää jo. Juhko ??? 21:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Voisitko ehkä lähettää saman viestin vaikka tuossa päivällä hieman huolellisemmin kirjoitettuna? --Jetman (talk) 21:05, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Älä lähde keskustelemaan vandaalien kanssa. Ennemmin voisi ottaa täällä yhteyttä ylläpitäjään. Joku häiriköintiviesti tullut näemmä minullekin, mutta nyt ei jaksa poistaa. --Otrfan (talk) 22:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Sinänsä tunnukseni kohtalolla suomenkielisessä Wikipediassa ei ole merkitystä, koska viihdyn hyvin vandalismin torjujana täällä en-wikissä, jossa minulla on rollback-oikeudet. Jos poistatte eston tai lyhennätte sitä, niin lupaan olla kommentoimatta tätä jupakkaa sanallakaan, mikäli fi-Wikipedian käyttäjistö suostuu samaan. Alkaessani sotkea päättömästi fi-wikiä, minua vitutti käytännön vastaisen eston jälkeen saamani pyynnöt usealta käyttäjältä jatkaa toimintaa (vandalismin torjuntaa erityisesti), vaikka vandalismin torjuntaa yritettiin kohdallani vaikeuttaa kaikin keinoin. Viimeisimmän rauhan yrityksen aikana myönnän kiivastuneeni liian helposti, ja jos sanani eivät kääntyisi itseäni vastaan, vetoaisin mielenvikaisuuteen. Sitä vastoin haluan nimeltä mainitsemattomien käyttäjien myöntävän käyttäytyneensä vittumaisesti. Jos nyt neljään vuoteen pidennetyn eston poisto/lyhentäminen ei tule kysymykseen, yritän lopettaa ainakin sotkennan. Järkeviä muokkauksia minulla on estoaikana ollut arviolta noih 1000 kpl. Allekirjoittanut Juhko ??? 22:19, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

siis vituttaa kun ensin intetään vastausta omaan viestiin JA sit ei vaivauduta lukee ees. vituta´?! allekirjoituksen unohtanut: Juhko (SIIS DAA?) 20:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Otrfan myös lopettaa hh:iden kirjoittelun kiitos! DAA?--Juhko (SIIS DAA?) 21:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Question
Yhäkö sää pelkäät sitä otrfaniiaahhhh?--Juhko (SIIS DAA?) 21:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Moi
Juhkolla on hulluuskohtaus päällä tällä hetkellä kuten eilenkin myöäskin. Anteeksi wnb heärö paskasuolisto. Ah ma kuolen. Sinä toivot niin etkö? Saatana! --Juhko (SIIS DAA?) 21:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nasida Ria


The article Nasida Ria has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A7 -- no indicia of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 05:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Myra Nicholson


The article Myra Nicholson has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY, see WP:1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 14:50, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Emma Bolger for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma Bolger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Emma Bolger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Irmgard von Stephani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irmgard von Stephani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Irmgard von Stephani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Finnish supercentenarians has been nominated for discussion
Category:Finnish supercentenarians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — JFG talk 13:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Tuvaluans


The article List of Tuvaluans has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This is just some random list of people. It doesn't list all the notable people in Tuvalu. There are much, much more Tuvalu bio-articles. If it was a list of lists, then I wouldn't PROD"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 🌴Koridas🌴 (Negotiate) 06:57, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Kidney cancer survivors has been nominated for deletion
Category:Kidney cancer survivors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 18:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kimmo Nevonmaa


The article Kimmo Nevonmaa has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability, a google search shows little results."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)