User talk:Jetpants

Dear Jetpants,

your recent edit to the Extended Validation Certificate matches my own observations about EV certificate usage, but without any sources this information is impossible to verify. As per WP:NOR, original research without sources should be removed from Wikipedia. Also, when I search for possible sources I get conflicting evidence (e.g., Chrome 69 supposedly was removing UI distinction for EV certificates, but I just check a EV site (comodo.com) and the desktop Chrome 74 UI was there.)

The sentence "Of the ten most popular websites online, none use EV certificates and the trend is away from their usage" looks like original research to me. Perhaps you refer to this Tweet: https://twitter.com/troyhunt/status/885757111182934017/photo/1

I suggest adding verifiable sources and removing all unsupported information.