User talk:Jetro223

Welcome!
Hello, Jetro223, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as SpikeTime, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mean as custard (talk) 14:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of SpikeTime


The article SpikeTime has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mean as custard (talk) 14:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SpikeTime


A tag has been placed on SpikeTime requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - MrX 14:32, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

spiketime article, lists
Hello,

I see that you added spiketime to Comparison of time tracking software, which was removed for being a red link, then created a page for it and re-added it. The article was deleted and I've just removed it again from the comparison. This is a common and frustrating scenario, so I thought I'd leave a message in the hope you will stick around and help to improve Wikipedia.

A brief explanation: Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it's important for it to have some quasi-objective standards for what should and should not be the subject of an article, rather than relying on individual editors' subjective determinations of importance. As a tertiary source that does not contain original research, Wikipedia relies on secondary sources like books, magazines, and newspapers for determinations of what is and is not "notable." In general this means that a subject is fit for an article if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

The same is true for items in lists. There are exceptions, but the rule of thumb is that because non-notable articles are deleted fairly quickly most of the time, we can assume something is notable if (and only if) it is already the subject of an article. Hence the essay "write the article first".

A full explanation of these criteria can be found at Notability.

Let me know if you have questions. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  16:02, 6 June 2014 (UTC)