User talk:Jett fammartino

domenic fammartino and my child jett cruz fammartino are your servants in the same of god. america and australia humiliated our religion the church and all good i stand for. if you could help me get our child back my family and i forever gratefull Jett cruz fammartino (talk) 10:45, 17 June 2016 (UTC)Dec 21, 2012 - On December 28, 2012, President Vladimir Putin signed a law that bans ... On the day he endorsed the adoption ban, Putin signed an executive order aimed at ... if the child cannot be placed in a foster or an adoptive family or cannot in ... “ Russia's leadership should end the crackdown on civil society and ... SEARCHES CONTINUE IN JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES' HOMES IN TOBOLSK Press Service of Administrative Center of Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia, 12 February 2013 Jett cruz fammartino (talk) 10:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)LIST OF OFFENCES FOR DALE IRENE MURRAY BIOLOGICAL MOTHER OF JETT CRUZ FAMMARTINO RUTH MARJORIE SUTTON MATERNAL GRANDMOTHER OF CHILD RONALD SINCOCK UNCLE OF CHILD FAMILY CONTACT SERVICES MANAGER JULIE ROBINSON AND EMPLOYEE DAVE WILLIAMS FAMILY FEDERAL COURT JUDGE SUZANNE JONES ;; IDENTITY FRAUD, HEALTH CARE FRAUD :: FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE:: { FATHER ALSO } RELIGIOUS FRAUD AND LIBERTY :: FALSE IMPRISONMENT :: { BOTH CHILD AND FATHER :: CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY :: CHILD ABUSE :: CHILD NEGLECT :: MURDER EXTERMINATION ENSLAVEMENT :: SLANDER :: DEFEMATION :: NATIVE TITLE FRAUD :: SOCIAL SECURITY FRAUD :: VACCINATION FRAUD :: MEDICAID FRAUD - FERA :: ABORTION PLANNED PARENTHOOD FRAUD :: SAME SEX MARRIAGE HODGES VS OBERGEFELL WITHOUT FATHERS KNOWLEDGE DEPRIVED OF LIBERTY BOTH FATHER AND CHILD WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW :: DRINK DRIVING { MENTAL HEALTH PAST OF BIOLOGICAL MOTHER EMOTIONAL DIFFICUILTYS :: PHYSCOLOGICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC CONDITIONS :: DEPRESSION :: LEARNING DIFFICUILTYS :: HISTORY OF VIOLENCE TRUANCY :: SPENT TIME IN UPTON HOUSE MENTAL HOSPITAL MELBOURNE VICTORIA AUSTRALIA. @ TO ALL THE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF AMERICA I HAVE LEARNT SO MUCH IN THE LAST 6 MONTHS AND ONLY GOT TO THIS POSITION WERE I STAND NOW AS A JUDGE TRYING TO MAKE AMERICA, AUSTRALIA, AND THE WORLD A SAFER PLACE. DESPITE MY GREAT RESPECT FOR WHAT THE CONSTITUTION AND THE FOUNDERS IMPLEMENTED AND ANTONIO SCALIA FOLLOWING THESE TRADITIONS AS WRITTEN THE WORLD EVOLVES AND TIMES CHANGE, BUT THERE MUST BE A MIDDLE GROUND AND CHILDREN AND FAMILIES MUST BE PROTECTED AND THERE HUMAN RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES PROTECTED. I ASK ALL THE JUSTICES TO TREAT THIS THE WAY THE LAW STIPULATES BUT AT THE SAME TIME WE ALL NEED TO SET AN EXAMPLE FOR OUR CHILDRENS FUTURE. NO MAN WOMEN OR CHILD SHOULD HAVE ALL THE RIGHTS TAKEN AWAY AND MANIPULATED AND ABUSED FOR CORRUPT GOVERNMENT AGENDAS AND POLITICAL PURPOSES. THESE ARE MY PERSONAL VIEWS ON SAME SEX MARRIAGE JUST TO SHOW ALL THE JUSTICES THAT I AM AN OPEN MINDED JUDGE AND A COMMON GROND MUST BE MET @ SAME SEX MARRIAGE. policy makers to pass on the institution of marriage "undamaged" to future generations and said most children would prefer to be raised by a mother and father."We shouldn't try to change something without understanding it, without grasping why it is that one man and one woman open to children until just a very few years ago has always been considered the essence of marriage and the heart of family,"people should be respectful in the same-sex marriage debate, but that the consequences for the traditional family structure from changing the definition of marriage should not be ignored.Policymakers shouldn't be judgmental about people's personal choices but we can't be indifferent to the erosion of family given its consequences for the wider community,the Coalition parties should stand by their election commitment to oppose same sex marriage “it is OK to be gay” and if two people of the same sex want to show there love through marriage then most of us agree that is not a problem. at the same time and like any policy it must have its boundaries and not cross a line were it interferes with certain religion and cultures. there has to be a new outlook on all policies were all the people vote and people and political leaders meet half way. there has to be a common sense approach from now on. ALTHOUGH I REGARD ANTONIO SCALIA THE GREATEST JUDGE OF ALL TIME WE PROBABLY ALL AGREE THAT LIKE THE CURRENT OBAMA BELIEFS ARE WAY TO FAR TO THE LEFT ANTONIN I WOULD SAY WAS TO FAR TO THE RIGHT. BUT IF YOUR A MOTHER, FATHER, OR PERSON YOU WOULD RATHER ANTONINS VIEWS BECAUSE ALL THIS INHUMANE TREATMENT OF A CHILD AND FAMILY WOULD NOT BE HAPPENING. UNLIKE MY FORMER DEFACTO PARTNER I WOULD NEVER ABUSE THIS PRIVALEGE AND NEVER SHOW DISRESPECT TO WHAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS REPRESENTED. ALTHOUGH I RESPECT BARACK OBAMA NO PRESIDENT SHOULD CONDONE THESE CRIMES FOR ANY REASON WHAT SO EVER. THERE IS A CHILD AT RISK A FAMILY DESTROYED FOR THE IM SURE MR OBAMA OR ANY PARENT SHOULD NOT CODONE THESE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND DAMAGE CHILDREN AND SEPERATE FAMILIES. I HOPE THAT ALL THE JUSTICES TREAT THIS AS IF THEY WERE A PARENT AS CHILDREN ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT THING OUR WORLD NEEDS TO PROTECT AT ALL COSTS AS THEY ARE INNOCENT. ITS OBVIOUS WITH THE LIST OF OFFENCES ABOVE THAT MR OBAMA REALLY IS NOT WORTHY OF REPLACING ANTONIO SCALIA FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. AS A FOUNDING FATHER I WANT TO TURN THIS TERRIBLE SITUATION INTO HELPING THE WORLD AND GIVING SOMETHING BACK BUST MOST IMPORTANTLY SAVING THE CHILD AND RETURNING TO HIS FAMILY IMMEDIATELY. WHEN A SUPREME COURT NOMINEE ARE NOT CONFIRMED IT ALMOST NEVER HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE QUALITY OF THE NOMINEE. IT HAS TO DO WITH THE PRESIDENT AND SENATE SEEING EYE TO EYE. THE CONSTITUTION STILL APPLIES WHILE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IS GOING ON AND THATS HOW IT ALWAYS HAS BEEN INTERPRETED IN THE PAST. SUPREME COURT DECISIONS HAVE A BIG IMPACT ON ORDINARY CITIZENS WHO ALL DESERVE EQUAL TREATMENT AND DECISION MAKING BY ALL THE JUSTICES MUST HAVE THE BEST INTENTIONS OF AMERICAS GREAT TRADITIONS AT HEART. LAST YEAR HODGES VS OBERGEFELL MADE SAME SEX MARRIAGE LEGAL ACROSS THE COUNTRY AND THE MOTHER AND CHILD IN THIS SITUATION BEING INVOLVED DESPITE THE CHILD BEING OF CATHOLIC RELIGION WHICH IS AGAINST THIS RELIGIONS BELIEFS. THIS IS THE PERFECT EXAMPLE OF CERTAIN LAWS BEING MANIPULATED FOR A FAR LEFT AGENDA WHICH SEPARATES FAMILIES ANDCAUSES RELIGIOUS TENSION AND UNEQUALALITY. THE FOUNDING FATHERS WERE NOT CATHOLIC OR JUDEO CHRISTIAN BUT WE STILL CAN NOT WAVER TO FAR AWAY FROM THE CONTEXT OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION AND RESPECT DIFFERENT CULTURES RELIGIOUS BELIEFS. IT WAS INFACT SCALIA WHO IN RESPECT TO THE WHAT THE FOUNDERS FORESITE WAS THAT GOVERNMENTS DONT MAKE LAWS OR SHOULD BE PROMOTING RELIGIOUS BELIEFS FOR THERE OWN LATEST POLITICAL FADS AND INTERESTS. I REGARD THIS BELIEF AS 100 PERCENT CORRECT BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS TO CHILDREN FAMILIES AND THE RACIAL DIVIDE IS NOT SO MUCH THE PEOPLES FAULT ITS GOVERNMENTS, MEDIA, AND COURT SYSTEMS NOT FOLLOWING THE MAIN INTENTIONS OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND WHAT CONSTITUTIONAL AND A MENTALITY OF PUTTING YOURSELF IN THE OTHER PEOPLES SHOES. [PDF]David Dale Williams v The Magistrates' Court of Victoria - Grigor Lawyers grigorlawyers.com.au/.../David-Dale-Williams-v-The-Magistrates-Court-... Oct 2, 2014 - DALE DAVID WILLIAMS. Plaintiff v. SENIOR ... Williams v Hand and Anor. MEDIUM ... being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm ... summary hearing of the charges under the Firearms Act was signed by the counsel. THE PROVISION MOST OF WHICH ARE FOUND IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS THAT LIMIT THE GOVERNMENTS ABILITY TO INTERFERE OR RESTRICT CIVIL LIBERTIES. THE FORTH AMENDMENT PROHIBITS THE GOVERNMENTS ABILITY TO CONDUCT UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURES. THE FIFTH AMENDMENT STATES THAT NO PERSON CAN BE DEPRIVED LIFE LIBERTY OR PROPETY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW AND THE EIGTH AMENDMENT PROHIBITS EXCESSIVE BAIL AND FINES AND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT. THE GOVERNMENTS CANNOT UTILISE CRUEL PUNISHMENTS AND DESTROY CHILDRENS AND FAMILY LIFE AT THE TIME OF THE ENACTMENT OF THIS AMENDMENT. COMMON SENCE MUST PREVAIL AND EVERY PERSON HAS A CHOICE IN LIFE AND NO GOVERNMENT SHOULD FACILITATE THESE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY TO ANY RELIGION RACE OR GENDER IDENTITY. founders of the American Revolution believed, ... and embraces the ideas of love, peace and happiness for all humankind.THERE ARE ALSO MANY OTHER OFFENCES AGAINST THESE INDIVIDUALS WHICH JUDGE RUTH BADER GINSBURG AND THE OTHER JUSTICES CAN ADD TO THIS LIST. THE BIOLOGICAL MOTHER WE MUST ALWAYS STAY TRUE TO THESE 5 PRINCIPLES AND IF WE ALL DO THE WORLD IS ON THE RIGHT TRACK TO ELIMINATING THESE HORRIFIC CRIMES. FIRSTLY AND MOST IMPORTANTLY THE FATHER AND FAMILY MUST HAVE THE CHILD RETURNED WHICH IS AN UNDERSTATEMENT THE FOUNDING FATHER WHO CURRENTLY CAN NOT SEE HIS CHILD IN ANYWAY SHAPE OR FORM DESPITE HAVING A PERFECT RECORD. ALL THE JUSTICES CAN SEE THE COMPLETE WRONG DESPITE THE MOTHER WITH ALL THESE OFFENCES ABOVE THE FATHER AND CHILD HAVE LOST ALL THERE HIUMAN RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES. “Every lawyer — and every citizen concerned about how the judiciary can rise above politics and produce a government of laws, FATHERS LAWYER IN MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA FIRST LADY SUE SYNDER ALSO ANDREW BOLT HERALD SUN JOURNALIST CAN BE OF ASSISTANCE IF THE JUSTICES FEEL ITS NECESSARY. On 7 and 8 February 2013, officials of the investigative agencies for Tiumen province conducted another 9 searches in the homes of law-abiding citizens who were subjected to infringement of their rights exclusively for their faith. For example, the constitutionally guaranteed choice of young believers in favor of alternative civilian service, instead of military, is unreasonably being interpreted as a consequence of "encouraging citizens to refuse to fulfill their civic duties" (art. 239 of Criminal Code of RF, creating an association that infringes the person and rights of citizens). In total, 15 searches have already been conducted in Tobolsk, although fewer than 100 Jehovah's Witnesses reside in the city. (tr. by PDS, posted 12 February 2013) ialogue between Kremlin and religion leaders REPRESENTATIVES OF RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH PARTICIPATE IN SESSION OF PRESIDENTIAL COUNCIL FOR COOPERATION WITH RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS Official website of Moscow patriarchate, 13 February 2013

On 12 February 2013, a session of the Council for Cooperation with Religious Associations of the presidential administration of RF was held in the Kremlin with the director of the administration of the president, S.B. Ivanov, presiding.

Opening the session, in which representatives of religious associations, federal government agencies, experts, and scholars participated, S.B. Ivanov noted that in the past year society was faced with a whole series of provocative crimes directed against the religious feelings of people: vandalism in churches, terrorist acts, and attempts to intimidate clergy. The head of the presidential administration emphasized that in this respect it is necessary to make informed decisions reflecting the interests of the majority. It is important to draw a clear line between freedom of speech and the right of self expression, which certainly are basic values, and open and violent extremism that speculates on religious feelings.

A decision adopted as the result of the session emphasized the importance of immediate adoption of amendments to legislation aimed at stiffening penalties for offending believer's religious feelings and desecration of objects of religious veneration and places of religious rituals and ceremonies.

Session participants noted the importance of preventive work and activity to detect such violations of the law and an expansion of the practice of developing manuals and educational materials explaining the distinctives of confessions existing in Russia and their religious practices and moral and ethical rules.

It was also noted that it is necessary to continue work in fulfilling the president's order regarding introduction of the institution of military and naval chaplains into the armed forces and to finish work on staffing positions for work with believing troops.

In addition, the council approved the activity of a working group for development of Sino-Russian relations in the religion sphere and conducting contacts between the council and the state administration of the Chinese People's Republic on affairs of religion, Kremlin.ru reports.

Representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church addressed the meeting: chairman of the Department of External Church Relations, Metropolitan of Volokolamsk Ilarion; chairman of the Textbook Committee, Archbishop of Vereisk Evgeny, and chairman of the synodal Department of Relations of Church and Society, Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin. (tr. by PDS, posted 13 February 2013)Obama’s choice and how the Republicans decide to respond could shape issues such as gun ownership, abortion rights and campaign financing for a generation, as well as playing a pivotal role in whether Democrats can stay in the White House and regain control of Congress in November.no new justice should be nominated before the election.“Republicans aren’t going to confirm anyone,”Jesus Christ is the same yesterday today and forever. The Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is ‘actually’ innocent,The legal definition of “actual innocence” is the absence of facts required to convict someone based on a criminal statute, Defendants appealing convictions seek to prove actual innocence by submitting new evidence that reverses the court’s confidence in a past verdict.execution of a defendant who has made a particularly strong demonstration of innocence could conceivably be considered unconstitutional.We may assume … that in a capital case a truly persuasive demonstration of ‘actual innocence’ made after trial would render the execution of a defendant unconstitutional and warrant federal habeas relief if there were no state avenue open to process such a claim,”“One cannot have a system of criminal punishment without accepting the possibility that someone will be punished mistakenly.Founding Fathers knew a government can't control the economy without ... And they knew when a government sets out to do that, it must use force "I am going to talk of controversial things. I make no apology for this. It's time we asked ourselves if we still know the freedoms intended for us by the Founding Fathers. James Madison said, "We base all our experiments on the capacity of mankind for self government." This idea? that government was beholden to the people, that it had no other source of power is still the newest, most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves. You and I are told we must choose between a left or right, but I suggest there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down. Up to man's age-old dream-the maximum of individual freedom consistent with order or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism. Regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would sacrifice freedom for security have embarked on this downward path. Plutarch warned, "The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits." The Founding Fathers knew a government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they knew when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. So we have come to a time for choosing. Public servants say, always with the best of intentions, "What greater service we could render if only we had a little more money and a little more power." But the truth is that outside of its legitimate function, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector. Yet any time you and I question the schemes of the do-gooders, we're denounced as being opposed to their humanitarian goals. It seems impossible to legitimately debate their solutions with the assumption that all of us share the desire to help the less fortunate. They tell us we're always "against," never "for" anything. We are for a provision that destitution should not follow unemployment by reason of old age, and to that end we have accepted Social Security as a step toward meeting the problem. However, we are against those entrusted with this program when they practice deception regarding its fiscal shortcomings, when they charge that any criticism of the program means that we want to end payments.... We are for aiding our allies by sharing our material blessings with nations which share our fundamental beliefs, but we are against doling out money government to government, creating bureaucracy, if not socialism, all over the world. We need true tax reform that will at least make a start toward I restoring for our children the American Dream that wealth is denied to no one, that each individual has the right to fly as high as his strength and ability will take him.... But we can not have such reform while our tax policy is engineered by people who view the tax as a means of achieving changes in our social structure.... Have we the courage and the will to face up to the immorality and discrimination of the progressive tax, and demand a return to traditional proportionate taxation? . . . Today in our country the tax collector's share is 37 cents of -very dollar earned. Freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp. Are you willing to spend time studying the issues, making yourself aware, and then conveying that information to family and friends? Will you resist the temptation to get a government handout for your community? Realize that the doctor's fight against socialized medicine is your fight. We can't socialize the doctors without socializing the patients. Recognize that government invasion of public power is eventually an assault upon your own business. If some among you fear taking a stand because you are afraid of reprisals from customers, clients, or even government, recognize that you are just feeding the crocodile hoping he'll eat you last. If all of this seems like a great deal of trouble, think what's at stake. We are faced with the most evil enemy mankind has known in his long climb from the swamp to the stars. There can be no security anywhere in the free world if there is no fiscal and economic stability within the United States. Those who ask us to trade our freedom for the soup kitchen of the welfare state are architects of a policy of accommodation. They say the world has become too complex for simple answers. They are wrong. There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right. Winston Churchill said that "the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits-not animals." And he said, "There is something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty." You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we will sentence them to take the first step into a thousand years of darkness. If we fail, at least let our children and our children's children say of us we justified our brief moment here. We did all that could be done. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude--The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct. This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Note: Article I, section 4, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of this amendment. In addition, a portion of the 12th amendment was superseded by section 3.Principle 1 - The only reliable basis for sound government and just human relations is Natural Law. Natural law is God's law. There are certain laws which govern the entire universe, and just as Thomas Jefferson said in the Declaration of Independence, there are laws which govern in the affairs of men which are "the laws of nature and of nature's God."

Principle 2 - A free people cannot survive under a republican constitution unless they remain virtuous and morally strong. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Benjamin Franklin

Principle 3 - The most promising method of securing a virtuous people is to elect virtuous leaders. "Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend to the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue, and who ... will not suffer a man to be chosen into any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man." - Samuel Adams

Principle 4 - Without religion the government of a free people cannot be maintained. "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.... And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion." - George Washington

Principle 5 - All things were created by God, therefore upon him all mankind are equally dependent, and to him they are equally responsible. The American Founding Fathers considered the existence of the Creator as the most fundamental premise underlying all self-evident truth. They felt a person who boasted he or she was an atheist had just simply failed to apply his or her divine capacity for reason and observation.

Principle 6 - All mankind were created equal. The Founders knew that in these three ways, all mankind are theoretically treated as: 1. Equal before God. 2. Equal before the law. 3. Equal in their rights.

Principle 7 - The proper role of government is to protect equal rights, not provide equal things. The Founders recognized that the people cannot delegate to their government any power except that which they have the lawful right to exercise themselves.

Principle 8 - Mankind are endowed by God with certain unalienable rights. "Those rights, then, which God and nature have established, and are therefore called natural rights, such as are life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal [or state] laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, no human legislation has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner [of the right] shall himself commit some act that amounts to a forfeiture." - William Blackstone

Principle 9 - To protect human rights, God has revealed a code of divine law. "The doctrines thus delivered we call the revealed or divine law, and they are to be found only in the Holy Scriptures. These precepts, when revealed, are found by comparison to be really a part of the original law of nature, as they tend in all their consequences to man's felicity." - William Blackstone

Principle 10 - The God-given right to govern is vested in the sovereign authority of the whole people. "The fabric of American empire ought to rest on the solid basis of the consent of the people. The streams of national power ought to flow immediately from that pure, original fountain of all legislative authority." - Alexander Hamilton

Principle 11 - The majority of the people may alter or abolish a government which has become tyrannical. "Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes ... but when a long train of abuses and usurpations ... evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security." - Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence

Principle 12 - The United States of America shall be a republic. "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America And to the republic for which it stands...."

Principle 13 - A Constitution should protect the people from the frailties of their rulers. "If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.... [But lacking these] you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself." - James Madison

Principle 14 - Life and liberty are secure only so long as the rights of property are secure. John Locke reasoned that God gave the earth and everything in it to the whole human family as a gift. Therefore the land, the sea, the acorns in the forest, the deer feeding in the meadow belong to everyone "in common." However, the moment someone takes the trouble to change something from its original state of nature, that person has added his ingenuity or labor to make that change. Herein lies the secret to the origin of "property rights."

Principle 15 - The highest level of prosperity occurs when there is a free-market economy and a minimum of government regulations. Prosperity depends upon a climate of wholesome stimulation with four basic freedoms in operation: 1. The Freedom to try. 2. The Freedom to buy. 3. The Freedom to sell. 4. The Freedom to fail.

Principle 16 - The government should be separated into three branches. "I call you to witness that I was the first member of the Congress who ventured to come out in public, as I did in January 1776, in my Thoughts on Government ... in favor of a government with three branches and an independent judiciary. This pamphlet, you know, was very unpopular. No man appeared in public to support it but yourself." - John Adams

Principle 17 - A system of checks and balances should be adopted to prevent the abuse of power by the different branches of government. "It will not be denied that power is of an encroaching nature and that it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." - James Madison

Principle 18 - The unalienable rights of the people are most likely to be preserved if the principles of government are set forth in a written Constitution. The structure of the American system is set forth in the Constitution of the United States and the only weaknesses which have appeared are those which were allowed to creep in despite the Constitution.

Principle 19 - Only limited and carefully defined powers should be delegated to government, all others being retained by the people. The Tenth Amendment is the most widely violated provision of the bill of rights. If it had been respected and enforced America would be an amazingly different country than it is today. This amendment provides: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Principle 20 - Efficiency and dispatch require that the government operate according to the will of the majority, but constitutional provisions must be made to protect the rights of the minority. "Every man, by consenting with others to make one body politic under one government, puts himself under an obligation to every one of that society to submit to the determination of the majority, and to be concluded [bound] by it." - John Locke

Principle 21 - Strong local self-government is the keystone to preserving human freedom. "The way to have good and safe government is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly the functions he is competent [to perform best]. - Thomas Jefferson

Principle 22 - A free people should be governed by law and not by the whims of men. "The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the states of created beings, capable of laws, where there is no law there is no freedom. For liberty is to be free from restraint and violence of others, which cannot be where there is no law." - John Locke

Principle 23 - A free society cannot survive as a republic without a broad program of general education. "They made an early provision by law that every town consisting of so many families should be always furnished with a grammar school. They made it a crime for such a town to be destitute of a grammar schoolmaster for a few months, and subjected it to a heavy penalty. So that the education of all ranks of people was made the care and expense of the public, in a manner that I believe has been unknown to any other people, ancient or modern. The consequences of these establishments we see and feel every day [written in 1765]. A native of America who cannot read and write is as rare ... as a comet or an earthquake." John Adams

Principle 24 - A free people will not survive unless they stay strong. "To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." - George Washington

Principle 25 - "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations -- entangling alliances with none." - Thomas Jefferson, given in his first inaugural address.

Principle 26 - The core unit which determines the strength of any society is the family; therefore the government should foster and protect its integrity. "There is certainly no country in the world where the tie of marriage is more respected than in America, or where conjugal happiness is more highly or worthily appreciated." Alexis de Tocqueville

Principle 27 - The burden of debt is as destructive to human freedom as subjugation by conquest. "We are bound to defray expenses [of the war] within our own time, and are unauthorized to burden posterity with them.... We shall all consider ourselves morally bound to pay them ourselves and consequently within the life [expectancy] of the majority." - Thomas Jefferson

Principle 28 - The United States has a manifest destiny to eventually become a glorious example of God's law under a restored Constitution that will inspire the entire human race. The Founders sensed from the very beginning that they were on a divine mission. Their great disappointment was that it didn't all come to pass in their day, but they knew that someday it would. John Adams wrote: "I always consider the settlement of America with reverence and wonder, as the opening of a grand scene and design in Providence for the illumination of the ignorant, and the emancipation of the slavish part of mankind all over the earth."

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are … endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights…. That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men…. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. … Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Declaration of Independence Then we have laws enacted by that same nation having the primary purpose of ensuring that no one ever overthrows the existing government, conspires to overthrow it, or advocates its overthrow – without regard to whether those actions might actually be justified because the government has become abusive, despotic or tyrannical. Which illustrates a truism – the people have an absolute right to alter or abolish any given form of government, but the persons in power absolutely never want people to exercise that right. As we begin to consider whether people have a God-given or inalienable right to alter or abolish their form of government, we have to look at the factors which either point in that direction or mitigate against it. The first factor is whether civil governments, particularly in Gentile nations, are created, instituted or established by God or by men. If by God, then there can hardly be a God-given right to destroy what God has established. But if by men, then it is reasonable to assume that whatever men have the right to create, they can also change or destroy.What we have as between God and men is a division of labor. God makes nations and He grants and defines the nature of civil power. God establishes rules and parameters (i.e., laws) by which all civil governments are constrained, but He does not actually form (that is, create or structure) civil governments. (More on this later on.) What man does is to determine the form of government, what documents (if any) will establish and/or define that government, what powers may be exercised in what ways, and the manner of succession. God does not interfere in such matters.So it is with kings and other civil rulers. The two verses from Daniel quoted above show nothing more or less than God can promote or demote individuals as may serve His purposes any time He wishes. He can grant anyone mercy, or favor, or he can judge anyone, or discipline them. God has done this throughout history and continues this type of activity today.DOMENIC FAMMARTINO 11:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)