User talk:Jetter21

Nomination of British Airways Flight 34 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article British Airways Flight 34 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/British Airways Flight 34 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Petebutt (talk) 11:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FedEx Flight 630


The article FedEx Flight 630 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable aviation incident, maybe a hull loss but no fatalities.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 12:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of FedEx Flight 630 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FedEx Flight 630 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/FedEx Flight 630 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 11:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I'd like to support the retention of the article, but cannot do so at the moment. Please find references for the NTSB's findings and the requirement for changes to be made to about 200 aircraft. Doing so will help boost the case for keeping the article. You might consider adding an "Investigation" section to the article, per other aircrash articles. Don't be discouraged by the AfD nomination. These can sometimes bring about dramatic improvements in an article. If it does get deleted, that's part of editing on Wikipedia. Don't take it personally. I've had nine articles I created deleted, although I was able to get one undeleted when further information came to light. Mjroots (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Warning Copyrighted Images
Some of your uploads have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MilborneOne (talk) 18:28, 5 October 2014 (UTC)