User talk:Jewcer

February 2016
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Larry David has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 05:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Life of Pablo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Life of Pablo was changed by Jewcer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947896 on 2016-02-11T21:57:58+00:00.

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Spider-Man in film has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Spider-Man in film was changed by Jewcer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88147 on 2016-02-14T18:28:22+00:00.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zoolander with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 23:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Cherry Pie (Warrant song) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 23:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 127 Hours has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: 127 Hours was changed by Jewcer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955603 on 2016-03-10T17:52:34+00:00.

May 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kendrick Lamar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kendrick Lamar was changed by Jewcer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930869 on 2016-05-15T22:42:58+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 00:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Stop marking all of your edits as minor
STOP marking all of your edits as minor. A minor edit is one that requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Read Help:Minor edit for more details. When someone makes an edit there is a box to check that it is a minor edit. DO NOT check this box. Inappropriately marking an edit as minor is deceptive and rude to other editors. Repeatedly doing this can result in a block from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 22:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Unblock me, please

 * A lot of the things you marked as minor are just grammatical corrections. Some of them - such as this one - I probably wouldn't have marked as minor, and isn't a grammatical correction. I think a good rule of thumb is that if you feel like you need to explain your edit in the summary using more than a few words... You probably shouldn't be marking it as minor. SQL Query me!  04:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Fair point. I was a tad bit confused; I tended to include lengthier-than-needed summary edits to help illustrate why I felt I was justified in marking the edits as minor. I now see that in doing that, I negated the use of the "minor" check box. I'm not perfect. Can I please continue editing? I just found an incredibly superficial error that I need to correct. I'm going to mark it as minor, but from now on I will only do so when it is appropriate. Jewcer (talk) 04:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * - as the blocking admin - what are your thoughts here? SQL Query me!  05:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 01:43, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.