User talk:Jewido

Donaldson International Airlines
Welcome to Wikipedia - I have reverted your change to a redirect at Donaldson International Airlines as that is the correct name. If you have a reliable source that says it is not then please discuss on the talk page. Also please note that cutting and pasting the content between pages is not the correct way of moving pages as you destroy the history. MilborneOne (talk) 21:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply but the two references on the page both refer to Donaldson International Airlines Limited, have you any other references that are from some official source. MilborneOne (talk) 22:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You are right I have corrected the 707 to 707-321. The Air-Britain Boeing 707 book has Donaldson International Airlines (Donaldson Line (Air Service) Ltd) and the Charles Woodley Bristol Britannia book has Donaldson International Airways ! - Not saying one or the other is right I think we need to do some more research on the name and see if I can find an official source rather than an enthusiast publications. MilborneOne (talk) 22:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Found a legal report in the Edinburgh Gazette (an official government newspaper) which has Donaldson Line (Air Services) Limited trading as Donaldson International Airways. I have moved the article as approporiate. Thanks for your help. MilborneOne (talk) 12:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Maxwell "Max" William Ward
Just looking for your input at Talk:Maxwell "Max" William Ward. Thanks. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 05:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Air charter logo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Air charter logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Air atlantis font.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Air atlantis font.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Air atlantis font.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Air atlantis font.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:30, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

August 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Modiluft without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Serjinh81 $Talk$ 15:29, 6 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Hello Serjinh81, planespotters.net is the only website on that lists HT as IATA designator for Modiluft (without giving any source for that claim). Take a look to the Flight International, Issue April 3-9 1996 (Flightglobal archive) or at Rzjets.net or at airframes.org or at azfreight.com or atlasnavigator.com or the printed JP airline-fleets yearbooks that were published in 1995 and 1996 They all list M9 instead of HT as IATA designator.--Jewido (talk) 12:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Air Ceylon without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Serjinh81 $Talk$ 15:32, 6 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Hello Serjinh81, ICAO switched from its old two-letter-designator-system to the current three-letter-designator-system in late 1987 (source: Yearbook of the United Nations 1987, visible here: ). ICAO codes have been issued since 1947. The ICAO codes originally based on a two-letter-system and were identical to the airline codes used by IATA. After an airline voluntarily joined IATA its existing ICAO-two-letter-code was simply taken over as IATA code. So in the 1970s the abbreviation BA was the ICAO code and the IATA code of British Airways while non-IATA-airlines (mainly cargo- or charter airlines) like Court Line used their 2-letter-abbreviation as ICAO code only. In the early 1980s ICAO presented the current three-letter-system due to the increasing number of airlines. It became the official new ICAO-standard-system in November 1987 while IATA kept the older 2-letter-system introduced by IACO in 1947. It is simply impossible that Air Ceylon (which ceased operations in 1978) or any other airline could have had an ICAO 3-letter-designator (3-letter-code) in the 1970s. The ICAO-code of Air Ceylon was AE - identically to the IATA-code used by the airline (source: JP airline-fleets yearbooks published by Buchair, Switzerland in 1977 and 1978). It's a pitty that you have removed this info from the article, although it was given by a reliable source. --Jewido (talk) 12:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serjinh81 (talk) 15:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism, as you did at Air Ceylon and Modiluft. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Serjinh81 (talk) 15:35 6 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Serjinh81, blocking someone without prior contact shows a bad attitude. I understand that my edits might look like vandalism, at least for people with limited knowledge in aviation history. Due to this I have provided sources for these information. Please ask yourself in future whether the other one could be right before you block him. And please do not remove sources from the articles just because you do not like them or you do not know them. Regards --Jewido (talk) 12:30, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Dohrn wappen klein.jpg


The file File:Dohrn wappen klein.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)