User talk:Jezebel1349

December 2013
Your recent editing history at Madai shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 16:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

3rr warning on Madai
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Madai. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Your next revert, you will be reported for blocking. Blanking properly referenced info repeatedly just because you disagree with it is not considered acceptable here. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 16:12, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You distrupt the article with irrelevant informations and fringe theories. Jezebel1349 (talk) 16:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Attacks on editors
I strongly suggest you familiarize yourself with our basic policies such as not mounting attacks on other editors, other editors' contribs lists etc. or I predict it is you who will find yourself banned in short order. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 16:51, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

ANI Notice (December 2013)
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 00:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 01:04, 7 December 2013 (UTC)