User talk:Jf28

January 2008
Your recent edit to ProSportsDaily (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 03:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to ProSportsDaily (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 03:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to ProSportsDaily (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 03:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to ProSportsDaily (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 04:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to ProSportsDaily (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 04:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied to your Helpme request
The helpme template should have been put here, with a brief question and a link to your edit at ProSportsDaily. Anyway, I have replied there. Astronaut (talk) 04:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Ummm. I see VoABot is still complaining.  Try removing ALL mention of the forums and blogs.  Astronaut (talk) 04:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The thing is, the biggest parts of ProSportsDaily are the forums and blogs


 * The problem is that Wikipedia has a problem with people adding links to social networking sites, blogs and forums, for their own vanity. These links are more often added by anonymous IP accounts or by newly registered users who only edit for a few hours and are never seen again.  Consequently, anonymous and new users are restricted in what they can do (eg. you can't upload images, move pages, or add some kinds of links).  As for the actions of VoABot, I suspect it keeps an eye on recent changes by new users and looks for links that match "blog" or "forum" (and a whole load of other things too).
 * Anyway, it seems my edit has stuck. I suggest you come back in a few days and add some references to replace where I have tagged it with the fact template.  The best way to do this is to add:


 * which will add a reference link like this "[1]"; and if you add to the bottom of the article:

==References==


 * you will get a references section like in other articles. It should be OK to make a couple of references from the forums if they support the information in the article and that information is not available from a more reliable source.
 * Note that I still think naming site admins, moderators and prominent contributors or bloggers is unencyclopedic and would probably be removed by most editors.
 * Astronaut (talk) 05:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand why naming bloggers may be considered unencyclopedic, but not adding the two admins (one who built the site, and the one who basically controls it now)