User talk:Jfernovak

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Kafka Liz (talk) 23:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Empty section at Harvard Art Museum
Hi Jfernovak. I just wanted to ask you about the References section at the Harvard Art Museum article. I removed the section because it doesn't actually contain any references, and the template only works with inline citations. If you're planning on adding either references or footnotes, that would be great, but without them, the section only adds unnecessary clutter. Thanks, Kafka Liz (talk) 17:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Sackler exterior.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sackler exterior.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Jfernovak: I would like to remove this image but I don't know how (I uploaded a smaller vesrion)


 * Well, it appears that it will be deleted after a week anyway, since you haven't provided source and copyright information. So you don't really need to do anything. Hope that helps, Kafka Liz (talk) 20:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Museum images
Where are you getting these images from? J Milburn (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Jfernovak: I work for the Harvard Art Museum. They have been supplied by our Digital Resources Department.


 * Just a couple of things. These are excellent pictures and fine additions to the article, but I think some of them may violate our fair use policy. I'm particularly concerned about the Max Beckmann picture, which is probably not a public domain work (as described here). On the other hand, your position at the holding museum gives you better insight into the work's copyright status. The work was clearly published after 1922; but "if it was published before 1978 and had no copyright notice, or if it was published before 1964 and the copyright was not renewed, it should be in the public domain." So... can you shed any light on its publication date?


 * Also, if it does turn out not to be a free image, you can probably get HAM to grant permission for its use. I'm not trying to be a pain, but Wikipedia takes its image policy quite seriously, and it can be pretty confusing, in my experience. Cheers, Kafka Liz (talk) 21:27, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Sackler_exterior.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sackler_exterior.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sackler red-figure.gif


A tag has been placed on File:Sackler red-figure.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bulwersator (talk) 14:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sackler large bowl.gif
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sackler large bowl.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. moogsi(blah) 00:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Fogg kline high.gif
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fogg kline high.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)