User talk:Jfire/Archive 1

Thanks
Jfire, on Nelson Chan and Tales of the Baroness, the two have been reviewed, and I hope the new info will suffice, if not, I would be more than happy to add on to the two stubs. I'm still reletavily new to all this wikipedia thing, and would much apprichiate your assitance.

Thanks again. Jan 21 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NC7285069 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for looking after Bjørnøya, my former pet article was certainly in need of that type of improvement. Are you new to Wikipedia? Would be great to see more of your work! Merry Christmas and best wishes, Kosebamse (talk) 14:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, IMO it is good enough for GA (in fact it was once a reasonable FA candidate but was not promoted because of a technicality, as the user who had uploaded several pictures has not tagged them under a GFDL-compliant license and did not respond to inquiries). If you look into the talk page, you'll see that the reason for moving it away from the GA list was a similar technicality, and a ridiculous misinterpretation of GA criteria, IMO . Unfortunately there does not seem to be much discussion, and to be honest, one would not expect overly much for such a fringe subject. I'd be delighted to see that article brought into the limelight, but, having written perhaps three thirds of it, I feel that I'm a little too partial to suggest it myself. Merry christmas and a happy new year! Kosebamse (talk) 19:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your exemplary handling of the Deletion discussion on James W. Sire NBeale (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 12:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

J-Hood
Please don't and why would you, its not like I lied about what happened, if anything, can we possibly work together to add info to the page and help expand it. It will not always look like this, you know.

Thank You, Signshare December 27, 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Signshare (talk • contribs) 16:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Friedia Niimura
relax man¡¡...The page is "under construction"...I guess I take some days to make something good. be pattient --Maestrotaku (talk) 16:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Bhutto
Please see Talk:Bilawal Bhutto Zardari.--JamesDS (talk) 01:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete things too quickly
Mr fire,

right then. i have studied these and i believe my article met the criteria. not everything on Wikipedia is a totally 100% verifiable, if you deny that you are kidding yourself. i believe it is fairly notable, more so than many things on this site,and how would one judge that anyway? have you never been greeted with the Manhug? it would surprise me if you have not been. as for verifiability, you can see it on the street, often when two guys meet, such as after a long separation, or if they are family, something along the lines of a Manhug is exchanged. perhaps the name is not entirely "politically correct" but if that was your only problem with it there should have been no argument. as for reliable sources, i must go again to common sense. have you never been greeted this way? or seen hundreds of others greet each other with the Manhug? i sincerely doubt it. there is no concrete evidence that Homer existed, and yet you allow a Wikipedia article on him. so i must ask: why did you delete this page? if you doubt the existence of the Manhug go try it on someone and they will inevitably return it without missing a beat. i see from your talk page that you are into deleting things. i also enjoy the fact that you not only marked my article, but marked it for immediate deletion, therby giving it no fair chance. i find this unsporting.

i do apologize for my manner, it shall not happen again.

P.S. since i believe that the manhug was a ligitimate article perhaps i shall re-create it. thank you for the advice!

Fag an Ballach

Rockpiper —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockpiper (talk • contribs)

Isla de Tagomago
Hey, do you think Isla de Tagomago passes WP:N? It has an article on the Spanish Wikipedia, anyway.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 04:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Reply at Talk:Isla de Tagomago. Jfire (talk) 04:51, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

FreeCreditReport.com
Hi. I think you jumped the gun on tagging FreeCreditReport.com for deletion. In the United States this is a very well known site. I see that you are new to the site, I ask that you take a little bit of time exploring a page on New Page Patrol, maybe google search it, before tagging it for speedy deletion. thanks.--CastAStone//(talk) 05:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Tim De Groot
Deletion of Tim De Groot, artist and musician from Grand Rapids, MI I believe that you are in error of recommending this man for deletion, although not nationally known, in the GR area he is quite well known. He is personal friends with no less than three of the individuals who are also listed under the same heading; Mark Hekman, Paul Collins and Richard DeVos. Incidentally, Tim attended the Kendall School of Art and Design with Maynard James Keenan, yet Maynard is listed under Grand Rapids; and Maynard to this day doesn't acknowledge ever being from Grand Rapids. To keep in the tradition that Wikipedia is supposed to be about, research. Those researching Grand Rapids ought to know about Tim De Groot. This in NOT a vanity posting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KingSethos (talk • contribs) 01:36, 30 December 2007

It appears to be fixed nevermind

sderenzi 71.201.135.173 (talk) 09:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

nevermind

Kwesi Amoafo-Yeboah
Mr Kwesi Amoafo-Yeboah is one of the brain behind the introduction of the Western Union money transfer service in Ghana and West Africa. He is the chairman and founder of i-Tel Ghana Limited and the chairman of Telligent Wireless Limited, 2 reputable telecommunications companies in Ghana. Mr Kwesi Amoafo-Yeboah is an independent candidate for the 2008 Presidential Elections in Ghana. Maybe he deserves a page on wikipedia.org

Thanks for reconsidering his article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yamentoulionnel (talk • contribs) 11:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of A Ticket for Perpetual Locomotion
An article that you have been involved in editing, A Ticket for Perpetual Locomotion, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 22:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * With regards to simply redirecting as an alternative to AfD'ing an article: you can always do that, but of course someone else might revert it, and then you've got a dispute that needs to be resolved somehow. But with such a.. shall we say, "untrafficked" article as this, it's unlikely that an objection will be raised. :-) --Stormie (talk) 08:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Annie Leonard
I see you have removed the hangon tag from Annie Leonard. You indicated this as no one nominated it for deletion. Perhaps you didn't see where it was deleted twice today, within mere minutes of creating and in the middle of editing the article? Sometimes I think some wikipedia editors are much, much too quick with the mop. Bstone (talk) 18:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The article in that form had not been nominated, and with the tags, it's not likely to. Note that adding  itself actually adds the article to the list of articles nominated for deletion. Jfire (talk) 19:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The last couple of edits looked like he was deleting sections.
I'll go over the edits and revert if I was wrong. HalfShadow (talk) 04:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Adam (cat)
Just to let you know that the same user has recreated the page post deletion. Harry was a white dog with black spots (talk) 19:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up; user is now blocked. Jfire (talk) 19:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Money as Debt I have explained why Money as Debt is notable. You may check the reference if you please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hsriniva

Notability guideline on Wikipedia. " It is a generally accepted standard that all editors should follow. However, it is not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception. When editing this page, ensure that your revision reflects consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page.". The article has been deleted. It was about an open educational documentary. It is a pity it has been deleted. I would recommend you try to watch it and may be add an article of your own. (talk • contribs) 19:49, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Child Health International
I added some newspaper articles as references to Child Health International. --Eastmain (talk) 04:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tom Vogt
Uh looks like I still messed up the nomination somehow. There was already a response on the page when I got there but I think it has been updated by now. Let me know if I still need to fix anything. Thanks. Spatulacity (talk) 20:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good at this point. Jfire (talk) 20:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Dexter Lehtinen
Callelinea has re-added his bogus references to Dexter Lehtinen. Corvus cornix talk  07:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Could you please review the article again and see who is in-correct me or Corvus? Callelinea (talk) 07:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for (consolidate ref) I would never of known how to do that.Callelinea (talk) 07:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Would this satisfy the copywrite vio? Other problems brought up in his confirmation ordeal were according to the Time Magazine article "...The Miami Herald articles revealing details of Lehtinen's personal life. The paper reported on a deposition from his former wife, who swore that before their 1982 separation he hurled a television set across a room, bashed through doors and shoved her around. The Herald also said Lehtinen sprained the arm of his girlfriend, former legislative aide Dolores Zell, by pushing her to the floor". Callelinea (talk) 08:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Joseph Giardina
Hello JFire... I don't know who you are, you do not know who I am, but it seems you know nothing about Joseph Giardina, Maria Callas and dozen of other world famous singers... ALT/STOP!! Since someone else before you (or maybe it had been you in disguise!...:-)...) had tagged Joseph Giardina's biography saying it needed references/citations, I wasted some of my time and put a couple, including the one of Salem College... where he is mentioned as one of the most famous vocal trainers living in Italy... I also put some links to rare photos of Joseph Giardina... just to show what this little GREAT man looks like... You know, there are people who, in their field, are famous all other the world, but you will not find one single link with their name and surname on the world wide web... My father for example set up companies that deal with 60% of the total world production in that field, with offices and warehouses in Taiwan, Moscow, South Africa, Europe etc. and you won't find any reference to him on one single page of the WWW world wide web. I hope that someone doesn't tag the Rolls Royce page saying it needs citations or that it seems to be noticeable but has no references... PS: I live in Rome, where Joseph Giardina lives... and I obviously know him "in carne e ossa" (personally), as a human being and as master and director of choirs I have been in for years. Ciao da Roma, Jwadeinthewater —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.25.196.78 (talk) 13:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I guess you are referring to this. You're right that I don't have the slightest knowledge of Joseph Giardina, which is why I tagged the article as needing attention from an expert, and I well aware that not all notable persons have information available online, which is why I wrote in the edit summary "seems to be notable, but I can't find any RS". RS stands for reliable sources. Note that personal knowledge is not a reliable source according to Wikipedia's definition of the term. Jfire (talk) 16:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Removal of notability tags
Hi! Can you lend a hand here? You and I have both asked him to quit removing the notability tags, but he seems resistant. I can't find policy that says 'don't' but I think we both disagree with them being removed for the same reaosns. Thanks! Travellingcari (talk) 21:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/List of claims made by Zeitgeist, the Movie

 * I just created this page a week ago Friday (Jan 25) and so far I have been the only editor of this page, but I would like to avoid having it deleted in the hope that other editors will collaborate on it with me.


 * I want to let you know that many things have changed regarding this article since you voted to have it deleted.
 * I have fully read and responded to every Wikipedia guideline that I have been referred to,
 * I have modified my plans for the article and changed the way I view the subject in order to fit within those guidelines,
 * I have explained my position and my goals in detail on the AfD for the page,
 * and I have completely blanked the talk page of the article since most of the concerns about guidelines involved the talk page and not the actual article.


 * I am sure you will find that I have made a great effort to contribute to the usefulness and quality of Wikipedia, and that my actions are motivated by a desire to improve Wikipedia and to keep Wikipedia neutral.


 * I believe that the only guidelines my article can still be accused of violating are those concerning "notability" and "lists of random facts" and being that this is such a young article, I urge you to revisit the article, the  AfD for the article, as well as the  article's talk page, and make sure that you still feel that the article needs to be deleted right now.


 * Thank-you for your time, and I appreciate your efforts in keeping Wikipedia clutter-free!


 * Sincerely,


 * VegKilla (talk) 23:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Reference Consolidation
Hi! Do you have a tutorial somewhere on the way you consolidated the refs for Curtis Harris? It looks so much cleaner, but I'm not sure I follow exactly. I use either the downloadable "Wikicite" (which generates somewhat cleaner citations in that it does the 1 abc for multiple citations to the same reference) or this tool (which makes a mess!) to do my citations since I haven't memorised the codes yet. Thanks! Travellingcari (talk) 05:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The basic idea is that you can add name="name" to all the tags that reference the same source. Then the actual contents of all but the first named tag will be ignored (so you just use for the rest of them). Footnotes has all the details. I haven't used Wikicite or the other tool, but I think they can probably be used independently of reference consolidation. You would use the tool to generate the first instance of the citation, then give it a name and use the  form thereafter. Jfire (talk) 06:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Got it, thanks. On another note I agree with your PROD on Idoc, I considered that when I was working through "I"s but realised I didn't have enough of an understanding about what it was to know if it was notable, which was why I tagged it for an expert to help. 38.98.64.82 (talk) 18:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Whoops I wasn't signed in, sorry about that Travellingcari (talk) 18:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

My pleasure
Glad I could be of help!. --Montchav (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Saracino
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Saracino, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Saracino is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Saracino, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Bharat Rakshak
Hi! Only after I was able to source some information about this website (the majority of the peacock has been plucked by the time I found it) did I see that you'd speedied it. The speedy was apparently reverted but I'm not sure if you still think it merits deletion. I'm not attached to it, I just found some coverage and added it so it would be sourced while it existed here. Let me know if you want me to take it to AfD. Travellingcari (talk) 16:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No, with those sources and edits I think notability is adequately established. Nice work :) Jfire (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I had fun with it. Was one that came up in the backlog that made me think, "This one is salvageable!" I like those moments. Travellingcari (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh well I tried, there seems to be an agenda at work, and I'm not familiar enough with the topic to even counter it. I'm going to let this one be. Travellingcari (talk) 22:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Devlinvideo
Damn, I edit conflict trying to add Devlinvideo to the username board, and then you go and remove it! :)  Corvus cornix  talk  03:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ooops, sorry about that! :) I decided it was better to first try a uw-username warning, but if you feel an immediate notice is appropriate, go for it. Jfire (talk) 03:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I did. Pretty obvious advertising.   Corvus cornix  talk  03:51, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Creating page on Ramashreya Jha.
Please do not delete it. He's a winner of one of the highest awards in Vocal Classical Music in India, the Sangeet Natak Academi Award in 2005. I am building this page now and am also citing refernces to articles and sources. Thanks. Anupa4 (talk) 04:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Anupa4. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupa4 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Weasel Dc Comics
Im sorry, What exactly did I Mess Up On? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redraven20 (talk • contribs) 05:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Replied on your talk page. Jfire (talk) 05:54, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Redraven20 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redraven20 (talk • contribs) 05:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Intrigue
Carlo Suarez wrote THE CYPHER OF GENESIS and explained how the Aleph-Tav(in which Torah is embodied) were Hieroglyphs, not mystical writings. He termed the writing system "cabala." Why is it considered "inappropriate" to add a page that says this? I suspect a cabal to hide the Hieroglyphic nature of Torah. The New Testament describes the effort to keep Torah esoteric. "Why are you speaking of these things and you are not yet 50"(Pharisees to Jesus) I don't feel that you are conscious of the cabal and being used. Please consider referring me to one of my sentences found incomprehensible. Please let me know how you came to be credited with the deletion and warning. How can I get a page to word-wrap? I'll add it to "Help" and "Formatting." Intrigued, John ShoemakerJohnshoemaker (talk) 04:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Johnshoemaker (talk) 03:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnshoemaker (talk • contribs) 03:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Dear Jfire, Possibly you have not referred me to an incomprehensible sentence in my article because you don't have it. There certainly wasn't enough time for you to have read any of it before the instant deletion. I'll include it here unless you ask that I not.Johnshoemaker (talk) 05:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Baron von Lemon
Hi there. I saw you prodded Baron von Lemon. Whilst I agree that this is a minor character from long back who probably doesn't meet the notability guidelines, I tend to think that this kind of article - about the obscure stuff - is part of what makes Wikipedia great. It's not promoting anybody, it's not self-aggrandisement, and somebody might just find it useful or interesting. Can I ask you to reconsider? If not, can I get you to take it to AfD? Thanks, Chris (talk) 08:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure, it's a proposed deletion, so anybody can contest it. I went ahead and removed the notice. Note however that many editors, myself included, feel that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an indiscriminate collection of information. We cover what other third parties have found notable and chosen to write about, and just because we don't have an article on something obscure doesn't mean that information is inaccessible or cannot be covered elsewhere. I can see your point, that it's a relatively innocuous article, and I'll let someone else take it to AfD if they desire, but I anticipate that's where it will eventually end up. Yours, Jfire (talk) 16:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks :) Chris (talk) 20:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Notice of temporary injunction
Hi Jfire, I noticed you redirected an article about a television character (and I personally think that article was in very poor shape), but I am letting you know that there is currently a temporary injunction that applies to all editors while this arbitration case is open. The injunction was enacted on February 3, 2008 and it reads:

"For the duration of this case, no editor shall redirect or delete any currently existing article regarding a television series episode or character; nor un-redirect or un-delete any currently redirected or deleted article on such a topic, nor apply or remove a tag related to notability to such an article. Administrators are authorized to revert such changes on sight, and to block any editors that persist in making them after being warned of this injunction."

The arbitration committee would like all editors to hold off on such actions while the case is open. I will also notify you when the injunction ends. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, right, I think I had heard about the injunction, but it slipped my mind at the time. In this case, it seems to be an obviously uncontroversial redirect as the article was a duplicate of Doremi Harukaze, which is already a redirect. But I can see that the injunction makes no allowance for even the most uncontroversial actions, and much as I disagree with it, I'll take care not to redirect further articles. Jfire (talk) 16:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Richard Alan Fox
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Richard Alan Fox, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Richard Alan Fox. Deb (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Claritisim
Hey, the reason why there are no links to other websites about this is because the religion has just started, we are working on making a web page, please do not take down our current information, we are currently trying to get people aware of our religion and spread the word. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brasker (talk • contribs) 06:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Brasker. Thanks for your comment, but Wikipedia is not soapbox or a place for promoting your religion, and therefore Claritism is not an appropriate article here. Jfire (talk) 07:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and whether or not my religion has a web page on the internet or not, does not make it any less of a religion, and the fact that it does exist, I believe warrants it to be on wikipedia. I find the fact that you are trying to remove my religious beliefs from the internet, not only insulting, but also bigoted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brasker (talk • contribs) 08:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Emailed
I emailed you the articles seconds ago. In the past, I've found the Wikipedia email feature a bit slow. I'd be interested in finding out when you received them. Noroton (talk) 03:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll keep adding to the article. Noroton (talk) 03:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Dick Parker speedyability....
I wasn't sure whether that would qualify as speedy since he asserts some notability and some admins are quick on the 'he exists, he's notable' button so I figured AfD might be inevitable. Travellingcari (talk) 04:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

VampKing
FYI, I have indefblocked VampKing as an admitted sockpuppet of blocked user Jonathon The Impaler. -- But | seriously | folks   05:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My Encounter with the Rebbe
Thanks for the redirect/merge. I'd actually anticipated it being controversial so tagged it rather than doing it, and then entirely forgot about it o:) TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 18:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. TO me it seemed pretty clear that it was more appropriate as an external link on the Rabbi's article. Jfire (talk) 18:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * me too, but born and raised in New York I know how passionate the Rebbe's supporters can be and didn't really want to start a holy war like the one ongoing in a couple of AfDs right now. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 18:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Tim Kinsella
Just a friendly note on the prod for Tim Kinsella that you contested with an edit summary of "member of notable bands is notable per WP:MUSIC". What WP:MUSIC actually says is "Members of notable bands are not given individual articles unless they have demonstrated notability for activity independent of the band."--Fabrictramp (talk) 14:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Good point. But since he was a member of at least four notable bands, and released several solo albums on a notable label, I think it's pretty clear that condition applies. Feel free to AfD if you disagree. Jfire (talk) 16:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I actually agree with removing the prod, I just wanted to make sure you didn't think WP:MUSIC said something it doesn't. Cheers! --Fabrictramp (talk) 16:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: Block of BlonddudeGoneDark
Thanks for your message on my talk page. Disruptive edits such as this contributed to my block decision. --Kralizec! (talk) 18:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Web 2.0
If you are familiar with Web 2.0 can you take a look at these articles that I started in my sandboxs User_talk:Igorberger/21-november-2007-01-january-2008. If you have time I would appreciate if you can join me in editing the articles to bring them to main space. You are welcome to just dig in my sandbox and do constructive edits. Some articles are detalied but need to establish notability, while others just have a little content on the subject and need extensive work. Thank you, Igor Berger (talk) 23:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * From a quick look, it seems like those articles have some fairly serious problems in terms of notability and promotional tone. Personally, I find many of the tactics used by SEO consultants distasteful and would prefer to invest my time in other areas. Best of luck to you, Jfire (talk) 02:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * just visiting, but that is one of the reasons we need such articles, done right of course. DGG (talk) 05:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Code momentum
Hi, Jfire, i have a question about Code momentum, (a term i was not aware about until you prodded it), its tagged Neologism, well the article itself is from 2003, hundreds of people must have been reading it and now 5 years later its not notable ? Let me express my opinion that i would like to find articles in this encyclopedia about what is not common used, he ! i learned something today about something not so common, so turning it around to delete articles with the argument, not common used is very strange, and last, the article is referenced, so please remove the prod from the article. Cheers. Mion (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Mion, thanks for your message. On the issue of neologisms, Wikipedia has a guideline specifically about them: WP:Avoid neologisms. Please familarize yourself with that guideline, and if you still feel the article should be kept, feel free to remove the prod. Note however, that the reference in the article is from a wiki site, so it is not a reliable source. Thanks, Jfire (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Jfire, i have been reading the WP:Avoid neologisms, are words and terms that have recently been coined, generally do not appear in any dictionary, but may be used widely or within certain communities. The article is from 2003, not recently coined, do not appear in a common dictionary, but maybe in a good IT dictionary, may be used widely or within certain communities, which would be the PERL programmers community, maybe 2.000.000 people. now for me, i like articles from dictionaries i don't posses, and about terms and issues in communities i didn't join, the last point the wiki external link, that was a good point, the reference is on CPAN, home of Perl, and on savannah, I think the best option is to CAT it into the perl categorie as well,. CheersMion (talk) 20:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Hollyoaks: Charlie Dean
Please do not write Charles as Charlie Dean's full name.

He was Christened "Charlie Adam Dean" not "Charles." —Preceding unsigned comment added by XxZaydenxx (talk • contribs) 20:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

End of the temporary injunction
The arbitration committee have reached a decision in this arbitration case and the temporary injunction related to television episode articles and television character articles has now ended. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 02:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

speedy
It turns out, just from checking google, that Peter Zageris  is in fact a famous artist. DGG (talk) 05:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * URLs? No hits on gnews or books. Some directory listings and commercial sites in the web results, but for a properly famous artist I would expect a lot more. I do look, you know. Jfire (talk) 05:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Declined prods
Hello, ... please consider placing a   on Talk pages when you decline a PROD ... Happy Editing! &mdash;  16:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I have been doing so, for the most part, and updating Category talk:Cuban contemporary artists/Checklist. Sorry if I missed any! Jfire (talk) 16:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * We're cool ... this is just a boilerplate because I found two that you missed. :-) Happy Editing! &mdash;  23:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Marin Creek
An article that you have been involved in editing, Marin Creek, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Marin Creek. Thank you. W-i-k-i-l-o-v-e-r-1-7 (talk) 21:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for those, any help with the mouth and source coordinates in the box?W-i-k-i-l-o-v-e-r-1-7 (talk) 21:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

what exactly is gill tract?W-i-k-i-l-o-v-e-r-1-7 (talk) 10:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD ZHLT
I have addressed your points as best I can in the ZHLT AfD, and would appreciate it if you took another look. Thanks. 98.203.237.75 (talk) 11:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Missouri Senate
Thanks for this. Can't believe I missed the double re-direct. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 04:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No prob. Bot would have fixed it eventually anyway. :) Jfire (talk) 04:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * We wear out the poor bots, I think it was WP:Cleanup but can't remember for sure now but a recent spate of vandalism almost caused bot to quit. I can't help it, I just picture the bots as *batteries not included critters! TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 04:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

coordinates help
at Kilkare Woods, California please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by NewAtThis (talk • contribs) 00:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the catch, that saves me a lot of work. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 01:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Devta
Restored. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 07:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Number One with a Bullet
An article that you have been involved in editing, Number One with a Bullet, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Number One with a Bullet. Thank you. B. Wolterding (talk) 17:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Masada (Honorverse)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Masada (Honorverse), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Masada (Honorverse) (2nd nomination). Thank you. B. Wolterding (talk) 13:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Manufacturing Execution System
Another editor has added the  template to the article Manufacturing Execution System, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Trevor Steedman
An article that you have been involved in editing, Trevor Steedman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Trevor Steedman. Thank you. B. Wolterding (talk) 10:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Withington, Greater Manchester
I see that you removed the prod template from this article. The reason I nominated it for deletion is because the area is already covered in the Withington article, and this one looks like a stub left over from a previous merge.

Will you restore the deletion template, or shall I take this to AfD? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 12:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, they're two different things. One is a suburban area, the other is a political district. According to Withington, the suburban area consists roughly of the wards of Withington and Old Moat. It does not appear to me that either of these latter articles have been merged to Withington. Category:Manchester City Council Wards contains articles about 26 wards. If you feel that these articles cannot stand alone, you should probably discuss it with WikiProject Greater Manchester. A delete is not a likely outcome from an AfD per WP:GEOG. Jfire (talk) 15:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Manufacturing Execution System
An editor has nominated Manufacturing Execution System, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

"Ben Stevens" Page
I am Ben Stevens and it is not appropriate for you t list my children's name or where I reside. the reference to the "Alaska Fishing" rights are heresay and an article in a newspaper should not be valid reference for a living biography page. I am unaware of who orginally listed that garbage on my living biography but suspect it is politically motivated. remove it permanently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bostonb5 (talk • contribs) 22:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This issue is being discussed here. Jfire (talk) 23:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Prodded Earthrise
Just to let you know I've added a host of citations to Earthrise, including press releases and third-party news articles to address your concerns. I've also gone ahead and removed the prod tag. The article is really suffering from bloat and gameguide material and needs to be slimmed down a lot, which I'll try to work on over the next few weeks. Any questions, please let me know. Many thanks! Gazimoff (talk) 20:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Great, go to it! Jfire (talk) 02:46, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletion request of Lairds of Burnbrae
Well I am happy to see that the outcome of the debate was to keep the page. I havn't logged into my Wikipedia account in quite awhile but I see alot has happened in way of discussion. As you stated I have given all the information on this webpage but it is definatly open to other people to add to it. I am still researching for more information and sources and when they are found they will be added. The Earls of Rosebery, also known as Lord Dalmeny bear the surname of Primrose and are well documented while the Lairds of Burnbrae, also from the Primrose family have very little documented about them. Sarajaynej (talk) 06:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Mohsin Razi
Hi, I just added some more links, I'll add more details soon. I had removed articleissues before because it was ok with Toddst. I believe I've satisfied some of the issues - could you confirm - verifiable claim that he is the current Consul General of Pakistan in New York, enough sources of reference now, and a decent amount of articles now link to this as well. Leaving notability and Conflict of Interest. I was wondering if you could suggest ways I could achieve this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Razih (talk • contribs) 21:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, first of all, are you Mohsin, or closely related to him? If so, you would appear to have a conflict of interest, and my advice would be to avoid editing this article altogether. The reasons we discourage editors from editing articles on subjects which they are intimately related to is that it frequently gives rise to other problems such as those this article is tagged for. As for the other specific issues that are tagged, they seem basically accurate at this time. Being the Consul General is a claim of notability, but it should be backed up with references to significant coverage in reliable sources -- it's not clear that any of the external links qualify (admittedly I only looked at them briefly). The orphan tag is definitely appropriate as no other article pages link to Mohsin Razi -- only user pages and spam reports. Jfire (talk) 22:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I am not Mohsin, I'm his Son - Haider. that is why i understand the COI, having said that, for the category Pakistani Diplomats, most have been done by relatives, or people with COI- I am currently trying to populate this Category. Being the Consul General, can be confirmed by going to the US Dept. of State and the Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs site, can be verified. I also understand the Orphan tag now - thanks alot, i'll try and fix that. Would it be then ok for the Original Research, Verifiability and Notability tags to be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Razih (talk • contribs) 22:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I've moved this discussion to the article talk page. Jfire (talk) 23:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Firefly322
I have files a case against this user in Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents. This users edits are becoming very problematic.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 14:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD check
Thanks for looking into that for me! Nick Graves (talk) 21:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks! But my Wikimood is actually ok, I just forgot to update the counter. But thanks for the vote of confidence and reminding me to change it ;) Weather in DC is awful today. I can't wait for May, I intend to go kayaking (and by kayaking I mean sit in a kayak and get drunk while the current floats me) on the Brandywine River: picture here. &rArr;   SWAT Jester    Son of the Defender  22:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Pasta code
But why wouldn't you also prod Lasagna code? -- Robocoder ( t|c ) 07:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It wasn't tagged with notability. It probably should be deleted or merged; I don't think it's in common usage. Jfire (talk) 02:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Lewis Center for Educational Research
I found some references for Lewis Center for Educational Research at http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Lewis+Center+for+Educational+Research%22 and added a few to the article. If you check the article history, you'll see that the text after the first bullet point was deleted by an IP user. --Eastmain (talk) 07:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Good catch, I fixed one of the cites and removed the prod. Jfire (talk) 16:44, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Adolf Frey
Thank you for creating the Adolf Frey article. Could you please add a reference section to the article? --Eastmain (talk) 19:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

speculation
gossip protocol is so full of half-baked speculation "might" that I wonder if the professor wrote any of the code he is selling. routing is so clear and full of links to the way things are actually done, that it's a good starting point for understanding category:network architecture. How is it that you get more out of gossip protocol than routing? BrewJay (talk) 04:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Andrew Slattery
An article that you have been involved in editing, Andrew Slattery, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Andrew Slattery. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Yumegusa (talk) 18:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert
here. I wonder which sock that was. StarM 23:29, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Ben Stevens
sorry, wasn't sure how to do citations —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.3.128.3 (talk) 17:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nike sponsorships
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nike sponsorships, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Nike sponsorships. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 02:05, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi...I just wanted to thank you for adding the photo on the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge page. That's an awesome pic! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grillo7 (talk • contribs) 08:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Prod Removal
Why did you remove the prod template? --Marshall T. Williams (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Restoring
I am going to restore the prod template, because this article contains incorrect information. If you are confused, please ask me on my talk page what you are confused about. --Marshall T. Williams (talk) 20:29, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:PROD. Any editor can contest a proposed deletion for any reason, by removing the prod notice, in which case it should not be restored. In any case, inaccurate information is not usually a reason for deleting an entire article, as it can be fixed by correcting the inaccuracies or removing them. Jfire (talk) 20:32, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Oo
Oo. Thank you. It's just that I became all nervous when I saw that this article was really wrong. I am going to ask you to pitch in and help; Austell is located in Cobb County only - NOT Douglas county and Cobb. --Marshall T. Williams (talk) 20:43, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Great, feel free to correct the article. It would be best if you can provide a reference so that that fact can be verified and other editors don't restore the incorrect information. If you can find one, I can show you how to cite it in the article. Jfire (talk) 20:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Austell
The Austell article is looking a little bare now that I've had to remove a lot of wrong information. --Marshall T. Williams (talk) 20:48, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Let's continue the discussion at Talk:Austell, Georgia. Jfire (talk) 20:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Shawn Stuckey
I noticed that you reverted my proposed deletion of Shawn Stuckey with the reasoning that having been an NFL player was sufficient reason to be notable--I disagree. For the following reasons I still argue and move to delete such entry:

According to notability standards, independent secondary sources provide the most objective evidence of notability. This article, even after multiple suggestions, still does not use a substantial number of entries that are secondary. A majority, more than 80% from the subjects own website. Which delves into "Independent of the subject" criteria excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject including (but not limited to): self-publicity, advertising, self-published material by the subject, autobiographies, press releases.

Having played in the NFL for one (1) year does not in itself qualify for notability. Given that the subject of this entry might have been notable when he broke an NFL record his rookie year, the fact of the matter is that the subject does not meet notability standards. Wikipedians pride ourselves in not becoming a Who's Who encyclopedia.

Notability is not static. I do agree that the subject's story is interesting and maybe in the future an entry should be written once notability standards are met. In the meantime, this entry must be deleted. Thank you. User: Creator1981
 * Hi Creator, thanks for the note. My objection to deletion is based on the guidelines at WP:ATHLETE which state that "people who have competed at the fully professional level of a sport" are generally notable. The same guideline does say that "meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included" but I can tell you from experience here that articles about fully professional athletes are almost invariably kept at WP:AFD, because playing professionally is a highly reliable indicator that significant coverage in secondary sources is available. Nevertheless, you are free to continue to advocate the deletion of the article, though it must now be done through the WP:AFD process; once a proposed deletion has been contested, it should not be restored. I will accordingly remove the prod notice once again. Cheers, Jfire (talk) 00:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

can you tell me how to "take it to afd"
I read the "articles for deletion" page and thought I followed the exact steps required. What did I do wrong? This is regarding the deletion of "porn for the blind." You undid my edits and wrote "take it to afd" which I do not understand. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelatomato (talk • contribs) 17:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * See WP:BEFORE and WP:DEL for the deletion policies and procedures. You did follow the correct steps for a proposed deletion, one of our two main avenues for deletion. Also following those steps, I contested that deletion. (In fact, the article was not actually eligible for a proposed deletion, because it had previously been at WP:AFD.) Now someone has nominated it for articles for deletion. Feel free to add your comments here. Don't forget to add your signature by typing ~ . Jfire (talk) 17:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks Angelatomato (talk) 19:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

On the programming anti-patterns page you've deleted pattern names with red links. Perhaps these should be left unlinked rather than removed? The pattern names and summaries which are still pertinent to the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.102.36 (talk) 18:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Pat Ament
Hello Jfire,

I've establshed communication with Pat Ament and have offered to help improve the article about him. I noticed you did a couple of edits and wanted to give you a "heads up". Clearly, the article needs work - references, and elimination of "cut and paste" material. Your input would be appreciated. Jim Heaphy (talk) 03:44, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Tom Frost photos
Hello, I wanted to let you know that Tom Frost has signed an agreement allowing use of his climbing photos under the terms of the Creative Commons Atribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. I received a signed copy in today's mail, and sent a scan to Maggie Dennis in the permissions department at the Wikimedia Foundation. I am mailing her an original as well. He has authorized me to act as his agent in downloading, scanning and uploading photos, as he isn't a regular computer user. If there are specific Frost photos that you want uploaded, please let me know. I will be quite busy in the next few days, but I will do it as soon as possible. Jim Heaphy (talk) 02:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey Jim, that's great news. Many of Tom's photos are classics, of course, and, if they can be obtained at sufficient quality, potential featured picture candidates. Among the ones I'd like to see (not these copies necessarily):


 * Robbins, El Cap spire
 * John Harlin atop the Aiguille du Fou
 * El Cap Meadow
 * TM Herbert
 * Royal Robbins and Joe Fitschen in Camp 4, p, 276, Jones, Climbing in North America
 * This in higher quality
 * Jeff Lowe, '79 Ama Dablam expedition (needs verification)
 * Choinard
 * His images from Fifty Classics


 * Many of the portraits of Frost himself are likely not his own copyright. The iconic shot of him leading the Salathe Headwall roof is Robbins's -- I wonder if we could get permission for that?


 * Anyway, thanks for your efforts. Jfire (talk) 07:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

99 North
I am currently considering creating an article titled "99 North (record label)" which would then redirect to Higher State and noticed your reference to nominating 99 North for deletion with reference to AnimalSense - just wondering whether you think it would be an idea to create a Disambiguation page for them both, since it has been now been merged with the reference section of Whistler Blackcomb and, if so, what you suggest as a description for the original 99 North to differentiate it from the record label - your thoughts...? (I have posted a message to User talk:Tikiwont asking for his input, as he merged the article, but I now notice he is on an editing break. Hudson702 (talk) 13:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:TV articles of unclear notability
Category:TV articles of unclear notability, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:31, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Paratoari dots.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Paratoari dots.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:21, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:TV articles of unclear notability has been nominated for discussion
Category:TV articles of unclear notability, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Laundry Pizza 03  ( d c&#x0304; ) 17:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Self Portrait with Skeleton Arm.jpg


The file File:Self Portrait with Skeleton Arm.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unusued (aside from its own description), and higher-quality copies now on Commons"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vahurzpu (talk) 03:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Jfire!


Happy New Year! Jfire, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Abishe (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

WP:STALKING?
Hello. Are you stalking my edits? There are several pages which you have edited after me, despite you not having any involvement beforehand. It seems there are quite a number of them to be just a coincidence:.

Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:43, 26 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi MrsSnoozyTurtle. I monitor proposed deletions (via User:DumbBOT/ProdSummary) and AfDs and challenge nominations where I believe the rationale is contrary to consensus interpretations of relevant policies and guidelines such as WP:N and WP:DEL. It is true that I find myself challenging your nominations somewhat regularly, but that's not stalking, it's because (in my opinion) your interpretation of policies often differs from community consensus, as evidenced by the keep outcomes in AfDs such as those you've cited above. That's fine; Wikipedia's processes are designed to encompass differences of opinion, but it does mean that your nominations may receive scrutiny and challenges from other editors. In the end, I'm sure we all are just trying to build the best enyclopedia we can, and if my actions gave any other impression I apologize. Best, Jfire (talk) 02:44, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the explanation and for the good faith- no apology is necessary! That makes sense about the proposed deletions log, and I appreciate your advice. All the best, MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:31, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Crime in Uganda
I do not fault you in removing the prod. That's totally fair. That said... this article is total crap. It doesn't match the other "Crime in X" articles. Terribly written by a user with an axe to grind. It needs a full rewrite, but I'm not the guy to do it. But I can do what I can to help the process along. I highly suspect that if I draftify, the primary author will move it back to main article space. That leaves only one last option... AFD. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes, I see your point about the article's quality. It might help you in future proposed deletions of this sort to cite something like WP:TNT instead of scope and notability. If that had been the rationale, I might not have contested the prod. But the examples for other countries show that Wikipedia could have an article that satisfies WP:N, etc., so "NN topic that is hugely too broad" isn't a very convincing rationale. Best, Jfire (talk) 02:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Thanks! - UtherSRG (talk) 11:37, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your revert of my edit to AfD/La venta inn
I refer to your revert of my edit to the above AfD. You do not appear to give a reason for doing so. Unless you have a good reason to remove my comments - that the article requires improvement, especially in providing the full name of the state and the nation per MoS - I strongly suggest that you reinstate it. I look forward to your response. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * If you want to make that change to the article, please just go ahead and do it. Making a comment about it in a deletion discussion, in a way that disparages a class of editors, is needlessly WP:POINT-ty. Not to mention you stuck it between my own comment and signature, so it was unclear who was saying what. Jfire (talk) 15:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of David Morgan (engineer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Morgan (engineer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Morgan (engineer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

edits to Tania Roxborogh page
Kia ora (hi) from me about the wikipedia page. I was told I needed to include a bit more cultural details (i.e. which iwi - tribe (indigenous) I belong to) as this is important in our country that, if you are Māori, you name your iwi (tribe). I try as much as possible not to 'interfere' with the content but thought I should also update the photo. Sorry if I have broken the rules Roxborogh (talk) 06:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Kia ora! Are you, as your username suggests, the subject of Tania Roxborogh? If so, please note that Wikipedia policy strongly discourages you from directly editing articles about yourself. See WP:AUTO for alternatives to directly editing the page. Thanks! Jfire (talk) 14:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Bhutan Media Foundation
many thanks for your support of this page and excellent contributions, and also for cleaning up my referencing. I have taken note and will be more thorough in future. very much appreciated. Doctor 17 (talk) 01:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Happy to collaborate! I hope the article is kept at AfD. The notability guidelines for organizations sometimes do Wikipedia a disservice by enabling editors to exclude useful encyclopedic content about notable nonprofits and CSOs under rules that are intended to keep out commercial spam. Jfire (talk) 01:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

AfD Adidas sponsorships
Hello, given your involvement in the previous AfD on the same article; could you please have a look at Articles for deletion/List of Adidas sponsorships? Kind regards, Jeff5102 (talk) 13:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Peter Pilotto and Christopher De Vos
Hi Jfire, why are the designers of the wedding dress of princess Eugenie not clickable on the article? Would you be able to help to change this please? 2077PP (talk) 21:48, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

 * Thank you! Jfire (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Let Go (KMFDM album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Let Go (KMFDM album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Let Go (KMFDM album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Jax 0677 (talk) 11:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Miss Polly Had a Dolly
Hello, Jfire,

Thanks for bringing my declined PROD to AFD. I'd say that about half of the articles I've PROD'd are either declined or I've failed to see that they have already been PROD'd before. I don't seem to get them to a deletion discussion but it's on my "to-do" list for several of these articles. I don't see many editor picking up on articles that were de-PROD'd to take them to the next step so I just wanted to say thank you even if it turns out that this article becomes better sourced and is Kept. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


 * You're quite welcome. I see that the user continues to move the article back and forth from draft and remove AFD tags even after we've both asked them to stop. May be time for a stronger response. Jfire (talk) 23:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

My over-generalization
Okay, granted, I didn't mean ALL the keep votes, and to be honest, I stopped reading the keep votes after I looked at the votes from accounts that had less than 50 edits, which are the majority of the keep votes. I apologize for not scrutinizing each and every one of them. There are only so many hours in a day. I'm sorry that I overlooked yours and certainly meant no offense to you. Fred Zepelin (talk) 03:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Sorry about Violating WP:PROD
@Jfire Hello, apologies for reinstating the proposed deletion on 1617 in Sweden. I did not know that proposals for deletion cannot be put back after being deleted, however I know that ignorance is not an excuse; I will be more cautious regarding Wikipedia policy in the future. Thank you for your patience, have a nice rest of your day. Royz-vi Tsibele (talk) 12:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)


 * No problem! There are a lot of policies and I realize not everyone knows all of them. You have a nice day too! Best, Jfire (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Reddi AfD
Hello, I have never commented on an AfD so I have a question. The conclusion from the first time the article was nominated was that it doesn't meet WP:GNG, and I find no significant changes since 2012, so presumably WP:GNG is a good reason this time as well. Does that constitute a reasonable argument on its own? Kimen8 (talk) 11:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Yes, I think there's an argument to be made that the situation hasn't changed much since the first AfD. In that AfD, made the best argument, and I think it holds up well (although Reddi is no longer a student). Thanks for participating if you decide to do so. Jfire (talk) 14:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)