User talk:Jgera5/2013 Archive


 * This archive includes edits to User talk:Jgera5 from 2013. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the user's regular talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pittsburgh Steelers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Linking
Hi, thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Please note that years, dates, particularly months and days (unless in a specifically chronological article), and common terms (including commonly recognised countries and geographical names) are not normally linked. Please ask me if you have any questions. Tony  (talk)  14:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Please note again that linking common chronological items is not done unless there's a good reason for it. If you want me to point to the overwhelming community decision on this, in 2009, please let me know. In the meantime, do remember that other people have to clean up after you, which is an unnecessary impost. Tony   (talk)  06:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Blanking / Redirecting
Please don't just blank articles about companies that you feel fail WP:CORP and replace them with redirects as you did at Belair National Bank‎. Articles that have not been newly created that have notability issues should go to WP:AFD. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 14:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Hell in a Cell
Hi there, there's a discussion regarding merging your Hell in a Cell article with the King of the Ring article taking place here. Thanks! —  Richard  BB  20:21, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello,

A week has passed and you've yet to respond to any comments in the merge discussion. The consensus is currently in favour of merging the pages. I was going to do that today but, since you haven't yet had the chance to respond, I'll give you a few more days. -- Scorpion 0422  21:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Belair National Bank et al
I've completed your nomination of this article and listed it in today's AFD log. I also saw the same nomination for Citizens National Bank (Laurel, Maryland), so I combined that debate with the one for Belair - both may now be found at Articles for deletion/Belair National Bank. Since they were listed today, the debate will likely close in 7 days. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 19:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it is an odd case. But I didn't want one article to get kept and another to be deleted, all because people saw one and not the other. Best to do it all at once. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 16:17, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Source for Pete Rose HOF comment
While I completely agree that Rose would have easily walked into the HOF if there were no betting controversy, I'm wondering if the statement that you added to the Big Red Machine article should have a source. I'm not reverting, and I'm not going to flag it for a source, but just to give you a heads up that if that statement is challenged, you might want to add a reliable source. HokieRNB 19:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Yahoo Logo
I saw that you edited the Yahoo! page with the logo that is present on their site on August 7, 2013. This is not their "new" logo. They will be having a different logo every day until they announce their new logo on September 4, 2013. See this article for more information. I did not want to revert your change as an inexperienced user so I will leave that to you. Cheers!

--Sjrr124 (talk) 05:31, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charlie the Tuna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zoltan (hand gesture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neil Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

sorry
I beg to disagree - you have been on wikipedia long enough to realise that some parts of the overall place go very slow - and you would have seen a few of the messages in your time - there is no deadline - and please your everyone calls is totally misfired as far the potential diversity of cultures that are on wikipedia - one view from one part of the states is not how wikipedia works. I will wait to see what happens at death project or a potential Review of the move. Sorry about that but if you had read the talk page carefully enough you would have seen it has all been through before. To resurrect something like this again with everybody knows something as something is insufficient to prevent a review of the move. satusuro 07:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

The Nexus (professional wrestling)
Although well-written, I have to disagree with the idea of posting the 'Legacy' section of the article. For one thing, the article is meant to talk about the Nexus as a group and what they did during their time together. Adding in what happened to them after that time opens the door to more and more and more additions as each member either wins titles, gets released, gets a new gimmick, etc., and that only muddies up the article and bogs it down with unnecessary information. If the reader really wants to know what each member ended up doing after Nexus, they can easily navigate to their respective articles. The various trivia facts are unnecessary, such as mentioning how Daniel Bryan is almost a Grand Slam Champion and that Curtis Axel and Curt Hennig are the first father-son duo IC champions.

There also seems to be some slight NPOV issues in the form of (unintentional or not) weasel wording. There's no way to gauge any of their successes based off of them being in Nexus at all. Just because they were in the Nexus doesn't mean it made them popular or served as 'launching pads' for their careers. Saying that Ryback's character is a 'similar style' to Goldberg is opinion only. Bill Goldberg himself weighed in on the matter some time ago and denied his character is similar to Ryback. Your citation comes from an opinion piece as well. I completely dislike the last paragraph due to the fact that it states Otunga and Mason Ryan haven't been seen in some time, which is very unnecessary and to avoid excessive jargon such as 'face' and 'jobbers.'

All in all, there's no reason for a section to 'keep tabs' on future events each wrestler is a part of. Other, more notable stables and tag teams do not have this kind of section in their article either. In my opinion, I would rather just delete the entire section but for now I've removed the trivia bits, particularly what was put in parenthesis. Antoshi ☏ ★  18:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! v/r - TP 23:46, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.