User talk:Jgera5/2018 Archive


 * This archive includes edits to User talk:Jgera5 from 2018. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the user's regular talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

January 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WWE, you may be blocked from editing. Seriously, what the hell? Did you get hacked or something? If not, don't EVER pull a stunt like that again. You know better than company-parroting nonsense. oknazevad (talk) 02:07, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * oknazevad, I didn't get hacked. I did it as a joke because I was bored, and yes I do know better and I do apologize. (Trust me, as a wrestling fan I get annoyed when WWE refers to wrestling in general as sports entertainment and not just their own product.) That being said, your use of profanity when reverting edits wasn't necessary and shows unprofessionalism when doing the right thing. Even when it's someone who is doing blatant vandalism for no reason, there's no reason to be making yourself look like an idiot in the process. Just a future FYI. Jgera5 (talk) 12:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to WRLH-TV. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Mvcg66b3r, I did notice that you reverted that edit and some edits related to stations or articles related to Sinclair Broadcast Group. I didn't add it without a source, though it may have been unreliable. It came straight from Armstrong William's site that he was looking to acquire those stations--all in markets that are conflict markets for Sinclair--even though it contradicts what other reports are saying. So I do apologize. Wasn't trying to cause issues or anything. Jgera5 (talk) 12:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Now it's Bbabybear02 saying those stations are going to Armstrong Williams. I went to that website and it had a thing about it. Is it a reliable source? Should I revert Bbabybear02's edits? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Admin note: Better start explaining and stop editing. You're adding a lot of unsourced information. Without edit summaries. Stop now. Consider this a final warning. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:10, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Anachronist, can you please list examples besides the last two? Just wondering to help me in the future. Thanks! Jgera5 (talk) 12:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * You answered your own question above. Don't make joke edits. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Honor Club for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Honor Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Honor Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 00:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Proposed acquisition of Tribune Media by Sinclair Broadcast Group ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Proposed_acquisition_of_Tribune_Media_by_Sinclair_Broadcast_Group check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Proposed_acquisition_of_Tribune_Media_by_Sinclair_Broadcast_Group?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to WSFL
 * Sinclair Broadcast Group ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Sinclair_Broadcast_Group check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Sinclair_Broadcast_Group?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to WSFL

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Getgologonew.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Getgologonew.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:14, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Little Caesars logo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Little Caesars logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

PA 876
I notice that several years ago, you to the Mon-Fayette Expressway article that the two northern legs of the road, forming a bypass of the Squirrel Hill Tunnel, would've been numbered PA 876. I don't know where you got this information from, but it's been marked "citation needed" ever since, and I can't find any mention of this plan anywhere else on the internet, including the PTC's website and Jeff Kitsko's PA Highways site. Without a source for this odd claim, it will likely be removed. Roadsguy (talk) 01:20, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Cox
All of these edits have been reverted; the source took back the story days ago. We don't work on rumors around here, it must be 100% confirmed.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:08, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to WPXI has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:23, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

File:AFCNorth.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AFCNorth.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Willy1018 (talk) 14:04, 13 December 2018 (UTC)