User talk:Jgleissn

Alcoholism and slavery
The content you added is probably best at slavery but is a little too detailed for alcoholism. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I strongly disagree:

Slaves were the great victims of alcoholism. Those subjected to abuse by alcoholics need a voice. In terms of reliability, comments made by multiple former slaves, including the most famous former slave, abolitionist Frederick Douglass, rank very high, especially when their views are highly consistent with each other and modern research. The power disparities of slavery created what might be considered laboratory conditions to study alcoholism in the historical and scientific contexts. That power disparity was highlighted again by Joseph Stalin, probably the most abusive alcoholic of all time, although those unversed in the disease of alcoholism fail to grasp the unmistakable characteristics of this infamous abusive alcoholic.

The edited comments were properly placed in the "History" sub-section and added American and world historical perspective to go with the German, Swedish, Greek and ancient examples. All the citations can be verified through a Library of Congress website containing the Federal Writers' Project Slave Narratives; docsouth at the University of North Carolina; or other cited publications.

Editing to the article "Alcoholism" ought to first eliminate junk science, things such as (1) the reference to "peyote" (!!) as a cure for alcoholism, (2) repeated pharmacological references that pale in significance compared to the proven yet article-neglected role of A.A. in "managing" alcoholism, (3) failure to differentiate alcohol use between southern and northern European cultures ("Alcohol consumption is relatively similar between many European cultures," (4) the restriction under "Research" to only the failed pharmacological approach as opposed to more important social psychological, legal and cultural forces and research; and I could go on and on.....

John Dewar Gleissner, Esquire        — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.168.249.240 (talk) 02:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Jgleissn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Coffeepusher (talk) 00:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Jgleissn, I noticed that a majority of your edits involve highlighting the same authors work and it appears that you may have a conflict of interest. Please review wikipedia's conflict of interest policy.  You also inserted links to a blog run by that author, blogs are not allowed to be used and fall under wikipedia's list of links to be avoided.  Your edits are good, but you haven't yet grasped onto wikipedia's style.  Please read wikipedia's guidelines on what kind and how much information should be used, our manual of style, and our policy on how to avoid doing original research.  Also a few of your edits violated copyright laws, as the ideas can be cited but the form in which those ideas were created belong to the author and publishing house.  please read WP:COPYVIO to better understand our policies.  Thank you and good luck editing.Coffeepusher (talk) 01:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Jgleissn, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Treatment of slaves in the United States have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MER-C 18:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)