User talk:Jglogau

US SEC Boiler Room Prosecutions
In challenging the 'neutrality' and 'factual' nature of the article entitled: US SEC Boiler Room Prosecutions the Wikipedia rules clearly state: ''If you add the above code to an article which seems to be biased to you, but there is no prior discussion of the bias, you need to at least leave a note on the article's talk page describing what you consider unacceptable about the article. The note should address the problem with enough specificity to allow constructive discussion towards a resolution, such as identifying specific passages, elements, or phrasings that are problematic''. Therefore, kindly abide by the rules by clearly identifying specific passages, elements, or phrasings that are problematic on the Talk page or remove both 'neutral' and 'factual' POV tags. Your failure to do so will attract sanctions which may include being blocked.

Chopped Lamb (talk) 00:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC) This is your last and final warning. You may attract sanctions which may include being blocked from editing the next time you NPOV-push a page, as you did with this edit to US SEC Boiler Room Prosecutions. &mdash; Chopped Lamb (talk) 23:16, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Ron Bongo
The article Ron Bongo has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ron Bongo
A tag has been placed on Ron Bongo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Caesura(t) 21:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

CorraTech
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article CorraTech, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of CorraTech. - Jameson L. Tai  talk ♦ contribs 04:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

OPENSUITE
A tag has been placed on OPENSUITE, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 05:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Spam in ServerPronto
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on ServerPronto, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ServerPronto is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ServerPronto, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Ed-Magedson.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ed-Magedson.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Ron Bongo
Another editor has added the  template to the article Ron Bongo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

David's Cookies
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David's Cookies, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 23:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Abernathy Group
A tag has been placed on Abernathy Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Abernathy Group and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --23:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Beefyt (talk)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Jerry Murdock. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs) 10:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jerry Murdock


The article Jerry Murdock has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article notability is below individual notability standard. Maintenance templates have gone unanswered for multiple months and article's author has ceased interest in article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop edit-warring on Insight Venture Partners. See also this. 67.164.156.42 (talk) 21:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Articles for creation/Logicworks.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Wywin (talk) 12:59, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Logicworks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 22:46, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Danger High voltage! 00:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of My sandbox 2
Hello Jglogau,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged My sandbox 2 for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits? Also you have your own personal sandbox.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. Let me know if your content gets deleted before you have a chance to move or save it. I can recover it for you.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. &mdash; Σosthenes 12   Talk  16:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

My Sandbox, need a test page
My personal sandbox has a article in it that was moved and published. I want to work on a new test page, if I delete the existing old article text will it mess up the actual published article? That's why I created a "new" personal sandbox page, I am afraid of deleting the published article.

Hi Jglogau,

Once the content is its own article, your sandbox should have no effect on it whatsoever. If you delete the text in your sandbox nothing should happen on the actual article. If it does let me know. That would be kind of strange. Or you can put both articles in your sandbox if you wanted to. It won't effect the real articles. And I noticed that the article in question was deleted. In case you did not have a chance to recovery your content, I have it below for you. Just copy and paste the code without the nowiki tags at the beginning and ends (I would go to the edit mode to copy and paste):

Silverleaf Resorts is a privately owned, award-winning company that operates 13 vacation resorts in seven U.S. states. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, the company is operated by Cerberus Capital Management and employs over 3,000 people.

History
Silverleaf Vacation Club, Inc. was founded in 1977 by real estate developer Robert E. Mead in Tyler, Texas.

In 1989, the company changed its name to Slverleaf Resorts Incorporated and introduced seven resort properties; by 1998, the company was operating 13 Properties in Texas, Missouri, Massachusetts, Illinois, Georgia, Florida and Colorado. In 1998, Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. moved from a privately held company to a publicly traded company on the New York Stock Exchange using the trading symbol SVR; in 2001, the company traded on the American Stock Exchange; later, until 2011, it traded on the NASDAQ under the trading symbol SVLF.

In May 2011, Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. was acquired by Hedge Fund and Private Equity firm Cerberus Capital Management, LP for $94.4 million and taken private. In subsequent months, Thomas J. Morris has assumed the role of the company's Chief Executive Officer.

Recent Awards
Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. has been ranked 100 in Forbes Magazine's list of the Top 200 Best Small Companies in the USA (sales under $350 mm). In 2012, Silverleaf earned the Crowning Achievement Award from Resort Condominiums International (RCI); all 13 resorts earned RCI designation, with six resorts earning Gold Crown Recognition, four earning Silver Crown honors, and three earning RCI Hospitality Awards.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AWS Partner Network (APN) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AWS Partner Network (APN), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AWS Partner Network (APN)


Hello Jglogau. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "AWS Partner Network (APN)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:49, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

File permission problem with File:The Lexington Hotel via 1930.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Lexington Hotel via 1930.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ghostery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proprietary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

712 Fifth Avenue
Do not add "AllTheRooms" to the list of this building's tenants again. Large NYC buildings have many tenants, but the only ones we allow to be listed are companies which have articles in the encyclopedia, ,which makes them "notable" by Wikipedia standards. AllTheRooms does not have an article, therefore it is not notable, therefore it cannot be listed. You've already reverted the removal twice, which means you've taken the first steps into edit warring, please don;t take the next one. BMK (talk) 22:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If you don;t believe me, go to the article talk page. BMK (talk) 00:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of ConveyIQ for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ConveyIQ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ConveyIQ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 06:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)