User talk:Jglucks

Welcome
 Hello, Jglucks, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Jglucks, good luck, and have fun. – Aboutmovies (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. ''Diffs: The entirety of your recent contributions from September 3 2015 to present seems to be to promote one website, a blog, as a reliable source. You need to quickly familiarize yourself with our guidelines on reliable sources and user-generated content. We're not interested in what faceless blogs and other vanity sites have to say. I further advise you to open a discussion at the reliable sources noticeboard to get some community input on your addition of boxofficeflops.com as a reference.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:55, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Reliable source
Any website which has an Wikipedia article is reliable as Rotten Tomatoes, Box Office Mojo, The Numbers (website). --Galaxy Kid (talk) 08:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia only for the purpose of attracting traffic to a web site. It also seems likely that you have been editing in violation of Wikipedia's terms of use, as you may have an undisclosed financial connection to the site you have been linking to. There are also other problems with your editing, such as the fact that at times you have used edit summaries which do not accurately reflect what your edits have been doing. If you are interested in starting to contribute to the encyclopaedia in ways other than linking to your web site, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)