User talk:Jgoodell2

April 2022
Hello Jgoodell2. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Bror Saxberg, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jgoodell2. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 21:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Giraffer, Thank you for the feedback. I'm not being paid to post the article about Bror Saxberg. I co-authored a book that includes a biographical section on Dr. Saxberg and noticed that there wasn't a Wikipedia page for him. If citing my own work is considered conflict of interest I could remove all references to my work. Will that resolve the issue? Would it help to have other editors who know about the field of learning engineering and Dr. Saxberg's role in establishing it contribute to the page? Best regards, Jim Jgoodell2 (talk) 12:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Bror Saxberg moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bror Saxberg, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 02:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi GPL93, Thank you for the feedback. Would documentation of conference presentations such as videos of keynotes, panels, and TED talks on learning sciences and learning engineering be the kind of reliable independent sources needed to legitimize the article? (It seems like You Tube is blocked but perhaps videos of him on another site?) ...or should the additional citations be print works by others? Sincerely, Jim G Jgoodell2 (talk) 13:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bror Saxberg
Hello, Jgoodell2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bror Saxberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee
Hello, Jgoodell2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee


Hello, Jgoodell2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2024 (UTC)